Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: '70 T with Alloy Trailing arms--best shod/T Bar set-up

  1. #1

    '70 T with Alloy Trailing arms--best shod/T Bar set-up

    I've recently bought '70 T, RS Tribute with a '83 ROW 3.2 SS, and a 915.

    We recently put on alloy trailing arms with 964 brakes all around and while the ride height looks great, there is little suspension travel F&R.

    Wondering what the best shock, T-Bar set up might be. The car doesn't have rear adj spring plates, should I start there? Its got bilsteins in back and Koni's up front, from what year/model, I have no idea.

  2. #2
    21mm front and 26mm rear bars for street driving
    Bilstein HD all the way around
    Some sort of aftermarket suspension bushing setup would be recommended, too.
    Adjustable spring plates are a help, but not necessary.

    Sounds like a cool car ... enjoy!
    -Marco
    SReg. #778 OGrp: #8 RGrp: #---
    TLG Auto: Website
    Searching for engine #907495 and gearbox 902/1 #229687

  3. #3
    Or use 21mm front and 27mm rear bars for street driving
    Bilsteins with digressive valving

    Most like rubber front bushings, some like the polybronze from Elephant

  4. #4
    Which bilsteins, from a later model year to account for the allow arms?

  5. #5
    I'll call +1 on the 21/26 combination (in hollow and plugged equivalence) but I'm also a fan of beefier sway bars. The choice will also depend on what profile tyres you're running and the sidewall compliance. As for travel, I assume your fronts have had the 19mm spindle drop?

    Cheers,
    Mark
    Early S #2826

    Garage:
    '73 E (2.7RS replica) - sold
    '94 968 Clubsport M030 - sold
    '67 250SE Cabriolet - sold
    '71 Skyline GT - sold
    '69 911S - sold
    '73 911T/RS

  6. #6
    21/26 sounds too front stiff to me. I use 22/29 in my lightweight. I would say 21/27 would give a better ride than 21/26.
    1971 911S, 2.7RS spec MFI engine, suspension mods, lightened
    Early 911S Registry Member #425

  7. #7
    member #1515
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    San Antonio, Texas
    Posts
    4,261
    How did you put alloy trailing arms on a 1970? Don't your rear shocks rub? Or did you modify the arms?
    I agree with Max. Use 19 front and stick with your 26 rear.
    Are all your bushings in good shape?
    David

    '73 S Targa #0830 2.7 MFI rebuilt to RS specs

  8. #8
    No rubbing, maybe because it's a later trans?

  9. #9
    Senior Member H-viken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    456
    Quote Originally Posted by Ridgebk995 View Post
    No rubbing, maybe because it's a later trans?
    It shouldn't have anything to do with the gearbox (if that's what you mean by "trans").

    Would you mind taking a few pictures of where your shocks go through the rear crossmember? The reason I'm curious is that I'm about to do the same installation myself on my 911T from -70 and was under the clear impression that the trailing arms need machining.

    /Johan

  10. #10
    Differential stiffness of F/R torsion bars will affect oversteer/understeer. That is the main thing to think about.

Similar Threads

  1. Swap steel trailing arms with alu trailing arms?
    By Zithlord in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 89
    Last Post: 10-16-2018, 02:37 AM
  2. WTB: 69 Trailing Arms
    By Shaun 69 E in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 02-26-2014, 07:33 AM
  3. 72 911 Trailing Arms
    By mrg3.6 in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 09-10-2012, 09:05 AM
  4. 67/68S Trailing Arms
    By Mr9146 in forum General Info
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 10-20-2010, 07:08 PM
  5. FS: 73 RS trailing arms
    By parced@telia.co in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-22-2009, 05:08 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.