Page 43 of 55 FirstFirst ... 33414243444553 ... LastLast
Results 421 to 430 of 544

Thread: Final thread on transition from 65-66 model yr!

  1. #421
    Early 911S Registry # 237 NeunElf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    San Dimas, CA
    Posts
    1,809
    I don't know whether or not I've posted somewhere in these 42 pages, but here's better information on my car:

    1965 Porsche 911 coupé
    Champagne Yellow # 6405
    Chassis # 301382
    Engine # P-901505 901.01
    Transmission # 101422 901/0

    It was originally delivered at Auto Rossel in Weisbaden on 21 June 1964. It was serviced at Vasek Polak's on "9.7.65" at which point it had 2144 miles.
    Jim Alton
    Torrance, CA
    Early 911S Registry # 237

    1965 Porsche 911 coupe
    1958 Porsche 356A cabriolet

  2. #422
    Senior Member Chris Pomares's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    2,090
    Does anyone know or can you make a educated guess as to the build date of 303434. Sept., Oct. 1965?
    Chris

  3. #423
    Quote Originally Posted by cmpski View Post
    Does anyone know or can you make a educated guess as to the build date of 303434. Sept., Oct. 1965?
    Chris
    Chris, 12. Jan 1966

    ~J~
    air cooled only

  4. #424
    Early 911S Registry # 237 NeunElf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    San Dimas, CA
    Posts
    1,809
    Quote Originally Posted by cmpski View Post
    Does anyone know or can you make a educated guess as to the build date of 303434. Sept., Oct. 1965?
    Chris
    Well, the little Technical Specifications booklet says the first chassis number in Calendar Year 1966 was 303391. It also says that Solex-carbureted 911 engine # 903360 was built on 8 December 1965 and engine 903910 (the last Soelex-carbed engine) was built on 21 February 1996. So, Porsche was building engines not faster than 7⅓ engines/day. The disparities between engine numbers and chassis numbers suggest there might be something like 0.8 cars built for each engine.

    303434 is 43 chassis numbers past the first car in calendar year 1966, so an educated guess puts 303434 in early January 1966.
    Jim Alton
    Torrance, CA
    Early 911S Registry # 237

    1965 Porsche 911 coupe
    1958 Porsche 356A cabriolet

  5. #425
    Senior Member Chris Pomares's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    2,090
    Thanks for the info.
    I must do more reading on this. I made a assumption that Porsche shut down in August and started the next year production in September. What actually happens after the August break and the end of the calendar year.
    Chris

  6. #426
    Early 911S Registry # 237 NeunElf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    San Dimas, CA
    Posts
    1,809
    Quote Originally Posted by cmpski View Post
    Thanks for the info.
    I must do more reading on this. I made a assumption that Porsche shut down in August and started the next year production in September. What actually happens after the August break and the end of the calendar year.
    Chris
    It seems it hasn't always been August. The little spec booklet that so conveniently lumps all the calendar year 1965 chassis numbers together says the '65 model year ran to June 1965 and the '66 model year started in July 1965. I've also read that the "Model 50" which was the first year of 356 production in Stuttgart ran from mid-March 1950 to mid-March 1951.
    Jim Alton
    Torrance, CA
    Early 911S Registry # 237

    1965 Porsche 911 coupe
    1958 Porsche 356A cabriolet

  7. #427
    Senior Member Chris Pomares's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    2,090
    Jules & NeunElf,
    Then my question is, if production started in June of 65 for the 66 cars and 303434 is the 43rd car for 66, did it really take tell Jan. 12th to produce the 43rd car? How long did it take to ramp up the assembly line and production? They didn't start building engines and cars tell December? What were they building? Parts? I thought they outsourced most parts.
    Chris

  8. #428
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Burford, ON, Canada
    Posts
    4,241
    I know there are now 43 pages, but if you had read through this thread then you would understand. Simply put, you are confusing calendar year with model year. I doubt that 303434 was the 43rd car for calendar year 1966 because they did complete them in VIN order. If they did indeed start 1966 model year production in July, the the VIN would be near 302000 +/-100. I know of one car near 301700 that has a 1966 paint code, but that seems to be a very special order.
    Porsche Historian, contact for Kardex & CoA-type Reports
    Addicted since 1975, ESR mbr# 2200 to 2024 03
    Researching Paint codes and Engine Build numbers

  9. #429
    Early 911S Registry # 237 NeunElf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    San Dimas, CA
    Posts
    1,809
    Quote Originally Posted by cmpski View Post
    Jules & NeunElf,
    Then my question is, if production started in June of 65 for the 66 cars and 303434 is the 43rd car for 66, did it really take tell Jan. 12th to produce the 43rd car? How long did it take to ramp up the assembly line and production? They didn't start building engines and cars tell December? What were they building? Parts? I thought they outsourced most parts.
    Chris
    Porsche does publish the chassis number range for calendar year 1966: 303391 to 307350. 303434 is 43 past 303391. Cars didn't necessarily get completed in exact chassis number sequence, but early January 1966 is likely.

    Here's the page from the spec booklet:

    Name:  booklet.jpg
Views: 545
Size:  128.0 KB

    Note that it separates chassis numbers by model years in calendar years 1966 and later but not in 1965. That has caused no end of confusion.

    The production totals are approximately:
    CY 1964 234
    CY 1965 3154
    MY 1966/MY 1966 1709
    MY 1967/CY 1966 2249
    CY 1966 3958

    As has been mentioned many times, they didn't get finished in exact chassis number order, so these figures may be a little off. They do show production slowly ramping up.
    Jim Alton
    Torrance, CA
    Early 911S Registry # 237

    1965 Porsche 911 coupe
    1958 Porsche 356A cabriolet

  10. #430
    Quote Originally Posted by NeunElf View Post
    Well, the little Technical Specifications booklet says the first chassis number in Calendar Year 1966 was 303391. It also says that Solex-carbureted 911 engine # 903360 was built on 8 December 1965 and engine 903910 (the last Soelex-carbed engine) was built on 21 February 1996. So, Porsche was building engines not faster than 7⅓ engines/day. The disparities between engine numbers and chassis numbers suggest there might be something like 0.8 cars built for each engine.
    There is a thread that the last engine used in a MY66 is actually like 40 numbers lower than 903910. Apparently they made some spares.

    Richard
    searching for engine (case) 903742

Similar Threads

  1. 65/66 final transition #2
    By Zithlord in forum General Info
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 01-22-2022, 11:50 AM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-01-2013, 03:11 PM
  3. Case Transition 4R/5R to 7R
    By Guru in forum General Info
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-05-2008, 06:44 AM
  4. TB 15 Tread Pattern Inspired Watch Band
    By JCR in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-03-2008, 09:07 AM
  5. 4R/5R to 7R transition
    By Zithlord in forum General Info
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-11-2007, 05:43 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.