Page 1 of 9 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 84

Thread: Solex 40 PI carburetors - untangling a mystery

  1. #1

    Lightbulb Solex 40 PI carburetors - untangling a mystery

    Some of you will recall from my paint thread that after over 2 years of searching for a set of rebuildable Solex cores and nearly giving up, I finally found an acceptable set on Pelican. Again, thanks to John Cramer for his eagle eye. I'd have missed them without his pointer.

    The set I bought were taken off of a ’65 back in the ‘80s and put them on a shelf. The car was owned by Jim Kaufmann, proprietor of 356 Carburetor Rescue, one of the top 356 Solex carburetor restorers. When he sold the car in 1990, he pretty much forgot about them until this year, when he decided to disassemble, replate, rebuild and rebush them, then post them for sale on Pelican.
    Here they are:




    In my research while trying to procure a set of these carbs, I came across tons of interesting and often conflicting information on these carbs. The one thing everyone seems to agree on is this:

    • Very early on, it became apparent that the Solex carburetors were causing more problems than Porsche thought they were worth and switched to Webers.


    In all fairness, Webers are very nice carbs and as we all know, have worked very well on 911s for a very long time. That said, they are a compromise design for the 911:
    1. The spacing of the Solex bores is a straight shot into the 911 intakes. Weber bore spacing requires offset manifolds, which is less than ideal from an engineering perspective.
    2. Webers don’t have chokes.
    3. Webers have a tendency to go dry in hard cornering without (albeit simple) modification.

    Regardless of the advantages, for some reason, they just didn't perform well over time - the history and reasons are somewhat shrouded by the mists of time, but here is what I have been able to glean:
    • Solexes worked just fine, off the lot, when new.
    • At about the 4000 mile mark, they started to become cantankerous and difficult to tune.
    • Porsche decided in mid-1966 that the Solexes would be phased out and replaced by the Webers. Owners with Solex cars could return the car to their dealer for a gratis retrofit.
    • Most owners did and many owners go to keep their Solexes, too.


    This brings us to today and the question of why did Porsche dump them? Why did they fail so quickly? Why did Porsche choose to replace them instead of fix, if it was possible? As we know today, making these carburetors run well is not only possible, they run better than Webers with the right modifications. What the "right" modifications are is open to debate and changes dependent upon who you talk to. The list of culprits I have heard from several experts:
    • The axial relationship of the throttle shafts to the rocking motion of the motor, exacerbated by a poor busing throttle shaft bushing design caused the bushing to wear beyond spec in several thousand miles, leading to significant throttle shaft leaks.
    • The emulsion tubes in the carbs were wrong sized from the factory
    • Fuel overheating in the overflow system
    • Sinking floats
    • The small restrictor hole in the fuel supply union at each carb is too small at 1mm, which apparently guarantees fuel starvation when used in anger. There was a factory mod published late 1965 to drill them out to 1.2mm. For racing (long periods at full throttle / high revs) 1.3mm is a quoted minimum.
    • The Pierburg dual diaphragm, camshaft driven, mechanical fuel pump are finicky to adjust. If not set perfectly, they either starve the carbs for fuel or flood the fuel system (they can only handle ~3 psi). Some also think that this pump’s ability to deliver fuel at a consistent rate was diminished over time due to wear.

    So if these are the potential culprits, addressing them must result in a fix and this seems to be the case:

    Duel Motorsports in Holland rebuilds these for a European vintage FIA racing class and their fixe runs the gamut: They do away with the mechanical fuel pump, ream the carbs for 356 Solex jets, drill out and replace the emulsion tubes, alter the bores and butterflies and rebush/ o-ring the throttle shafts with modern hardware.

    Harry Bieker says that the above is fine for race cars, but to make Solexes work perfectly on a stock 911, only one modification is necessary: Rebushing and o-ringing the throttle shafts. Harry said that of the myriad sets he has rebuilt in several decades, only one set has ever come back for another rebuild and there have been no complaints of diminishing performance or tunability. He says that the mechanical fuel pump is adequate for a stock Solex car.

    Grady Clay also cataloged some good info in this thread on Pelican, some of which is integrated into my post:

    So where am I heading with all of this? The Solex carbs I just bought were completely gone through by a 356 Solex expert. It will be interesting to see which of these modifications, if any, he did. If none of them were done, I will try running them as-is, to test the “4000 mile wear” theory. If they are unaltered, it will be very interesting to see if and how they fail and this may be the last, best chance at uncovering the true mystery of the Solex failures in a Porsche 911.

    Stay tuned – I should have my new-to-me carbs in hand next week and know if this is going to be possible. Below you’ll find some of the cool and hard to find parts I have collected over the years, as well. As they are all NOS (some are beat up, but nonetheless NOS as they have never been used), they provide an interesting reference point in this endeavor, as well.

    EDIT: for reference, I have added an excerpt that shows all instructions on the installation, tuning and troubleshooting of Solex carbs.
    Kenik
    - 1969 911S
    - 1965/66 911
    - S Reg #760
    - RGruppe #389

  2. #2

    Reference: Solex 40 PI NOS Parts

    Here's my parts collection, which were the last lot that Gary Emory had left.

    Two NOS passenger side manifolds. You can see the remnants of the original manifold coating, which even while on a shelf for 45 years, have lost quite a bit of their luster. Manifold 1:




    Manifold 2:


    NOS crossover fuel pipe:





    Kenik
    - 1969 911S
    - 1965/66 911
    - S Reg #760
    - RGruppe #389

  3. #3

    Reference: Solex 40 PI NOS Parts continued...

    NOS rebuild kit:



    NOS overflow covers:


    NOS (2) Pierburg fuel pump diaphragms:




    I'm not totally sure what this is - looks fuel related:
    Kenik
    - 1969 911S
    - 1965/66 911
    - S Reg #760
    - RGruppe #389

  4. #4

    Solex 40 PI - Restored parts

    Rebuilt by Ed Fall at VintageWorks and well worth the $127...labor, parts and replating. GORGEOUS.



    Kenik
    - 1969 911S
    - 1965/66 911
    - S Reg #760
    - RGruppe #389

  5. #5

    Solex 40 PI - Other parts...

    Airbox and snorkel...snorkel is "NOS", but needs a LOT of love...
    Kenik
    - 1969 911S
    - 1965/66 911
    - S Reg #760
    - RGruppe #389

  6. #6
    Don't forget the extra pistons!
    1966 911 #304065 Irischgruen

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by 304065 View Post
    Don't forget the extra pistons!
    I'm not sure what you are referring to. Please elaborate and I will update my first post with any new details as they come to light.
    Kenik
    - 1969 911S
    - 1965/66 911
    - S Reg #760
    - RGruppe #389

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Wellington, New Zealand
    Posts
    108
    Kenik,
    I think Mr Cramer is warning you not to drive your car with these carbs on while it is running too lean. Please try to avoid a piston melt down! I would suggest a good wide band 02 sensor for tuning like the innovate, Just to be sure.
    The part that your not sure about i think is screwed to the back of the engine and directs the oil that accumulates in the bottom of the air box at the ground. (they weren't as eco friendly as they have to be now! ) I think you will find a little hose fitting on the underside of the main part of the airbox.
    Cheers,
    Reuben

  9. #9
    Excellent clarification, Reuben. It appears that I will have to bug Jeff Higgins for his LM1 now that he is done tuning his mongrel MFI beast.
    Thanks for the tip!
    Kenik
    - 1969 911S
    - 1965/66 911
    - S Reg #760
    - RGruppe #389

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Wellington, New Zealand
    Posts
    108
    No worries,
    Thank you for bringing all the solex rumors and stories into one post and trying to sort out the facts! I will be going through the process of rebuilding and tuning my solex's hopefully in the next year or so when my car is ready for the road again, so this thread is going to be a great resource.
    BTW you dont happen to have a spare of that throttle shaft damper thing do you? mine was missing when i went through all the boxes from the PO.

    Keep up the good work! your paint thread is amazing, (and probably pushing me towards painting my own).

    Reuben

Similar Threads

  1. FS: Excellent Set of Solex Carburetors
    By dporsche74 in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-31-2013, 07:06 AM
  2. FS: Solex PI carburetors for 65-66 911 cars
    By VintageExcellen in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-16-2013, 07:59 AM
  3. FS: Solex Split Shaft Carburetors
    By jaudette3 in forum For Sale/Wanted: Other Porsche Cars and Parts
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-11-2013, 10:03 AM
  4. Who to rebuild Solex carburetors?
    By YTNUKLR in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 11-27-2006, 06:56 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.