Page 9 of 10 FirstFirst ... 78910 LastLast
Results 81 to 90 of 93

Thread: Anyone ever heard of a '72 model like this before ?...

  1. #81
    Senior Member 911T1971's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    3,008
    Quote Originally Posted by davep View Post
    A recent "discovery" of another "no-oil-flap" 1972. 9112300011 911S with engine 6320021.
    Also built in March 1971, and another special color: viper green
    I have asked for more info.
    http://atspeedmotors.com/1972-porsche-911s-prototype
    I just noticed, both cars are the first of the series, and both have engine serial #'s ending in 0021. We know the first 10 VIN's were reserved; could it be that the first 20 engine serial #'s were also reserved?
    If that car was ever in Switzerland, could be another Siffert car or then one of Pedro Rodriguez's 911.
    I know its a pretty loooooong shot (and the car seems heading straight to the US).
    Unique car.

    As Milou reported earlier in this thread, his now sold ex Siffert 71S april 71 built also had an 2.4lS engine (proto Sportomatic) w 71 (beige) interior, 71 specs, metalllic green exterior and NO oil flap, chassis No 1180.
    Last edited by 911T1971; 07-15-2014 at 10:59 AM.
    Registry member No.773

  2. #82
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Burford, ON, Canada
    Posts
    4,241
    Quote Originally Posted by 911T1971 View Post
    If that car was ever in Switzerland, could be another Siffert car or then one of Pedro Rodriguez's 911.
    I know its a pretty loooooong shot (and the car seems heading straight to the US).
    Note the North American DOT decal. From the seller spiel:
    This car is said to be the 1972 U.S. Emissions Testing car for the new 2.4L engine. It carries matching 2.4L engine #6320021. After testing, it was then given to the Holbert's by Porsche factory for their race team. As a race team owner, I understand what probably happened next...they were running low on money, so they SOLD THE CAR (something I'm sure was never "supposed" to happen).
    Porsche Historian, contact for Kardex & CoA-type Reports
    Addicted since 1975, ESR mbr# 2200 to 2024 03
    Researching Paint codes and Engine Build numbers

  3. #83
    It should also be a 911/53 case to be. A 2.4 or at least mine is I have 0020 and believe it is August/71

  4. #84
    Early S Reg #1395 LongRanger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    California High Desert
    Posts
    14,364

    9111301184

    Quote Originally Posted by 911T1971 View Post
    . . . If that car was ever in Switzerland, could be . . . one of Pedro Rodriguez's 911.
    I know its a pretty loooooong shot (and the car seems heading straight to the US) . .
    .
    One Pedro Rodriguez car has been ID'd . . . VIN = 9111301184 --- see post #5 . . .
    http://www.early911sregistry.org/for...ighlight=pedro

    This vehicle was completed/presented in late April '71. Rodriguez was killed racing in July
    Attached Images Attached Images  

    .........

    We Can Be Heroes

  5. #85
    Interesting story, they must have been testing the 2.4 engine for state side use with carburetors and MFI to see how they would comply with EPA standards. I say this because I was stationed in Wiesbaden Germany and ordered a 1972 911T in June 1971. When the order was placed my first invoice indicated carburetors. Late July I was contacted by the salesman and asked to come talk to him. He said I have good news and bad news, good news was all US models would be fitted with the MFI and the bad news was it would increase the price by (I think) $278.00 I was happy to pay the difference because I was essentially getting an E model but not paying the E price.
    So Porsche dealers (and possibly the factory) did not know till the end of July 1971 that all US models would be equipped with MFI.
    My 72 T was #153 off the assembly line and I picked it up around the first week of September at the factory.
    I now own a 1972 911S Targa

  6. #86
    Senior Member Peanut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    2,086
    I don't mean to hijack this thread, but the sellers text was interesting to me. I've never read such definitive language re the first 10-20 cars "would generally never be sold to public".

    Is this correct? As the owner of 68S #002, I'm trying to piece together early history.

    And re the 72S mentioned here, the ask is $525,000

    Quote Originally Posted by mmeldrum21 View Post
    From the At Speed Motors website;

    This Porsche 911S is absolutely extraordinary!!! Built in March of 1971 as a 1972 model, this car is THE LOWEST 1972 CHASSIS NUMBER KNOWN TO EXIST! Its VIN #9112300011 places it as a unit that would generally never be sold to the public! Usually, the first 10-20 cars were used for crash testing, in-house performance testing, emissions testing, etc. Then, those cars were usually either destroyed by the factory or used for something else internally.

    This car is said to be the 1972 U.S. Emissions Testing car for the new 2.4L engine. It carries matching 2.4L engine #6320021. After testing, it was then given to the Holbert's by Porsche factory for their race team. As a race team owner, I understand what probably happened next...they were running low on money, so they SOLD THE CAR (something I'm sure was never "supposed" to happen).

    Wait...it gets better! From the 1971 to 1972 model year, Porsche made a number of changes including moving from the 901 gearbox to the much improved 915 gearbox. This car has 915 gearbox #0001 and the gearbox itself is still in the pre-production magnesium casting!!! In addition, from the factory, this 915 gearbox came with an internal oil pump...THE ONLY 1972 S IN THE WORLD KNOWN TO HAVE SUCH FROM THE FACTORY and obviously the beginning of Porsche’s experimentation/testing for use in the upcoming 73 Carrera RS!!

    Other amazing prototype features of this S are: 1971-style factory through-the-body front oil cooler lines that were not put into production due to the costs associated with doing so - instead, in 1972, the factory starting running those lines outside the body along the right side of the car; 1971 911 oil fill tube with a 1971 sump tank; a single front battery from the factory; paint to sample by the factory making this THE VERY FIRST VIPER GREEN CAR IN EXISTENCE (by the way, quite a bit of the paint is ORIGINAL ON THIS CAR!); and NO EXTERNAL OIL FILL FLAP ON THE RIGHT SIDE QUARTER PANEL, from the factory; and ALL ORIGINAL 1971 interior - not 1972!!

    This is a true piece of Porsche history and I must publically thank Dr. Konradsheim for all of his assistance in researching the various details of this Porsche.
    1968 911S
    1986 Carrera
    2006 Carrera S

    1973 BMW 3.0CS - Frances (gone but not forgotten)

  7. #87
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Burford, ON, Canada
    Posts
    4,241
    Quote Originally Posted by Peanut View Post
    re the first 10-20 cars "would generally never be sold to public".
    Not quite correct. From the beginning of 1970 model year the first 10 VIN's of a model were reserved for specials. In many cases these were renumbered cars of previous years; mostly racing cars that were recycled. However, prior to that the 0001 cars were for public sale. In fact a lot of prototypes were also sold, some renumbered and some were not; the 3100xx car and several of the 3200xx cars are known.
    Porsche Historian, contact for Kardex & CoA-type Reports
    Addicted since 1975, ESR mbr# 2200 to 2024 03
    Researching Paint codes and Engine Build numbers

  8. #88
    Senior Member Per Schroeder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Avon Lake, Ohio
    Posts
    272
    About 10 years ago, I had the 8th 69E. Kinda neat--but was just a basic euro-spec car that a serviceman brought back.
    Per Schroeder

  9. #89
    Senior Member Peanut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    2,086
    Dave / Per - Thanks for the clarification.

    Scott
    1968 911S
    1986 Carrera
    2006 Carrera S

    1973 BMW 3.0CS - Frances (gone but not forgotten)

  10. #90
    A friend of mine owns #11 79 930, he was provided with a letter from Porsche stating the first 10 were crash tested and his would of been the first US 79 930. Don't know when this started.
    Phil
    Early S Junkie # 658

Similar Threads

  1. Have you ever heard of...?
    By Mr9146 in forum General Info
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-17-2020, 07:30 AM
  2. anyone heard from kundensport?
    By advtracing in forum General Info
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-22-2011, 05:10 PM
  3. Has anyone heard from Allan Heywood?
    By popowitz in forum General Info
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-28-2010, 05:56 AM
  4. Anyone heard of these guys?
    By 72911E in forum General Info
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-21-2007, 06:13 AM
  5. Anyone heard of Ravelco?
    By karlusmagnus in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-23-2007, 08:51 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.