Page 3 of 52 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 517

Thread: A Proposal to Establish Member Control of the ESR

  1. #21
    Senior Member NZVW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Auckland NZ
    Posts
    1,009
    Quote Originally Posted by Simonjjb View Post
    do you think, beyond being sad, that the proposals are bad ?
    Na Not At All,,

    Thinking that,, "the cat has swallowed its tongue,,, and the budgie", SJ on this aspect.

    Most importantly though is that the forum has been as will remain 'exactly that'.

    A fantastic forum that covers its arse by membership contributions and one that it's members should have a "say or vote" on who has the right to emit, edit or terminate not only a 'post' but the individual completely , not to mention total clarity of it financial and 'inhouse policies"..

    I dont want to see 'public stoning's' reintroduced nor do I feel that a single person should yield total power of 'our' forum.

    Mugabe was the end of an era and I am grateful for that.

    Clarity and transparency in the Boards commitments to us as paying members creates an 'open' playground for the likeminded and it's subject simpatico family to express, advise and educate within.

    ESR is going to go through change and that is normal.

    The 935 factory poster " There are leaders and there are followers' does not always apply but the foundation laid by those that have been 'corner stones'
    of ESR have my respect for being Porschasites.

    Good night to all.

    God Bless.
    Mark

  2. #22
    Senior Member StephenAcworth's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Chelsea, Québec
    Posts
    2,551
    Hi
    It saddens me that people think that asking for a civilized discussion about introducing some transparency about how our beloved forum and registry is run, and perhaps changing the involvement of the paid membership is perceived as ‘tearing itself apart’.
    How can it be wrong to ask to have a discussion?
    On another point, in any volunteer role I’ve had, I’ve always been looking to increase the engagement with others and getting people to be more active in the running of the organization so they appreciate the effort that goes into maintaining the smooth running of the organization. I have never experienced a board that is obviously over-stretched reduce the number of the board and resist the help of others. To me, that doesn’t make sense.
    I don’t want to do anything but help to make this forum and the ESR stronger and healthier and have a more vibrant future.
    Our passion is already quite marginal (look at the number of paying members) - it would be insane to try to fragment it!
    So, let’s have an open and fair discussion amongst paying members.
    Sincerely
    Stephen

    Quote Originally Posted by ejboyd5 View Post
    Another site had a comment that ESR was in the process of tearing itself apart. Until reading this post I was blissfully unaware of potentially existential conflict. Thanks for moving the issue out of "Off Topic" to a place where it can be considered by all who may be concerned.
    1966 911 Coupe - Slate Grey - 304598

    Member # 1616

  3. #23
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Shell Beach, Calif.
    Posts
    128
    @ Jim Amato

    He was easily ignored.....but I like the nickname
    Last edited by Tom Michelsen; 09-07-2019 at 06:23 AM.
    1969 912 tangerine coupe 82K original miles
    1974 911 red targa 71K original miles

    Tom Michelsen
    Central Coast Heaven

    Shell Beach, California

  4. #24
    Hi, thanks for your effort.

    Point 1 to 5 looks reasonable and will bring clarity for the future. Nevertheless, there is a need to clearly distinguish between "the club" and "the forum" ... for the latter, the complex procedures hinted at point 6 looks a little bit overkilling to me ... especially when we think to a forum with thousands of registered members and volunteer moderator(s). Point 7 ok, with the caviat above.

    Following the evolution with interest and optimism.

    Krgds

    Massimo
    Member #2768 http://www.no-speedlimit.it

    • 1973 Biancaneve - 911 2.4 S/F Ivory
    • 1977 Fiona - 911 Carrera 3.0 Oak Green Metallic
    • 1993 Bellatrix - 964 Turbo 3.6 Black

    I keep a registry of 1972 and 1973 2.4 S coupé chassis. Infos always welcome!!!

  5. #25
    Oil Cooled Heart Bullethead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    South Florida
    Posts
    1,574
    Nice work John, please add me to the list.
    Russ

    ESR # 1537

    '62 356S Notchback Hotrod
    '67 S Das Geburtstagsgeschenk
    '68 T Targa Sporto
    '70 914/6 GT

  6. #26
    I tried... jaudette3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Sisters, Oregon
    Posts
    3,287

    Transparency

    When I got married my minister said he had just one piece of advice for us: “Always keep communicating honestly.”. It’s worked for 52 years so far.

    Why am I telling you this? There’s another word for honest communication - transparency. So often a lack of communication, a lack of openness, a lack of transparency, leads to conflict. If the ESR had been open and transparent from the beginning this kerfuffle would have never occurred. When folks aren’t open with you it’s just human nature for us to suspect that something is being hidden, perhaps an agenda.

    John’s proposed changes are to me simple, logical, non-disruptive — and much needed. They will make us a tighter group as member involvement is increased. They will also give us a solid position to defend from should a serious situation arise, such as what happened at the 356 Registry.

    It usually requires a catalyst of some kind to foment change. I’m very happy that this could be the outcome of our little period of friction. So I’m willing to help.

    John
    Last edited by jaudette3; 09-07-2019 at 08:46 AM.

    John Audette - Porsche Lighting Anorak
    Concours Restoration of SWB/LWB Headlamps & Turn Signals, H1's & H4's + LED’s
    The Air Cooled 911 Light Resource => AudetteCollection.com

  7. #27
    With his approval, I just added Russell Hibbard's name to the members supporting this proposal. Other members who wish to add their name and share their support publicly can message me and I'll be happy to add them as well.
    Member # 2530
    The early ones...
    1965 911 (301100), 1965 911 (301331), 1967 912/6, 1968 912 Soft Window Targa, 1969 911S Soft Window Targa, 1969 912 Coupe, 1969 912 Sunroof Coupe, 1970 911T Sunroof Coupe, 1972 911T Coupe, 1973 911S Targa

  8. #28
    Quote Originally Posted by LongRanger View Post
    Instead --- it's come to this . . . Old Men arguing about The Rules
    Who's old?
    Member # 2530
    The early ones...
    1965 911 (301100), 1965 911 (301331), 1967 912/6, 1968 912 Soft Window Targa, 1969 911S Soft Window Targa, 1969 912 Coupe, 1969 912 Sunroof Coupe, 1970 911T Sunroof Coupe, 1972 911T Coupe, 1973 911S Targa

  9. #29
    member #1515
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    San Antonio, Texas
    Posts
    3,760
    I don't understand why having clear governance of a non-profit is such a point of conflict.
    We all are joined together by our love of these old cars. This has always been a great place to exchange information on these cars. It would be a shame to see it disappear at some point because of a lack of a clear and open succession plan. Three old guys*, sitting around selecting buddies to substitute each other is not exactly the best procedure. We now have members from all over the world, some of whom have skills that would be very useful to the organization.
    By broadening the board, having term limits and making us true Members of this organization we assure the future of this site.
    Why is anyone afraid of democracy and transparency?

    * by the way I think I'm in the same age group as at least two of the current directors.
    David

    '73 S Targa #0830 2.7 MFI rebuilt to RS specs

  10. #30
    Quote Originally Posted by mrar View Post
    if it's not broken don't fix it.
    That's interesting.

    Jorge, why don't you take this as an opportunity to jump in and explain exactly how "broke" the ESR was when you joined and how much is left to be done? The content of our blunt conversation yesterday, and the specific details regarding the condition of the ESR that led to you joining the board, will be eye-opening to many of the members.
    Member # 2530
    The early ones...
    1965 911 (301100), 1965 911 (301331), 1967 912/6, 1968 912 Soft Window Targa, 1969 911S Soft Window Targa, 1969 912 Coupe, 1969 912 Sunroof Coupe, 1970 911T Sunroof Coupe, 1972 911T Coupe, 1973 911S Targa

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.