Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: PPF - Protective Paint Film

  1. #1
    Lighting Specialist jaudette3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Bend, Oregon
    Posts
    4,267

    PPF - Protective Paint Film

    What a dork! I actually asked on Instagram what PPF stood for. Admittedly I don’t get out much (you guys seem to have a lot of lights to restore), but really, how far behind can you get.

    Once I learned what it was I visited a high-end refinishing shop here in Bend - European Refinish Specialties - to learn more. The owner Mario was kind enough to show me around. They were in the process of installing PPF on a 993 GT2, just like this one:

    Name:  1E56DA3B-ABE4-41B5-852A-3244FE03D2F9.png
Views: 329
Size:  428.1 KB

    Of course everyone knows this already, but the end result was dead on perfection. But, oddly, I’m not sure that I care for it. I remember one time when I was detailing Stubby for a show and a friend said it looked great. I replied that I thought it looked too shiny. He said that that is impossible, there’s no such thing as too shiny. I dunno.

    I like a deep patina that it seems you can only get with single stage paint and hand warmed, hand applied, high quality carnuba wax. It’s beautiful and also has character and soul. After all, you can’t have character and soul without depth, right? A surface shine is kind of superficial.

    What do you think? Am I just old fashioned?

    Cheers,
    John
    Lighting Resources for Hardcore Air-Cooled Porsche Enthusiasts”
    ——-
    John Audette - Porsche Lighting Anorak
    AC Shop: BEST-IN-CLASS Air Cooled 911 Lighting Parts => 911BestInClass.com
    AC Site: The Air Cooled 911 Light Resource => AudetteCollection.com
    Instagram: Please Follow => AC Shop Instagram

  2. #2
    Senior Member TurkisTii's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    138
    I'd love to hear thoughts on PPF on an early 911. I have experience with Xpel on my newer cars with factory paint. My intent is to preserve the original paint and prevent rock chips. These are cars that I may take to the track as well. The paint on my Tangerine S is not original however it shows as a very high quality repaint. With that in mind and prepping for the 2020 driving season, I was considering getting Xpel on the hood and fenders. I haven't been a concours guy so not concerned about point deductions for having PPF.
    Early 911S Registry #3811
    '70 911S Coupe Tangerine
    Instagram @turkis.tii

  3. #3
    I don't consider a sandblasted front end to be a badge of honor...some do and that's fine. I have done PPF (I prefer SUNTEK) on my 72 hot rod, and on my previous 70 and 73 911-S cars. Also have it on my new 911s...full front on everything. A good installer can apply quality film and make it invisible...no concours points ever deducted for my cars with PPF because they look no different than the areas that are not covered - that's the key.

  4. #4
    Senior Member TurkisTii's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    138
    Quote Originally Posted by mac73s View Post
    I don't consider a sandblasted front end to be a badge of honor...some do and that's fine.
    +1

    I prefer SUNTEK.
    I only have experience with Xpel. I'm sure I can find comparisons online but interested in your reasons.

    no concours points ever deducted for my cars with PPF because they look no different than the areas that are not covered - that's the key.
    I made an assumption that there would be deduction as a local PCA concours judge/coach drives his 356 with one of those "old school" removable black bras. Maybe it's just a matter of preference.
    Early 911S Registry #3811
    '70 911S Coupe Tangerine
    Instagram @turkis.tii

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by TurkisTii View Post
    +1

    I only have experience with Xpel. I'm sure I can find comparisons online but interested in your reasons.

    I made an assumption that there would be deduction as a local PCA concours judge/coach drives his 356 with one of those "old school" removable black bras. Maybe it's just a matter of preference.
    My SUNTEK preference (been using SUNTEK ULTRA on the last few cars) is simply not visible so that's the reason I keep using it...obviously a combination of quality film and a quality installer. In days gone by, PPF was a mess...protective, but glaringly obvious. I would likely be entirely happy with EXPEL, it's just that the two installers I use are SUNTEK guys.

  6. #6
    Senior Member NickP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Solana Beach, CA
    Posts
    1,222
    Name:  ST at Buttonwillow.jpg
Views: 221
Size:  60.1 KBI love the stuff. I had the protective film installed on all the high impact area of my ST build after a high dollar Glasurit single stage paint job. Front bumper, hood, rockers, lower half of rear bumper. Man am I glad I did this. 3 years later, 10,000 miles and 8 track day later and there isn’t a chip or mark to be found where the protective film was added. The bottom pic shows the upper portion of the rear bumper where the crap from my sticky TB15’s inflict the most damage. Clearly, we didn’t go high enough on that portion (but the patina does look good to me!). The film works great and gives me great peace of mind regardless of where I drive. Modern Image in San Diego was the installer.
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Nick Psyllos
    S Reg & R Gruppe
    1973 Euro 911S
    1972 911T to ST

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.