Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20

Thread: My 925 sporto blew up and and I can not figure out why

  1. #1

    My 925 sporto blew up and and I can not figure out why

    Guys,
    First the problem:

    Driving my 73 S 925 sportomatic at a constant speed on the Interstate, with no warning indications, there was a loud bang and the speedometer quit working. When I got back to the garage (slowly and 3 miles later), I noticed that there was a circular piece of metal about 2.5 inches in diameter missing from the center of the front cover plate (the one the shifter rod goes through). It appears that the speedometer drive gear retaining bolt had punctured the front case.

    Now that the engine is out, the front cover is off, and I have inspected more closely, the female threads that capture the speedometer drive gear retaining bolt have stripped, which seems to have caused the retaining bolt to launch itself through the front nose cover piece.

    So now the WTF questions:

    1. Has anybody ever seen a sportomatic problem like this before?
    2. Does anybody know what caused this to happen?
    3. I have a new speedo drive gear and stretch bolt from Porsche. Can I just put a time cert in the female end and re-assemble or is more tear down and more parts required.

    The good news is that I have a spare 925 transmission from a parts car and hope to be able to source any NLA stuff from the spare trans. But I would like to keep the sporto installed and running in this car.

    Any thoughts, help and direction sincerely appreciated.

    John
    member #322

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    35,000 ft
    Posts
    2,011
    Where are you located? I know a guy in Phoenix who could help....bock? Buck??? Something like that....can’t remember.
    looking for 1972 911t motor XR584, S/N 6121622

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by caproader View Post
    ... the female threads that capture the speedometer drive gear retaining bolt have stripped, which seems to have caused the retaining bolt to launch itself through the front nose cover piece...
    John, you're saying that #8 in the illustration blew through the front cover?

    The female threads for that bolt are part of the pinion shaft- if they're stripped, I doubt they can be repaired effectively.
    How do you know the female threads are stripped?

    Name:  DSCN1098.jpg
Views: 356
Size:  106.7 KB

    Jon B.
    Vista, CA

  4. #4
    Guys,
    Thanks for the replies. I am in Cincinnati. Yes it appears that the bolt listed as # 8 in the picture is the culprit. When I removed bolt #8 from the trans, pieces of thread came out with it. Additional fact: roughly two or three threads on the # 8 bolt were stripped. The rest of the #8 bolt threads appear to be normal. But there appears to be more than 2 turns of threading that come out with the bolt.

    Thanks again for the help.

    John

  5. #5
    John,

    The fastening torque for that bolt is 110-120 Nm, or 80-87 lbs-ft.
    You could install the new parts and see if the replacement bolt threads in cleanly, with sufficient engagement, and if so then see if you can torque it to spec.
    If the female threads are badly damaged or stripped, then the damaged pinion shaft should be replaced, meaning both the pinion and the ring gear.

    Here's another possible issue...

    That bolt holds the assembled pinion shaft together. Coming undone allowed the parts on the shaft to spread, and might have caused the pinion to push rearward into the ring gear.
    The whole gear cluster should really be removed and inspected for any damage caused by the bolt failure.

    Jon B.
    Vista, CA

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    NE Ohio
    Posts
    281
    in re Jon B's comments, ditto! Until you take apart the gearbox, you have no idea what lurks inside after an incident like the one you reported. Yes, you can just put in a new #8 bolt and if it torques down to spec you'll still be missing two rings of female threads for bite on the bolt. Take the time to inspect the gearbox. (IE, remove the gearstack not just for signs of failure but also to clean out all the little pieces of metal that are withouot doubt floating around in your gearbox.) . Our cars are not young anymore and quick fixes can lead to complete loss of other components. Plus, it sucks having to call for a flatbed when you are a few miles from home. I know that what Jon B and I are recommending is going to cost you some real money, but the alternative (total failure of the gearbox punching holes all over the case) would really suck, and even suck more if its a matching numbers case to your car.

  7. #7
    Senior Member jim amato's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    n.e. ohio
    Posts
    442
    John, If you need expert service in Ohio contact John Truman enterprises, Pm me if you need his number, over 40 years experience
    registry #2072

  8. #8
    Jim,

    PM sent to you for Truman Enterprises. Meantime, I agree with the comments that it is best to do it right and not try to slide by. This is a car with only 60k original miles and as I said, I want to keep it original, up to and including original numbers and all the pieces issued at the factory.

    John

    John

  9. #9
    Senior Member jim amato's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    n.e. ohio
    Posts
    442
    PM replied to, You cant go wrong with John Truman, Porsche factory trained, Old school, Worked as a tech for Stoddard when our cars were new
    registry #2072

  10. #10
    Thanks to all for the help. Called around to get as many data points as possible. Looks like the majority says to put in a helicoil, clean it up and reassemble. As they used to say on the news: "film at 11".

    John

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.