Doesn't look like an SC to me.Originally Posted by Bermudez
Doesn't look like an SC to me.
-Marco
SReg. #778 OGrp: #8 RGrp: #---
TLG Auto: Website
Searching for engine #907495 and gearbox 902/1 #229687
If it had been he would be going even faster….Doesn't look like an SC to me.
Doubtful. The SC doesn't move under it's own power.
-Marco
SReg. #778 OGrp: #8 RGrp: #---
TLG Auto: Website
Searching for engine #907495 and gearbox 902/1 #229687
I used to have a roof rack for mine. That looks dangerous, or that bike must be really heavy.
David
'73 S Targa #0830 2.7 MFI rebuilt to RS specs
Fullerton kept missing the apex at Nine because of your favorite gripe with the RS America… I am sure that cost him big time…. He also said the car caught air at 6… Which in his words was "quite alarming". Sport seats with no harnesses didn't help ether….
When are you going to remember I have an "S" and not a "SC" Marco. HahaDoesn't look like an SC to me.
The Growler is a pretty quick handful. 143mph (rev limiter in 4th) right before the braking zone for turn 1. The wheel spin into a power slide over 6 is more interesting though.
Last edited by Evan Fullerton; 10-30-2014 at 08:07 PM.
1975 911S - not so stock and getting less so all the time.
What is the difference between an "S" and an "SC"?? Can we even talk about this here??
The short answer is a SC is a more reliable car then any S. Mid year for marketing purposes only S's or otherwise.
1975 911S - not so stock and getting less so all the time.
That's just ignorant youth talking, right there.
-Marco
SReg. #778 OGrp: #8 RGrp: #---
TLG Auto: Website
Searching for engine #907495 and gearbox 902/1 #229687
So what's the difference then...That's just ignorant youth talking, right there.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote