Results 1 to 10 of 64

Thread: Is Metallic Gold the "worst" color?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Camas, WA
    Posts
    105

    Is Metallic Gold the "worst" color?

    Metallic Gold was an extra cost option in 71-73 911's (not sure how much).
    Aubergine was not that popular back then - but sure seems desirable today.

    How do you think the market views Gold cars these days?

    Thanks all.

  2. #2
    Some colors add value to longhoods like Viper green/signal yellow. Metallic gold is a cool period color but just not everyone's cup of tea. I would say that for the right buyer it actually can command a premium price. It's just that not everyone would want to drive around in a gold car. I've seen some pics of this car in the registry and when done right it's uber cool.

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Scottsdale, AZ
    Posts
    9,752
    There is no way that Metallic Gold could dethrone Sepia Brown as the worst color.

    Not even a debate here.


    Like most metallics gold can look magnificent when presented in bristol condition.

    But when it's aged, faded, and clear coat is showing its age it doesn't fair so well.

  4. #4
    Midnight Runner popowitz's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    West LA
    Posts
    1,004
    I love metallic gold. And I think the rarity of the color certainly helped that '74 coupe sell for north of 130K on Ebay a few weeks back.
    Registry Member #1583
    '73 911 S Aubergine (VIN#9113301295)

  5. #5
    member #1515
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    San Antonio, Texas
    Posts
    4,263
    Quote Originally Posted by popowitz View Post
    I love metallic gold. And I think the rarity of the color certainly helped that '74 coupe sell for north of 130K on Ebay a few weeks back.
    That car was Olive not Gold
    David

    '73 S Targa #0830 2.7 MFI rebuilt to RS specs

  6. #6
    Midnight Runner popowitz's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    West LA
    Posts
    1,004
    Quote Originally Posted by RSTarga View Post
    That car was Olive not Gold
    Really? I need to have my eyes checked or get a new monitor.
    Registry Member #1583
    '73 911 S Aubergine (VIN#9113301295)

  7. #7
    Senior Member Bill Simmeth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Virginia's Blue Ridge
    Posts
    1,679
    Quote Originally Posted by Frank Beck View Post
    There is no way that Metallic Gold could dethrone Sepia Brown as the worst color.
    Not even a debate here.
    +1 to that.

    And in my opinion, aubergine is almost an equally polarizing color.

  8. #8
    metallic gold AND sepia are value-plus colors in my book. would be happy with either over really stale colors, like red.
    keith
    '75 RS/RSR-look | '73 CB750 | '70 TD250B

    r gruppe # 436

  9. #9
    Senior Member vipergruen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Milan, Italy
    Posts
    801
    Metallic gold is a big plus for me. Sepia is not.
    Andrea
    Early S registry #1082

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Vancouver, WA
    Posts
    830
    Quote Originally Posted by Frank Beck View Post
    There is no way that Metallic Gold could dethrone Sepia Brown as the worst color.

    Not even a debate here.


    Like most metallics gold can look magnificent when presented in bristol condition.

    But when it's aged, faded, and clear coat is showing its age it doesn't fair so well.
    +2
    I just can't figure out the appeal of Sepia. I suspect it has become desirable to a select few which is why I've seen several sepia longhoods come up for sale recently. Dump them for a nice profit while you can before they fall completely out of fashion again. I flushed a prettier color this morning.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.