Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 31

Thread: Short stroke options

  1. #1

    Short stroke options

    Hi all, i need some advice on what piston and cylinder sets are suitable and available for building a short stroke motor on a 2.4S case retaining the small spigots. Also which rods to use with a 66mm crank, S or normal, 2.0 or 2.2.

    Thanks Dave.

  2. #2
    What sanctioning body? That is the absolute threshold question as winning race engines are built to the limit of the rule book.

    2,4S would be a 5R case, you may want to consider a 7R as they are stronger. Figure about $1000 of machine work to any magnesium case to make it suitable for a short stroke. Personally I would much rather use a later 7R than cut the spigots on a magnesium 2,4S (diminishes its value and not as strong)

    What P&C? Well. . .

    Mahle Nikasil (RS type, low compression)
    LN Engineering "Nickies"
    JB Racing Aluminum Fin with Iron Sleeve
    QSC Chinese-Made
    Porsche Biral 84mm with 1mm Overbore for 85mm.

    Pistons- either stock Mahle or JE, compression either 9,5 single plug or 10,3 dual plug.

    Rods- I would use 2,2 rods, they are stronger than 2,0, and the nitrided S rods are just expensive collectors items. Of course these rods are heavier. ARP rod bolts are a must.

    If you want custom rods like Pauter, you may also want to consider having the crank reground to take Chevy bearings- this entails regrinding the crank journals to 2" size for reduced resistance (down from about 2.25" stock) AND you get to use NASCAR bearings which are a hell of a lot better than the OEM bearings for the factory crank. This is BIG $$$.

    Anyway, assuming this is a street engine here is what I would do-

    Late 7R case with oil bypass mod, align bore, case-savers, cut for big oil pump
    964 Oil Pump
    89mm Mahle Nikasil Cylinders (will make 2,463CC with crank below)
    9,5 JE Pistons
    2,2 normal Rods with ARP bolts
    66mm crank
    2,7 Heads
    PMO 40 Carbs

    If you have an extra three thousand or so in the budget then I would twin plug and go 10,3 to 1. If your budget is higher, port the heads.

    Camshaft selection is a VERY involved topic-- if you use the lower compression Mahle RS pistons and cylinders, you want 911T cams, these close the intake port earlier for a higher dynamic compression ratio that makes up for the loss of compression. If you have higher static compression, then I would consider a modern grind like a Supercup lobe on 102 centers-- this is what I am using in my restored '66-- Solex duration with slightly higher lift and a modern lobe profile for quicker opening, 102 lobe center like the late 911E cam. Others have their favorite cams, this is a long topic.

    Good luck!
    1966 911 #304065 Irischgruen

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Las Cruces, New Mexico
    Posts
    686
    Check the # on the case, a 72-73 2.4S will be a 7R with small spigots.
    Early 911S member #166

    I have no problem with the theory that all men are created equal.
    But after that moment you are on your own and nobody owes you a damn thing.

  4. #4
    Senior Member BBausser's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Sutalle, Ga.
    Posts
    913
    I think John C gave good advice. I just went through a similar thought process with my 67N. Only thing I would add is that while your in there and spending the money you should go twin plugs. A crank fire system and head work should come in a tad below $3K. I went so far as to source and buy a new Mahle 90MM P&C's and some other parts, that I will be selling when I get organzed, before I decided to go with a 3.6 conversion. Good luck with your project.

    Bill
    Currently:
    67 3.6 Rocket "Silver"
    62 T6 Outlaw Coupe "ole Yellow"
    65 F100 Custom Cab Flairside Shortbed

    Gone but not forgotten in last 2 years:
    67S Concours King
    67 912 Vintage Racer
    68 912 Flipper
    83 911SC
    93 Mo30 968

    too many cars before that

    Early S Registry # 787
    R Gruppe # 551

    "its better to wear out then rust out"

  5. #5
    Bill..let me know when your ready to sell the Euro 90mm P&C...Thanks

  6. #6
    FYI, the biggest pistons you can get in the small spigot bore case is an 87.5mm piston, using Nickies only as the cylinders.
    Kenik
    - 1969 911S
    - 1965/66 911
    - S Reg #760
    - RGruppe #389

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by kenikh View Post
    FYI, the biggest pistons you can get in the small spigot bore case is an 87.5mm piston, using Nickies only as the cylinders.
    ^without cutting the case
    1966 911 #304065 Irischgruen

  8. #8
    Thanks for all the advice, the case is a 3R very early 2.4S.

  9. #9
    Why are NASCAR bearings better than Porsche factory stuff? Materials? Design?

    The under-grinding must be done carefully to keep the fillet radius between the bearing journals and the crank throw, otherwise stress risers and metal fatigue failures can occur.
    1971 911S, 2.7RS spec MFI engine, suspension mods, lightened
    Early 911S Registry Member #425

  10. #10
    "Rods- I would use 2,2 rods, they are stronger than 2,0, and the nitrided S rods are just expensive collectors items. Of course these rods are heavier. ARP rod bolts are a must."

    John, why would you not want to use nitrided rods in a performance engine?

    thanks!
    - Neil
    '67 911S (Ol' Ivory)
    '82 Hewlett Packard 34C
    Early 911S Registry # 512

Similar Threads

  1. Short or Long stroke
    By andrea70 in forum General Info
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 10-21-2009, 10:48 AM
  2. S/T 2.5 short stroke twin plugg
    By Zithlord in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 06-16-2009, 09:32 AM
  3. Short Stroke Rods and Correct Air Compressor for 73RS
    By byron in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-21-2008, 09:52 AM
  4. Specs of 1971/72 2.4L short stroke MFI racing motor?
    By kenikh in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-08-2005, 04:26 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.