(when did i miss the 2nd coming of the inquisition?)Originally Posted by creator8
info needed? needed for what? to condemn him? to make fun? to say, 'it's not a REAL rgruppe car?' LOL, what makes a real rgruppe car? blueberry jelly bean flavor'd blue colored car w/ shaved gutters? c'mon...
i think it's clear from the pics that the car is a work in progress....not finished. which by definition ends up being a project car for someone to finish... are we gonna be the english language syntax police now?Originally Posted by creator8
it's 'far from' *because* it's not finished. are there checklists to go by so that you know your car qualifies for the rgruppe criteria? (is there an rgruppe vin that's issued to make it 'authentic'?) is there a certain number of real vintage or nos parts that have to be installed on a car to meet that criteria? i don't know, but i haven't seen any checklists, and neither has this guy. if it's simply arbitrary, then say so. but if there are areas that need to be "pre-approved" then maybe they should be listed, no? so in his mind, he's on his way to building an rgruppe car. why would you say "it's not rgruppe" before it's even completed? again, is the nuance of the written english language enough to put down the car and its owner's intentions?Originally Posted by creator8
i don't think it's clear, and that's the whole point. this guy obviously doesn't think it's clear either. what are these reasons that you are pointing out? not enough nos parts? not 'vintage' enough? wrong wheels? paint not finished? what if he said he was planning on painting it 'mcqueen gray'? would that be enough? what if he says he's got 15x9 and 15x11 fuchs on order? would that be enough?Originally Posted by creator8
the point is, there is a vintage feel/side to an rgruppe car and then there is the balls-out perfomance side to the cars as well. many fall in between. maybe this is the one that's a 'tweener'. i just don't know how you can dismiss a claim just on looks alone.
a hot rod is a personal creation. since rgruppe was based on the hot rod (NOT concours nor 'authentic vintage') mentality, maybe the lines are blurred a little. too blurred for this guy to see them clearly. i'm sure if he was told that this and this needs to be present to qualify for the 'rgruppe label' he'd probably comply with them. the point is that to *this* guy the car is viewed as rgruppe-style. what's the point of pointing out that it isn't so? he thinks it, shouldn't that be enough?
what's the point of labelling a flawless early car replica a hot rod when sometimes all it really is a 'basic' car that used to sit on a dealership floor 30+ years ago? surely it's not a hot rod... but yet....
if you put out vague 'rules-n-regulations' out there, you're gonna have a lot of confused would-be members. either those things will be clear, and as long as you meet the criteria then it's an rgruppe car, or it's not. as it stands, who gets to say which nos parts make the car qualify?