Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 30 of 30

Thread: Who best to Authenticate an M-471 RS light weight seat ?

  1. 10-07-2020, 03:08 PM #21
    sithot
    sithot is offline
    Senior Member sithot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    7,746
    Real 471 lightweight photographed April 2004. Could have been taken home for about $125,000 if memory serves me. You could have bought a nice original standard car for $70,000+ money.
    Attached Images Attached Images   
    Early S Registry #235
    rgruppe #111
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 10-07-2020, 08:28 PM #22
    TB73
    TB73 is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    470
    Xxxxxxxxxxx
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 10-07-2020, 08:31 PM #23
    TB73
    TB73 is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    470
    Uai
    Are you certain these are Scheel Sliders ? .... would it Not be sensible to assume Recaro seats would have Recaro sliders ?
    Todd
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 10-07-2020, 09:57 PM #24
    uai
    uai is offline
    Senior Member uai's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Horb a.N. Germany
    Posts
    2,561
    Sorry again that’s a repop- 100% certain
    There is another question that we could raise at this occasion.
    Is the seat of the a homologation RS the same as from a RS lightweight production car?
    Last edited by uai; 10-07-2020 at 10:33 PM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 10-07-2020, 11:47 PM #25
    TB73
    TB73 is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    470
    Uai , no need for sorry .... I’m just trying to learn what these seats are , and learn something in general . RSH seats ..... let’s step back one question further “ how many RSH 2.7 RS’s were built ?
    T
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 10-08-2020, 07:57 AM #26
    TB73
    TB73 is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    470
    This is the RSH Sotheby’s sold 2018
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 10-08-2020, 09:58 AM #27
    MarkH
    MarkH is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    439
    I agree with Uli. Initial impression is positive. The fabric patina and general condition looks right but several details are not. I am fairly certain this is one of Bernd Beckers seats from the 80's. I bought several from him and they were excellent, much stronger than the originals. He also built the fixed back passenger seat in the RSH in post #26.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 10-08-2020, 10:37 AM #28
    TB73
    TB73 is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    470
    Thank you both for comments , do you agree that sliders are Scheel type ? Not Racaro Style ?

    T
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 10-08-2020, 01:13 PM #29
    uai
    uai is offline
    Senior Member uai's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Horb a.N. Germany
    Posts
    2,561
    Quote Originally Posted by TB73 View Post
    , do you agree that sliders are Scheel type ? Not Racaro Style ?

    T
    I think I can tell them apart - In another location I should have about another 10 to 15 pairs of the ones that are under your seat
    Name: CD41DA3D-F60E-4CB0-B98F-B6D570E4CB5D.jpeg Views: 277 Size: 126.5 KB
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 10-08-2020, 08:21 PM #30
    TB73
    TB73 is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    470
    I think that closes out this thread ! ..... again Thank you ��
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules


Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.