Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 23

Thread: Thoughts on using a 911/01 vs 915 gearbox in front of a 2.8 twin, in a '68 SWB 911

  1. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Texas Gulf Coast
    Posts
    249
    Can any of y'all with a keen eye and experience tell from these photos what was done on the 1968 912/6 that sold on B.A.T. a few months ago? https://bringatrailer.com/listing/1968-porsche-911-9/



    Name:  1968_porsche_911_1537986823cd208491968-Porsche-911-R-Type-A-GC.com-163.jpg
Views: 315
Size:  80.2 KBName:  1968_porsche_911_15379868715ef66e7dff9f98764d1968-Porsche-911-R-Type-A-GC.com-148.jpg
Views: 274
Size:  108.2 KBName:  1968_porsche_911_153798686166e7dff9f98764da1968-Porsche-911-R-Type-A-GC.com-152.jpg
Views: 315
Size:  95.7 KBName:  1968_porsche_911_15379868678764da1968-Porsche-911-R-Type-A-GC.com-150.jpg
Views: 319
Size:  75.0 KB

  2. #12
    Member #226 R Gruppe Life Member #147
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    2,355
    If I had to guess I'd say those were VW type 2 CV joints that have the same bolt pattern as 100mm drive flanges in eather coarse or fine spline. I'm not sure how the axle spline to type 2 CV is handled. G

  3. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Santa Monica CA
    Posts
    2,042
    Hi JMZ-- I assume you are doing JE pistons or something. Because if you are using 92mm RSR pistons on standard heads, you compression ratio would be about 12 to 1. Also if you are using a aluminum case--that's fine. If you are using a MAG case, my tech says it cannot take the high stresses of a 92mm x70.4 crank. He showed me a 2.8 engine made with a mag case and it had a crack and was useless. Although the owner was racing with it. I guess if you are just on the street and not keeping the rpm's at 6000 all day, you might be OK. Chris
    1. Chris-Early S Registry#205
    2. '70 911S Tangerine
    3. '68 911L Euro Ossi Blue

  4. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Texas Gulf Coast
    Posts
    249
    Quote Originally Posted by raspy2point2 View Post
    Hi JMZ-- I assume you are doing JE pistons or something. Because if you are using 92mm RSR pistons on standard heads, you compression ratio would be about 12 to 1. Also if you are using a aluminum case--that's fine. If you are using a MAG case, my tech says it cannot take the high stresses of a 92mm x70.4 crank. He showed me a 2.8 engine made with a mag case and it had a crack and was useless. Although the owner was racing with it. I guess if you are just on the street and not keeping the rpm's at 6000 all day, you might be OK. Chris
    I get it. I've got some pros working on the engine and yes I've got all the bad stuff. ...RSR pistons, mag case and standard heads. I had concerns and they've got the details worked out and have the compression ratio down to something that works with pump gas etc. I think it's going to be a fun little toy.

  5. #15
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Scottsdale, AZ
    Posts
    9,752
    Quote Originally Posted by Jon B View Post
    Frank, those flanges are for CV joints with 94mm bolt circles, not 94mm diameters. They're basically aftermarket 108mm 85> flanges that use six M10 bolts.
    Maybe I don't understand the fix you're suggesting?

    Jon B.
    Vista, CA
    You're correct Jon; Martin doesn't build the 78mm bolt circle flanges. I like Gordon have drilled out 914-4 flanges and installed inserts. But that's only if one has the course spline diff.

  6. #16
    Member #226 R Gruppe Life Member #147
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    2,355
    Raspy, one of my 2.8's with Mahle's, Mag case, S cams, twin plug and MFI, just came off the dyno with 252hp. Comp was 10.2, done it many times, takes a little work, but for a street motor there's nothing like Mahle P&C's. G

  7. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Northern VA
    Posts
    574
    I second this. Not as strong as a sandcast case (absolute best choice) but can be made pretty durable. I’ve got a 7r that has been dowel pinned, 70.4 by 92 rsr w a little work to get the compression within workable bounds. Twin plug, ge60, mfi HB and is a fun motor. Take it to 7800 all the time.

    An early mag case would be far from my first choice, but there have been plenty of them out there that have made them work and last under tough conditions.

  8. #18
    You won’t need to put on plastic door handles, or hole saw your wooden floor boards if you run the type 911 trans
    Tom F.

    '67 911S Slate Gray
    '70 911T 2.8 hotrod (in progress)
    '92 964

    #736

  9. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Texas Gulf Coast
    Posts
    249
    Quote Originally Posted by tfiv View Post
    You won’t need to put on plastic door handles, or hole saw your wooden floor boards if you run the type 911 trans
    Hadn't thought about weight, That should come into play too I suppose.

  10. #20
    Ollie’s gets about $3500 now for a full meal mag case deal. Guys are pretty proud of those sand cast cases these days too though. If memory serves there’s nearly a 30 lb difference.
    Tom F.

    '67 911S Slate Gray
    '70 911T 2.8 hotrod (in progress)
    '92 964

    #736

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.