Interesting that there is a raised area assumedly for the VIN stamp that was not utilized.
Interesting that there is a raised area assumedly for the VIN stamp that was not utilized.
Peter Kane
'72 911S Targa
Message Board Co-Moderator - Early 911S Registry #100
Correct. Would like to see more early 64 stamps... and where they are located.... Very hand made at this time 6 cars per day.
t
1965 911 Factory Paint to Sample Orange
1967 911S Bahama Yellow
1968 911 S Blood Orange
1971 911S Gold Metallic Peter Gregg
1974 Carrera RS Blue Metallic
1990 RUF RCT Estonia's car
Hello experts,
What year do you think this seat is?
Thanks,
Philippe
Looks like an early seat.. No headrest... 65 or earlier. The 64 Seats would have 6 pleats in them instead of 5. Of course that could have been redone years ago.
Tate
1965 911 Factory Paint to Sample Orange
1967 911S Bahama Yellow
1968 911 S Blood Orange
1971 911S Gold Metallic Peter Gregg
1974 Carrera RS Blue Metallic
1990 RUF RCT Estonia's car
i`d say a 65Originally Posted by 300090
a 64 seat and an early 65 would look like this
in the worx...
some early cars (like #13) had the vin in the raised area.
at around 300130 they began to play a bit with the positions(even stamped them twice )up to ca. 300180
the raised area moved down at around vin 300800
also the tag and the stamping changed several times
need a bit more time to have something presentable
Last edited by moito; 10-16-2019 at 01:35 PM.
+1 moito....
@franz
you still have the seat pics of #57 with the „rubberflap“?
above pic from your momentary built?
br
haul
59 750 pre unit triton
63 650 gray silver bikinitub triumph thunderbird
70 650 astralred silver triumph bonneville
65 912 slate gray "erwin"
73 914 ravennagreen "ferdl"
erwin_loves_polo
I had never noticed the part indicated by the arrow.
Does the presence of this "protection" make it possible to determine whether a seat dates from 1964 eventually from the very beginning of 1965?
64 seat:
(my) 65 seat: no "protection":
Thanks,
Philippe
Hello experts,
The 300090 needs a pair of front seats.
These seats must therefore have been manufactured between 1964 and the beginning of 1965.
Besides the six folds (which may have been replaced), could you please tell us other special features that will allow us to determine if a front seat is correct or not for a 1964 911?
Thanks,
Philippe
Hi all,
I'm happy to continue to share with you about the 300090.
Here are some pictures of the original rear bumpers.
On both the bumper brackets we find the 90 number punched.
These are not those that were installed but I got them back with some other parts when I bought the car.
25 years ago I didn't imagine how important it will be (today) to have original parts.
They are in so poor condition that I thought to throw them several times...
"ouf !"
Philippe
PS: Any information about how to recognize 1964 front seats? See my previous post. Thanks.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote