Page 33 of 86 FirstFirst ... 2331323334354383 ... LastLast
Results 321 to 330 of 857

Thread: '77 & '75 Turbo Look 3.0

  1. #321
    Quote Originally Posted by Ernie W View Post
    Keith:
    The 1974 RS, 3.0 l. M491 "for street use" has the 85 ltr. tank

    The 1974 RSR, 3.0 l. M491 "competition type" has the 110 ltr. tank
    Ernie, you never cease to impress, sir! - now if I can find some photos....

    EDIT: Wait; why is the document giving the part number for RSR injectors under the 85L tank heading?



    The more I think about it, short of any photo evidence to the contrary I'm leaning toward the opinion that the claim that the plastic 85L "RS" tank was actually installed in '74 3.0RS is an error in the Snodgrass book.. Every photograph I can find shows the standard 74-on steel tank, is it possible it is also being referred to by Porsche as "85-liter" (albeit actually 80) at the time?
    Last edited by keith; 02-19-2017 at 11:58 AM.
    keith
    '75 RS/RSR-look | '73 CB750 | '70 TD250B

    r gruppe # 436

  2. #322

    73/74 tanks

    Ok, Thanks... This is out of the FIA Homologation 3053, Carrera 2.7 for 1973. And the injectors with the fuel tank, it's the only page in the book that pertains to engine/fuel...
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Ernie W
    member of Early 911S Registry

  3. #323
    Quote Originally Posted by keith View Post
    Ernie, you never cease to impress, sir! - now if I can find some photos....

    EDIT: Wait; why is the document giving the part number for RSR injectors under the 85L tank heading?



    The more I think about it, short of any photo evidence to the contrary I'm leaning toward the opinion that the claim that the plastic 85L "RS" tank was installed in '74 3.0RS is an error in the Snodgrass book.. Every photograph I can find shows the standard 74-on steel tank, which I suspect is also being referred to by Porsche as "85-liter" (albeit actually 80) at the time?

    Kieth,

    I believe the tank in the 3.0 RS was the standard production tank based on photos from various 3.0 RS cars.
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Gib Bosworth
    EarlySReg 434
    R Gruppe 17

  4. #324
    Quote Originally Posted by letsrollbabe View Post
    Kieth,

    I believe the tank in the 3.0 RS was the standard production tank based on photos from various 3.0 RS cars.
    Gib, that's what I was thinking also, based on everything I've seen; however Ernie offers some compelling documentation to back up Snodgrass' assertion!

    Curiouser and curiouser..



    Ernie, that last document is from '72, yes? so it comments about the '73 RS/RSR most likely?
    keith
    '75 RS/RSR-look | '73 CB750 | '70 TD250B

    r gruppe # 436

  5. #325
    This would not be the first time that the factory docs don't represent how cars were built. I would be surprised if all the pics of the 3.0 RSs show a replacement standard steel tank if the originals came with an 85L plastic tank. My guess is that the plastic 85L tank was originally listed to achieve the 900 kg (1989 lb) weight of the 73 RS for homologation, but in practice the standard steel tanks were supplied.
    Last edited by letsrollbabe; 02-19-2017 at 02:08 PM.
    Gib Bosworth
    EarlySReg 434
    R Gruppe 17

  6. #326
    Quote Originally Posted by letsrollbabe View Post
    I would be surprised if all the pics of the 3.0 RSs show a replacement standard steel tank if the originals came with an 85L plastic tank.
    I agree. I doubt any of them did; although I like that one could get away with installing one in a project if one wanted, per the documents that we're discussing.
    keith
    '75 RS/RSR-look | '73 CB750 | '70 TD250B

    r gruppe # 436

  7. #327
    According to Paul Frere, the racing RSR versions never got down to the 900 kg...most were 925 to 950 kg he says. The 3.0 RS was designed to be an 'evolution' of the Carrera 2.7 RS, which allowed the 3.0 RSs to remain in Group 3 where it 'proved virtually unbeatable' according to Frere. The plastic tank listing most likely would have been necessary on the homologation papers for the 'evolution' designation.
    Gib Bosworth
    EarlySReg 434
    R Gruppe 17

  8. #328
    some of my thoughts...

    Since the 1974 RS and RSR were a homologation variant of the 1973 RS and RSR, factory just added on to the original 73 modifications, to meet the 1974 car updates, then the tanks in post #322 (all 6 tanks) would be legal ?

    The steel vs. plastic fuel tank in not legal is all markets, some countries require a different type of tank material, so they can pass import/safety laws... Gib, is the yellow car RHD ?

    The 1974 Carrera RS 3,0 Ltr. "Street Version" used a "BFG Space Saver Spare" which would determine the type of tank ?

    A street car, would have fuel vapor system, and a fuel recirculation system for the MFI ?

    And I guess, the 1974 Carrera RSR, 3.0 Ltr. "Competition type" could use any size/type tank depending on the type of racing it's used for...

    Last, the below page of the 1973 Homologation Nr. 3053 listing the "Variante" for the Carrera RS, model year 1973/1974, Note: Pos. 7, 80 Ltr. , is that the space saver tank ?

    I think the biggest factor would be the cost and being able to find a special tank...
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Ernie W
    member of Early 911S Registry

  9. #329
    Ernie,

    The yellow car is the James Hunt car which was a RHD. The 80 L 'space saver spare' tank is the standard steel tank. There probably were a few 3.0 RSs built with the plastic tank, and the country it was going to was the key factor, plus the customer preference I suppose. On the pbase site where there are pics showing the tanks, all have the standard 80 L tanks except for 9033 which has a 100L steel ST tank, and 9046 which has a 110L plastic tank.
    Gib Bosworth
    EarlySReg 434
    R Gruppe 17

  10. #330
    great thread you guys; keenly interested in getting to the bottom of this!
    keith
    '75 RS/RSR-look | '73 CB750 | '70 TD250B

    r gruppe # 436

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.