Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 21

Thread: Details about a 1966S

  1. #11
    Senior Member 210bhp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    2,050
    Mine is older........
    3054XXS

    Regards
    Mike
    RS#1551(sold)
    67S
    73E (home after 25 years) and sold again
    Early S reg. #681

  2. #12
    Senior Member Haasman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    N.Calif., south of SF
    Posts
    1,965
    Here is a little known fact, and I believe the change took place with the 1967 cars: Right inside the exhaust pipes flanges (both left and right) there were small ridges welded in to reduce horse power slightly. It was my understanding this was done because autos at that time were insured in Germany by horsepower rating. These flanges lowered the rated horsepower within a particular HP range.

    On my 65/66 car (#302580) I did this and the difference was significant in engine response.
    Last edited by Haasman; 05-19-2015 at 07:33 PM.
    Haasman

    Registry #2489
    R Gruppe #722
    65 911 #302580
    70 914-6 #9140431874
    73 911s #9113300709

  3. #13
    Early 911S Registry # 237 NeunElf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    San Dimas, CA
    Posts
    1,809
    Quote Originally Posted by Haasman View Post
    Here is a little know fact, and I believe the change took place with the 1967 cars: Right inside the exhaust pipes flanges (both left and right) there were small ridges welded in to reduce horse power slightly. It was my understanding this was done because autos at that time were insured in Germany by horsepower rating. These flanges lowered the rated horsepower within a particular HP range.

    On my 65/66 car (#302580) I did this and the difference was significant in engine response.
    Bruce Anderson talks about such exhaust restrictors in Porsche 911 Performance Handbook on page 56 (second edition) right after describing the 40IDA-3C carbs with a stamped "S". According to Bruce, the new exhaust system developed for the 911S added about 10 hp to "normal" cars in Model Year 1967. According to Bruce, Porsche wanted to maintain a roughly 30 hp difference between the "Normal" and "S" engines so they added restrictor rings to the exhaust. About November 1966 Porsche switched to a milder camshaft and removed the exhaust restrictors.
    Jim Alton
    Torrance, CA
    Early 911S Registry # 237

    1965 Porsche 911 coupe
    1958 Porsche 356A cabriolet

  4. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Duesseldorf / NRW / Germany
    Posts
    192
    Hi Eric and Elferhelfer ,

    The first day of production for the 911 s was the 21 th of July in 1966 . My S is one off them , vin 305133s.

    regards,

    Michael

  5. #15
    Senior Member 911T1971's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    3,008
    VIN 305141 is in France..built July 21th 1966 (MODELYEAR 1967)
    http://www.early911sregistry.org/for...ess+67S+french

    This is xxx141 with Ferry Porsche
    Last edited by 911T1971; 05-20-2015 at 11:18 AM.
    Registry member No.773

  6. #16
    Senior Member Milou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Geneva
    Posts
    1,981
    I noticed in Essen that cars were often presented by built date and not model year which drove me crazy. It took me a while to fully intergrate the difference between the calendar year and the Porsche model year and I thought I was up to speed and now more and more people are going back to built year.

    Yes a 1966 911S never existed, alhough they technically did, but let's stick to model years for clarity.

    Has the topic been discussed here? Just kidding

    PS: Apologies for disturbing the original discussion of this thread

    Milou / Registry #884
    www.ecurielyford.com

  7. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    California
    Posts
    719
    I own a late August build #3056XXS comes with IDA's. Happens to be an aga blue SR coupe.

  8. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by rmfent View Post
    I own a late August build #3056XXS comes with IDA's. Happens to be an aga blue SR coupe.
    Pictures please, I am currently starting the restoration of my 67 S, build date May 67' Aga blue and will have a few personal touches (sports purpose look)

    Thanks mark

  9. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Duesseldorf / NRW / Germany
    Posts
    192
    stock aga blue 67,
    Name:  67aga.jpg
Views: 249
Size:  166.8 KB

  10. #20

    "66S" prior to ch nbr 305758?

    OK, here is a question that has had me wondering for the past several years.

    What is the difference in the early chassis that would account for the footnote on the Werks Service Bulletin Nr.2 5/67 regarding roll bar installation that states that fitment of a roll bar subsequent to delivery is not possible on an S chassis prior to ch. nbr. 305758?
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Early 911S Registry
    Looking for engine 960 168
    Looking for gear box 103 165

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.