Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 66

Thread: Seinfeld vs. SCM: restore or enjoy the patina

  1. #1

    Seinfeld vs. SCM: restore or enjoy the patina

    Pretty good articles in the latest sports car market. (you can buy the feb issue on your tablet if that's easier). Apparently Seinfeld bought a rusty speedster that was panned in the SCM analysis as too expensive for the condition... He defends his purchase pretty well on grounds or originality and patina, vs Restorations that strip the car's history... followed by a rebuttal from Miles Collier. Very interesting re: the direction of the hobby, and where we fall. Check it out!

    Ps: shouldn't say rusty, the actual chassis condition is a bit of a debate. Let's say cosmetically representative of 58 years of use ��
    Greg.
    ----------
    72 911T - 73 2002
    #1461

  2. #2
    I've rebuilt several of Jerry's Porsche transmissions, and currently have a Speedster transmission of his to do- from the description, probably the same car.
    My understanding is that this Speedster will be a "driver", similar to a very good example we could have found in the 1960's or 70's, and not restored to show standards.
    He plans to drive it and enjoy it, sort of like we did with these things 40+ years ago...

    Jon B.
    Vista, CA

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,580
    Miles and Fred (Daytona Coupe) are huge proponents of preservation.

    I'm picking up a slight trend back to restoration. Several of this year's Pebble Beach original cars are now being restored. Once the owners secured the originality award they're having them restored so they can also have a 2nd award for the same car.

    Keep in mind that there is now commonly accepted definition of originality. Each marque defines it differently. Here's an article on that.

    Richard Newton

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    5,564
    Quote Originally Posted by Richardnew View Post
    Miles and Fred (Daytona Coupe) are huge proponents of preservation.

    I'm picking up a slight trend back to restoration. Several of this year's Pebble Beach original cars are now being restored. Once the owners secured the originality award they're having them restored so they can also have a 2nd award for the same car.

    Keep in mind that there is now commonly accepted definition of originality. Each marque defines it differently. Here's an article on that.

    Richard Newton
    Richard

    Just a slight addition to your post. Once an unrestored car wins an award at Pebble Beach, it is no longer allowed to enter in the Unrestored class. Owners are left with few options, sell the car (it still can't be re-entered) drive the crap out of the thing or restore it.

    Regards

    Jim
    Last edited by Jim Breazeale; 01-22-2016 at 07:07 AM.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Sepia911S's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    537
    After the 911S won the Preservation Award at the Traverse City Parade, several PCA members took me aside and shared their philosophy that a car should only win that award once. "After winning, give someone else a chance." I agree.

    At Parade, the ladies ask, "When are you going to compete again?" I just shake my head no ... once is enough. The men always ask, "Did you bring the car?" The differences in point of view is interesting.

    The thought of entering Sepia in the street class has crossed my mind. What would happen?
    Last edited by Sepia911S; 01-22-2016 at 01:42 PM.
    Candyce
    '73 911S, #9113301365
    Early S Registry #2027

  6. #6
    Vintageracer John Straub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    La Quinta
    Posts
    3,184
    And the cars should be driven to and from the show.

    John
    Last edited by John Straub; 01-23-2016 at 05:34 PM.
    1959 356 Coupe, 1600 Super, sold
    1960 356 Roaster, race car, SCCA, sold
    1960 356 Roadster, show car, sold.
    1962 356 Cab, show car, sold.
    1965 911 #301111, Red Book Vol 1 "Cover Car," owned 54 years.
    1967 911 #307347, bare-bones, some road wear, a little surface rust, and a few dents..., owned 14 years.
    1970 914/6GT, (Sold - ran the last three Rennsports)owned 30 years.


    Photography Site: JohnStraubImageWorks.com

    Registry #983
    R Gruppe #741

  7. #7
    Senior Member Milou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Geneva
    Posts
    1,981
    Could JS be selling his "over-restored" cars and focus his collection on preserved cars? Maybe that's why he's selling at Gooding?

    Milou / Registry #884
    www.ecurielyford.com

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Milou View Post
    Could JS be selling his "over-restored" cars and focus his collection on preserved cars? Maybe that's why he's selling at Gooding?
    I think you hit the nail on the head.....laughable that anyone thinks JS is selling because he sees a "bubble" about to pop.

  9. #9
    I think that when you have too much toys you can't play with all of them.

    So....he would like to sell the toys he didn't use and buy others new toys.

    With his money he can buy all the toys he wants

  10. #10
    aka techweenie Eminence Gris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    West Los Angeles
    Posts
    3,098
    Anecdotally, Seinfeld is a fan of patina. But he also has at least one hot rod - a 71 coupe built by RUF with a 4 liter engine, which I've seen up close and personal. So he seems to appreciate a variety of Porsches for different reasons. Not that there's anything wrong with that.
    techweenie.com

    My parts fetcher: 2016 Tesla S | Currently building: 73 RSR tribute and 69 RS tribute

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.