Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 4567 LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 64

Thread: Lawsuits Filed Against California Porsche Restoration

  1. #51
    And now Porsche are suing SINGER.



    Reminds me of Harley Davidson going after everyone using "Harley Davidson" for marketing BITD. Lots of T-Shirts went in the garbage.
    Early S Registry #235
    rgruppe #111

  2. #52
    Quote Originally Posted by CPRSteve View Post
    That was CPR East/Classic Porsche Restoration, and it's completely unaffiliated.

    I had a sit-down with them when they were getting their restoration shop up and running, but have had zero communication in many years.

    No reason for collateral damage to them or the PCA.
    But tons of collateral damage to customers of CPR Classic in Fallbrook, CA. CPR Classic in Fallbrook, CA sent me phony wire transfers, which is a crime. My hope is the courts come down hard against those that steal from others.
    Member #4215

    SCAM ALERT: 1972 911S Signal Orange Coupe VIN: 9112300505 is pending legal claim.
    BaT Auction cancelled due to pending legal issues: https://bringatrailer.com/listing/1972-porsche-911s-18/
    Additional fraud information and photos of 9112300505: https://public.fotki.com/BlueTTop/1972-porsche-911s-v/

  3. #53
    Senior Member patrick911's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Melbourne, AUS
    Posts
    529
    Quote Originally Posted by sithot View Post
    And now Porsche are suing SINGER.
    I don't know. Googling this it all goes back to this one single Youtube video from Outlaw garage.
    I haven't seen any sources listed or this seen mentioned anywhere else.
    Member #3508
    1973 911 2.4T
    1976 911S -> 2.8RSR replica
    "if nothing goes right, go left!"

  4. #54
    Early S Reg #1395 LongRanger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    California High Desert
    Posts
    14,443
    Quote Originally Posted by patrick911 View Post
    . . . I don't know. Googling this it all goes back to this one single Youtube video from Outlaw garage.
    I haven't seen any sources listed or this seen mentioned anywhere else
    . . .


    ?



    ...............................................
    Attached Images Attached Images  

    .........

    We Can Be Heroes

  5. #55
    Senior Member patrick911's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Melbourne, AUS
    Posts
    529
    Thank you - my Google skills are clearly not that good
    Member #3508
    1973 911 2.4T
    1976 911S -> 2.8RSR replica
    "if nothing goes right, go left!"

  6. #56
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Highlands,Nc
    Posts
    1,414
    Looks like Porsche and Singer came to an agreement.... The case was Voluntarily Dismissed by Porsche on 3/22
    1965 911 Factory Paint to Sample Orange
    1967 911S Bahama Yellow
    1968 911 S Blood Orange
    1971 911S Gold Metallic Peter Gregg
    1974 Carrera RS Blue Metallic
    1990 RUF RCT Estonia's car

  7. #57
    When you are looking at a company with these numbers it makes sense to "play ball".

    In 2023, Porsche made a profit of €7.3 billion ($12.1 billion), an improvement of 7.6 per cent or around €500 million over the previous year. Revenue grew by a similar percentage to €40.5 billion ($67 million). Its profit margin on sales remained stable at 18.0 per cent.

    Some other "Tuners" may get a letter too.
    Early S Registry #235
    rgruppe #111

  8. #58
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    5,587
    Quote Originally Posted by sithot View Post
    When you are looking at a company with these numbers it makes sense to "play ball".

    In 2023, Porsche made a profit of €7.3 billion ($12.1 billion), an improvement of 7.6 per cent or around €500 million over the previous year. Revenue grew by a similar percentage to €40.5 billion ($67 million). Its profit margin on sales remained stable at 18.0 per cent.

    Some other "Tuners" may get a letter too.
    Back in 2008, I attended a banquet hosted by the 356 Registry at their West Coast Holiday in Squaw Valley, Ca.( since renamed "Palisades" so as not to offend some snow flake). The key note speaker was the CFO of Porsche AG. He went on and on, while addressing a room full of Porsche addicts and potential customers, about the fact that Porsche made the highest profit per car in the industry. I was repulsed!
    Last edited by Jim Breazeale; 04-03-2024 at 03:04 PM.

  9. #59
    Hey Jim. For me it will always be Squallywood. Great skiing there.
    Steve Shea #1 joined a long time ago
    58 speedster
    66 912
    67S
    73S
    97 VW eurovan
    1132 honda snowblower

    member Jackson Hole Ski Club

  10. #60

    Ramble On

    From a company that nearly went away to making a profit. I like a success story. Doesn't mean I have to buy the product but I admire them for making a turn around. It means I can still get parts for my 911's.

    Back in the early 90s, Porsche hired Japanese engineers, mostly Toyota alumni, to improve efficiency in their manufacturing process, which eventually bring Porsche out of the brink of bankruptcy.


    https://blog.grabcad.com/blog/2018/1...manufacturing/
    Lean Manufacturing

    One of the keys to Porsche’s current profitability comes from the effective use of Lean Manufacturing principles. I’ve written about this manufacturing approach before, so it’s not necessary to launch into details about it here. Most people think it’s all based on Japanese principles.

    While Toyota certainly fused key cultural characteristics into its practice of Lean Manufacturing, the concept wasn’t created by the automaker. It was American business professor W. Edwards Deming who really created this innovative way of making things. The fact it translated well from American to Japanese culture was a testament to its universal effectiveness.

    When Porsche found itself in a deep financial hole, Lean Manufacturing was the escape rope. It’s detailed out in quite the story from The New York Times, called “Putting Porsche in the Pink.” To give you the short of it, Porsche’s production floor was a mess.

    Workers would need to climb ladders to get parts for the production line, causing holdups. Nothing was really organized. It was a model of inefficiency. Any outsider could immediately see why Porsche was losing money and sinking fast.

    In a desperate bid to become profitable again, Porsche hired several Japanese engineers from the Shin-Gijutsu group. Many of them had worked for Toyota before. Today, theses kinds of moves are pretty common. But back then, Porsche was a symbol of German national pride, so having foreigners come in and run things was…awkward.

    Of course, the alternative would have been bankruptcy. Supposedly BMW and Mercedes were waiting to pluck Porsche up for a steal. German automakers had tried adopting Just in Time Manufacturing techniques in the past, but tradition and culture stood in the way. It was pure desperation that brought everyone to their knees in Porsche, and it actually worked.

    Before the new manufacturing approach was instituted, it took about 120 hours to assemble the average Porsche. With the changes, that time was reduced to just 72 hours, or a 60 percent boost in efficiency. You’d think maybe workers were slopping through the cars, but they weren’t. The number of errors for vehicles had fallen 50 percent. The proof was in the results.

    First Experiment

    You could say the Boxster was the experimental Porsche. It was a huge departure from the 911 and the slew of front-engine models. Some decried it as a Saab imposter, thanks to the turbocharged four-cylinder engine. The idea was to attract younger buyers who might have skipped over Porsche before. It was affordable, sleek, and actually linked in principle to the Porsche 550 Spyder from way back.

    The Boxster was a pioneer in another key area: it was the first Porsche to be made using Just in Time Manufacturing. As noted before, it worked beautifully. To save on manufacturing costs, Porsche used many of the same parts for the Boxster as it did for the 996. That didn’t make enthusiasts happy, because they thought the move really watered down the 911 (no pun intended).

    Porsche purists have a history of complaining about any changes. For example, when the Cayenne was released, they howled and moaned about it. The SUV has funded the creation of a continuously-expanding array of 911 models, but that apparently isn’t good enough.

    From Bosses to Consultants

    When the team from the Shin-Gijutsu group was first hired, they walked the Porsche production floor day after day. The Japanese engineers would scold German workers and foreman, explaining to them in no uncertain terms that they had to change processes fundamentally. As described by The New York Times, it wasn’t a pretty sight, but it was necessary.

    After Porsche got back on its feet and enjoyed consistent profitability, things changed. The factory workers perceived the value of Just in Time Manufacturing. Likely grateful to not be looking for a new job, they didn’t resist the foreign methods like before. As for the Japanese engineers, they melted into the background, acting as consultants instead of task masters. They would show up quarterly to scold workers and management.

    Porsche Today

    While stern Japanese engineers no longer walk the Porsche assembly lines, their influence is still felt. The German automaker has been singled out quite a few times for making reliable vehicles and using highly efficient manufacturing processes.

    For example, in 2011 Porsche was recognized by the Manufacturing Leadership Awards. It has set up a consulting firm to help other companies streamline manufacturing, with a long list of clients. You could say Porsche is a model student of Toyota, which was a student of W. Edwards Deming.
    Early S Registry #235
    rgruppe #111

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.