Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 24 of 24

Thread: Question on 68 driveshafts one year only

  1. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,701
    Thanks. Would that make them correct for a 68 build then Gordon.? I ask because 68 was a strange year.

  2. #22
    Nadella
    Lobro
    Name:  911_65-69_Fig3-05-00_Differential,-'67,#17,ClosingCap_800x600.jpg
Views: 137
Size:  70.7 KB Name:  911_65-69_Fig5-01-10,DriveShaftLobro,#7,8,9_800x600.jpg
Views: 141
Size:  86.4 KB
    PET '65-'69 911 Fig 3/05-00, #17
    901.332.239.02
    Closing cap
    PET '65-'69 911 Fig 5/01-10, #07
    901.332.239.10
    Cap
    Name:  906_AxleFlangeCap_04_800x600x72.jpg
Views: 125
Size:  403.2 KB Name:  LobroLSD_FlangeCap04_800x600.jpg
Views: 142
Size:  414.5 KB

  3. #23
    Quote Originally Posted by gled49 View Post
    I've also done lots of 904 LSD's in 901 boxes with Nadella drive flanges and the same with Lobro conversion drive flanges, all of those took a hammer in cap with no O ring. Clarification please on jimmy t parts. Gordon
    Gordon, the Nadella drive flanges used tap-in caps without O-rings, as you said. Löbro flanges did not use Nadella caps.
    These are original Nadella caps with a ZF limited-slip drive flange, the same as Jimmy's caps on the left, and #17 in the illustration. I didn't know that Jimmy was making Nadella caps as well.

    Name:  DSCN0400.jpg
Views: 134
Size:  123.1 KB

    Jon B.
    Vista, CA

  4. #24
    Member #226 R Gruppe Life Member #147
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    2,355
    In my post #18, the gearbox pictured has a 904 LSD, with Lobro conversion drive flanges and tap in caps. Nice to see jimmy's caps.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.