View Poll Results: Sugar Scoop or RoW ?

Voters
37. You may not vote on this poll
  • Sugar Scoop

    6 16.22%
  • RoW

    31 83.78%
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: Sugar Scoop or H1/H4 ?

  1. #11
    Junior Member dca911t's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Eagle, Id 83616
    Posts
    14
    I changed out the stock head lamps on my 70T in September of 1972. I put the original headlamps in the Bosch box and have never looked back at wanting the stock headlights.

    20190609_120728_0002.jpg

    image1.jpg

    20190531_162553_0002.jpg
    David C. Allen
    1970 911T 2.2

  2. #12
    Serial old car rescuer Arne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Eugene, OR
    Posts
    603
    LOL!! H1s for $39 each!
    - Arne

    In Progress
    - 1972 911T coupe, born (and someday will be again) Silver
    Sold - 1984 911 Carrera coupe, Chiffon white; 1973 914 2.0, Saturn Yellow; 1984 944, Silver Metallic

  3. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Bellingham, WA
    Posts
    123
    I still have my sugar scoops on. I installed H-4s 40 years ago, & recently upgraded to LEDs

  4. #14
    Senior Member METAVINYL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    SANTA CRUZ, CA.
    Posts
    477
    I realized that in my photos I actually have H4's in the scoops. Sorry about that. I didn't mean to make it a 'trick' question. I should have made 3 options:

    RoW
    DOT Scoop (for the concourse purist)
    Scoop w/ H4 conversion (the compromise)
    Member # 3245

    1955 356 Sunroof Coupe
    1971 911E Coupe
    1974 911 Coupe

  5. #15
    H1 or H4 over sugar scoops all day

  6. #16
    Plus the sugar scoops are not as aerodynamically efficient as H1 or H4

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.