Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 46

Thread: Bad oil for our engines

  1. #31
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    568

    PennGrade = Brad Penn?

    Just to confirm for someone who has used Brad Penn for years, PennGrade is the same product from the same manufacturer?

    Thanks,

    Bob
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    1973 911E - Viper Green
    1973 911T - Light Ivory, becoming Glacier Blue RS

  2. #32
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    1,095
    Quote Originally Posted by RTincher View Post
    Just to confirm for someone who has used Brad Penn for years, PennGrade is the same product from the same manufacturer?

    Thanks,

    Bob
    Bob:

    From what I can gather, PennGrade is the same oil as Brad-Penn which is the same oil as the original Kendall GT1. They are all refined by the same refinery in Bradford Pennsylvania and fed from the ocal Pennsylvania wells. Years ago I looked into all of this. Besides the oil being green, it also has an unusually high level of sodium.
    Harry

    Member #789
    1970 VW Sunroof Kombi Bus - "The Magic Bus"
    1973.5 911T Targa for fun - "Smokey"
    2009 MB C300

  3. #33
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    568
    Harry, thanks for clarifying this.

    Bob
    1973 911E - Viper Green
    1973 911T - Light Ivory, becoming Glacier Blue RS

  4. #34
    I've been using the Penngrade oil in my car since it's rebuild. Recently I've had suggestions to move to Liqui Moly. Is there any consensus on which of these 2 is preferred in our engines?
    1969 911E Ossie Blau
    Member 2905

  5. #35
    Moderator Chuck Miller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Reseda, CA.
    Posts
    12,458
    I used Kendall GT-1 for over 40 years until they were bought by ConocoPhillips, changed the formula, and then told me it was the same....

    I've been with BradPenn/Penngrade 20-50 ever since with no complaints....

    cm
    Chuck Miller
    Creative Advisor/Message Board Moderator - Early 911S Registry #109
    R Gruppe #88

    TYP901 #62
    '73S cpe #1099 - Matched # 2.7/9.5 RS spec rebuild
    '67 Malibu 327 spt cpe - Period 350 Rebuild

    ’98 Chevy S-10 – Utility
    ’15 GTI – Commuter

  6. #36
    There's a thread on Pelican that's years in the making.

    http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsc...4-sm-oils.html

    Early S Registry #235
    rgruppe #111

  7. #37
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    1,095
    Times have changed. I recently saw this posted by Bill Verberg at the Bird (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsc...4-sm-oils.html):

    I was browsing another oil thread and found this post by Bill Verburg. Looks like some significant changes in our favored oils.

    Quote Originally Posted by Bill Verburg View Post
    There have definitely been formulation changes in some oils over the last 10 yrs.

    LN Engineering puts out an informative series of updates on this topic

    here is the latest detailing changes in Brad Penn and VR1

    LN is recommending the newest line of Driven oils, specifically Driven GP-1 20w-50 or 15w-40 for the aircooled cars

    I see no change in M1 15w-50 and will continue to use it in my cars.
    and this by me:

    Quote Originally Posted by HarryD View Post
    I have been having some conversations with other about alternative oils to try. As Adias notes, Liqui Moly has some products that may be pretty good.

    The two that seem to make sense to me are: Liqui Moly Hi Tech (API SL - https://products.liqui-moly.com/oils...-20w-50-1.html)

    and

    Liqui Moly Classic (API SE - https://products.liqui-moly.com/oils...20w-50-hd.html)
    Harry

    Member #789
    1970 VW Sunroof Kombi Bus - "The Magic Bus"
    1973.5 911T Targa for fun - "Smokey"
    2009 MB C300

  8. #38
    Senior Member DanielJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Olympic Peninsula
    Posts
    102
    http://stlouisncrs.org/news_files/St..._July_2011.pdf

    The above link contains some useful information on oil and it’s formulation as well as the API classifications. Scroll through the article until you find the information written by Duke WIlliams.

    I deffer to Duke because I’ve owned early Corvettes that have engines with sliding surfaces and just like Porsche guys, early Corvette owners are just as passionate over the oil religion.

    Further, I like to change the oil in all of my cars. It makes me think I’m a great mechanic, and, clearly, I am not great at much of anything.

    While on the subject of mechanics that see the internals of our Porsche engines on a daily basis, if Mr. Beck says BP is the go to oil, you should listen to what he has to say.

    Back to the attached article, it goes into depth over CJ-4 oil. Worth to note at this point in time, CJ-4 has been replaced by CK-4 ratings. Google the difference.

    My time frame for oil change is annually or 3K miles on all of my engines with “sliding surface” interfaces and rarely does any one of these cars see 3K miles in a year save for my ‘59 356.



    DJ.
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  9. #39
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    1,095
    Quote Originally Posted by DanielJ View Post
    http://stlouisncrs.org/news_files/St..._July_2011.pdf

    The above link contains some useful information on oil and it’s formulation as well as the API classifications. Scroll through the article until you find the information written by Duke WIlliams.

    I deffer to Duke because I’ve owned early Corvettes that have engines with sliding surfaces and just like Porsche guys, early Corvette owners are just as passionate over the oil religion.

    Further, I like to change the oil in all of my cars. It makes me think I’m a great mechanic, and, clearly, I am not great at much of anything.

    While on the subject of mechanics that see the internals of our Porsche engines on a daily basis, if Mr. Beck says BP is the go to oil, you should listen to what he has to say.

    Back to the attached article, it goes into depth over CJ-4 oil. Worth to note at this point in time, CJ-4 has been replaced by CK-4 ratings. Google the difference.

    My time frame for oil change is annually or 3K miles on all of my engines with “sliding surface” interfaces and rarely does any one of these cars see 3K miles in a year save for my ‘59 356.



    DJ.
    Daniel:

    While I agree with 99% of your post, recent changes to the additive packages (as I have noted above) have lessened my support of BP 20W-50 oil for MY car.

    FWIW, I have been using BP since the early '90's and when I needed to get my top end redone a few years ago (due to my stupidity), the internals looked great.

    After I read the LN engineering article http://campaign.r20.constantcontact....c-362ab1508928, I consulted with my local "experts" and they told me they have moved from BP to the Driven GP-1 product. Given that they have seen and repaired more engines than I will ever do in my lifetime, I trust their judgement.

    Of course, you, like anyone else, is free to make their own choices.
    Harry

    Member #789
    1970 VW Sunroof Kombi Bus - "The Magic Bus"
    1973.5 911T Targa for fun - "Smokey"
    2009 MB C300

  10. #40
    Senior Member michaelaiellosr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    New York/Florida
    Posts
    384
    I am most impressed by people in the business of commercial automotive lubrication as a livelihood. Anyone wanting to know more might google anything by Richard Widman. For instance, Selection of the Right Motor Oil for the Corvair and other Engines By Richard Widman. https://www.widman.biz/uploads/Corvair_oil.pdf Probably more than you wanted to know.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.