Page 3 of 14 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 131

Thread: 1969 Competition 911

  1. #21
    Quote Originally Posted by varunan123
    here we go

    1969 24 hr Le Mans entry list

    number 73-Porsche 911- by porsche factory-GT 2 .0-not accepted

    number 74-Porsche 911-by porsche factory-GT 2.0-not accepted

    now if we can only find a picture of these two cars.

    raj
    I wonder why they were not accepted?
    1971 911S, 2.7RS spec MFI engine, suspension mods, lightened
    Early 911S Registry Member #425

  2. #22
    Senior Member CurtEgerer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Sunshine State
    Posts
    5,780
    I suppose that maybe they had not yet homologated the LWB cars and had to modify the 68's. I think I may have fotos of those cars .... somewhere.

  3. #23
    Just a guess, Maybe they were Rs and since not a regular production car they were not allowed to run?

    Don

  4. #24
    The 69' Monte cars are LWB 1969 cars. Waldegard did win the Swedish Rally in 69' in a 911L (SWB) The other rally winners from that year are; Acropilis Rally - Toivonen 911S(LWB)
    Polish Rally - Zasada 911S(LWB sister car to Monte Winner)
    Tour de France - Larrousse 911R
    Tour de Corse - Larrousse 911R

    Im pretty sure the 69 Lemans cars were all SWB (TR's etc).

    Other than the 69' Monte winner I found another LWB factory race winner.....Porsche entered 3, lightened, fuel injected 911E's with Boge Self-levelling suspension for the Marathon de la Route. I have this info from a book, the year isnt stated, it would have to be 69' (the first year of the E), unless the factory wanted to test the suspension and injection in 68', like they did with the Sporto R, earlier? Anyway, they finished 1,2. Where are these cars now?

    Very interesting.....
    Matt Hart
    matthartcreative@instagram
    RHD 914
    1980 911SC (sold)
    69' T (sold)
    Early 911s reg # 994

  5. #25
    More info;
    Car 31 (S-L 2264) is being rallied in the 69' Monte. I have a feeling it is the Larrousse car that came second to Waldegaard (car 37, S-L 2263). Toivonen ran car S-L 2266.

    Its interesting to note that the Polish winning car of Zasada was also reg - S-L 2264, now car 100.

    The 69' Acropilis winning car of Toivonen was S-M 2929, car no 1.

    Now Im going to have to search through all of Curt's pics to find more of these cars .
    Matt Hart
    matthartcreative@instagram
    RHD 914
    1980 911SC (sold)
    69' T (sold)
    Early 911s reg # 994

  6. #26
    Senior Member HughH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Posts
    2,688

    le mans 1969

    here a some of my Le Mans pics from 1969.
    the first is car 63 from the le mans Test
    63 Jean Mesange / F Marcel Martin Porsche 911T
    the rest are from the race
    Attached Images Attached Images      
    Hugh Hodges
    73 911E
    Melbourne Australia

    Foundation Member #005
    Australian TYP901 Register Inc.

    Early S Registry #776

  7. #27
    Senior Member HughH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Posts
    2,688
    and the rest of them............................
    Attached Images Attached Images      
    Hugh Hodges
    73 911E
    Melbourne Australia

    Foundation Member #005
    Australian TYP901 Register Inc.

    Early S Registry #776

  8. #28
    Senior Member HughH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Posts
    2,688
    there were also quite a number of 911's at the 1969 Targa, some called T's at least one "S" and "R" etc
    this one is interesting as it is on "ZOLL" ( export) plates meaning it is probably brand new at the time.
    it is shown as a Porsche 911T in the GT2.0 class BUT was disqualified for "Illegal valve" the entrants were Ennio Bonomelli / Cesare Guzzi. Bonomelli was a serious Italian Porsche racer at the time (up to and past 73 and 74 RSR's) and i believe was known to modify the cars a bit - HE may have put bigger valves in it OR it may have ben a new 69 not yet thru homologation???

    any ideas?

    I have a number of other photos of the 911's at the targa in 1969 but none of them are good enough, or from the right angle to see if they were SWB or not
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Hugh Hodges
    73 911E
    Melbourne Australia

    Foundation Member #005
    Australian TYP901 Register Inc.

    Early S Registry #776

  9. #29
    I'm probably totally not up to speed on this but I noticed pretty much all the LeMans cars had no outside driver's mirror. What was the thinking behind that one? Aerodynamics??? Doesn't seem like a very intelligent thing to be doing in a race of that calibre and I'm surprised that wasn't a safety requirement of the times.
    Paul Schooley
    71 911T (RS wanabe w/2.7L juice)
    S Reg #863
    R Gruppe #330

  10. #30
    What book are these photos from?
    1971 911S, 2.7RS spec MFI engine, suspension mods, lightened
    Early 911S Registry Member #425

Similar Threads

  1. SWB Competition Set-up Help
    By Fishcop in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-12-2014, 03:38 PM
  2. Rivard Competition
    By ROONE in forum General Info
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-29-2014, 08:35 AM
  3. competition motor
    By fg1227 in forum General Info
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 02-13-2007, 12:10 AM
  4. Sam has competition
    By pwd72s in forum General Info
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-20-2005, 11:42 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.