Page 1 of 13 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 129

Thread: Should we feel guilty for the pollution?

  1. #1
    Darn..we put the engine in the wrong place!
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    710

    Should we feel guilty for the pollution?

    I sometimes feel a little guilty for the fact that I legally drive a car that has no emission controls. Do you?

  2. #2
    no never uh uh

    How many miles a year do you drive your car versus how many times you use a gas powered lawn mower? 'Nuff said.
    Kenik
    - 1969 911S
    - 1965/66 911
    - S Reg #760
    - RGruppe #389

  3. #3
    Sometimes I feel guilty eating cows but not chickens
    Mike
    S Registry #825
    73.5 Dalmatian Blue

  4. #4
    Eat a beaver...save a tree.
    Paul Schooley
    71 911T (RS wanabe w/2.7L juice)
    S Reg #863
    R Gruppe #330

  5. #5
    Does anyone else here know that Seagulls, Spotted Owls, and Bald Eagles all taste about the same? Venison tastes better than any of 'em...
    Paul D. Early S Registry #8 - Cyclops Minister of West Coast Affairs
    "Now, to put a water-cooled engine in the rear and to have the radiator in the front, that's not very intelligent." -Ferry Porsche (PANO, Oct. 1973)

  6. #6
    I always like the letter I get every year from the State of California imploring me to consider helping reduce smog by selling my old car to them for $750...
    Peter Kane

    '72 911S Targa
    Message Board Co-Moderator - Early 911S Registry #100

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by pwd72s
    Does anyone else here know that Seagulls, Spotted Owls, and Bald Eagles all taste about the same? Venison tastes better than any of 'em...
    Elk and fallow deer taste better than beef; I'd eat a seagull, too. When's the BBQ? Maybe I can cook the meat on the exhaust of my car.

    Quote Originally Posted by 72targa
    I always like the letter I get every year from the State of California imploring me to consider helping reduce smog by selling my old car to them for $750...
    They actually do that? I wonder what Ken Behring thinks when he gets hundreds of the same letter sent to his museum. What a waste of taxpayer money printing that crap.
    Kenik
    - 1969 911S
    - 1965/66 911
    - S Reg #760
    - RGruppe #389

  8. #8
    Defender of the Normal John Fusco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    1,925
    Just had venison last night - delish.

    My feeling now is the only way to get the system changed from fossil fuel is to use it all up !

    John

    Du must schwein haben

    901/05 #305701

    Bultaco Metralla 62 M8
    1968 BMW R69S

    Early911SReg #606

  9. #9
    LMAO...long live the gas powered, smog schmackin, scare yo momma 911 engined monsters.
    Paul Schooley
    71 911T (RS wanabe w/2.7L juice)
    S Reg #863
    R Gruppe #330

  10. #10
    Senior Member WHCJr72S's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Bay Area
    Posts
    209
    Peter:
    The state of California offered you $750 for your old car, you should take it. They only offered me $500 . Isn't nice to drive a car that does not need to be smogged every two years.
    Bill Cilker, Jr.
    Gold 72 911S
    31 Ford Model A
    PCA, Early S Registry (#98) & RGruppe (#272)
    Rotarian

Similar Threads

  1. Should we feel guilty for the pollution?
    By dhopkins in forum General Info
    Replies: 65
    Last Post: 10-14-2013, 09:37 AM
  2. Feel the Thunder - AGAIN @ NJMP
    By nickd in forum Drives, Tours, Gatherings, Racing and Adventures
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-27-2009, 10:54 AM
  3. I feel a bit like Columbus...
    By John Fusco in forum Drives, Tours, Gatherings, Racing and Adventures
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-13-2005, 03:29 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.