Page 3 of 11 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 102

Thread: New Forum...

  1. 12-05-2007, 11:57 AM #21
    boxster03
    boxster03 is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    2,969
    Chuck

    Pls bring some ideas to the table for your meeting.

    Suggestion:
    1) put the section at the top in the tool bar with user cp/faq/member list etc.
    2) scan pictures from known references by model yr. by section
    3) contact members that have concours cars to take detailed photos for reference and scan and order by section (like silver 750 mile 70S)
    4) include concours judging guidelines where detail is provided as standard by section
    5) include a search option in ea section and cross to general search

    You might need to spend some of the dues $'s to make this happen.
    Early 911S Registry #750
    1970 911E - The Good Stuff
    2001 Toyota Landcruiser
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 12-05-2007, 12:08 PM #22
    Bobs 67S
    Bobs 67S is offline
    Senior Member Bobs 67S's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    1,352

    As Porsche did it/ FOB Stuttgard

    Yes please do it.

    I'll even rephotograph, in color, some of a car that first appeared in Dr. Brett Johnson's book 19 years ago.

    I've been looking for correct examples of 1967S and have been using Paul Risinger's as a perfect example. Some photos of his car are here on the S Registry and should be incorporated into everything that is right about the 67.

    Going back to the thread on the 1971-72-73 horns, location, colors and mounting was invaluable.

    This is a real good idea. Kenik...you in on this?
    Bob
    Early S Reg #370
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 12-05-2007, 12:43 PM #23
    Bert
    Bert is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    1,486
    Great idea and I like Chuck's title.

    The more the photos the better.

    Is it possible to flag older posts and move them to this new forum for easy reference?
    Bert Jayasekera
    1970 911T - Tangerine Orange
    Early 911S Registry #494
    R Gruppe #167
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 12-05-2007, 12:53 PM #24
    kenikh
    kenikh is offline
    Small Bore Whore kenikh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    5,046
    Always willing to help!
    Kenik
    - 1969 911S
    - 1965/66 911
    - S Reg #760
    - RGruppe #389
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 12-05-2007, 12:56 PM #25
    Bert
    Bert is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    1,486
    Great idea and I like Chuck's title.

    The more the photos the better.

    Is it possible to flag older posts and move them to this new forum for easy reference?
    Bert Jayasekera
    1970 911T - Tangerine Orange
    Early 911S Registry #494
    R Gruppe #167
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 12-05-2007, 01:28 PM #26
    ErichW
    ErichW is offline
    Senior Member ErichW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    469
    This is a great Idea. Go for it.

    Erich
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 12-05-2007, 01:46 PM #27
    Allen Henderson
    Allen Henderson is offline
    Senior Member Allen Henderson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    3,343

    I echo all the

    positive comments. We will need a vetting process though

    -Allen-
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 12-05-2007, 03:37 PM #28
    Jens
    Jens is offline
    Time Bandit Jens's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    vahmont
    Posts
    4,160

    Thumbs up

    Great idea Chuck. I'm really looking forward to this. This could be the makings of the definitive archive. I was thinking that there could be a discussionary section and an "accepted spec" section subject to editing.

    It's going to be interesting to see just how the hand built factory cars varied from what is supposed to be correct. "Fresh from the Factory" often didn't match the factory spec for model, type, and year. It got down right haphazard sometimes. Let's "include incorrect anomallies that are factory correct".

    Zitronengelb R1012 the RatBasterd
    RGruppe #183
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 12-05-2007, 04:24 PM #29
    72targa
    72targa is offline
    Senior Member 72targa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    13,233
    More great evolution of a growing board...
    Peter Kane

    '72 911S Targa
    Message Board Co-Moderator - Early 911S Registry #100
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 12-05-2007, 04:25 PM #30
    berettafan
    berettafan is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    1,075
    It would be a crime not to have such a forum given all the expertise that is available here.

    LOVE the photo documentation idea (various parts of cars).

    All posts should be subject to verification to avoid potential errors. i would think this forum would be the world standard on these cars.
    Erik

    Early S # 1107

    All my german equipment is either busted or sold...sigh....in the market for a decent non-sunroof tub!!!!!!! Help me get back to autocrossing!!!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Similar Threads

  1. Other car and vehicle forum......
    By Chuck Miller in forum Other Car Cultures
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 10-11-2022, 02:55 PM
  2. Relatively new to the forum
    By Sundevil64 in forum General Info
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-30-2013, 06:34 AM
  3. New regional forum
    By Andy B in forum Australia
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-30-2011, 01:07 AM
  4. RG Forum Problem
    By CurtEgerer in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 06-08-2010, 05:07 PM
  5. R Gruppe Forum
    By CurtEgerer in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 56
    Last Post: 11-05-2009, 04:58 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules


Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.