Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18

Thread: Bilstein Rear Shocks Help?

  1. #11
    Senior Member t6dpilot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Chicago area
    Posts
    2,279
    Thanks for the replies guys. I missed them all until I saw Flieger's response. OK, here is the deal... I ordered the Bilstein rear shocks for the 1971 911 as listed on the Pelican Parts website. They only give you one Bilstein choice and do not differentiate between sport or HD, so I assumed HD (only sport choice is for 72/73). I don't think these are gas pressurized as those come with a wrap to keep them from expanding, no? These did not.

    It is the 71 I am talking about with a 3/71 build date (if that makes any differenc). I also have not changed anything with respect to the rear suspension, so everything remains stock. The bushings are tight against the chassis and there does not seem to be any binding of the shock housing on the chassis either. They move "freely" and the noise is coming from the bottom of the top housing touching the bottom of the shock housing. I may be able to correct this issue by tightening down the top mount nut even further to the point that the wrench does not turn.

    I am still perplexed as to why the car sits so much higher. The T-bars are what spring the chassis and determine ride height, so why would a shock cause it to rise over an inch? I can see maybe a 1/4" or so, but over an inch???
    Scott H.
    1969 Coupe LtWt
    1973.5 911T

  2. #12
    Bushings take a bit of driving to settle to ride-height. Gas pressure is surprisingly high in the gas-pressurized dampers.
    1971 911S, 2.7RS spec MFI engine, suspension mods, lightened
    Early 911S Registry Member #425

  3. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Burford, ON, Canada
    Posts
    4,242
    Standard shocks (not pressurized) have a piston rod that moves in and out freely with a little resistance, and normally you store it fully collapsed. Pressurized shocks have a piston rod that is normally fully extended, and can only be collapsed with great effort. This means that it acts as a shock and as a spring. This effectively increases your spring rate considerably. This in turn requires you to adjust the ride height of the car.

    Does Bilstein even make non-pressurized shocks? For the past 35 years I thought Bilstein & gas-pressure shocks were synonymous.
    Porsche Historian, contact for Kardex & CoA-type Reports
    Addicted since 1975, ESR mbr# 2200 to 2024 03
    Researching Paint codes and Engine Build numbers

  4. #14

    Bilstein Rear Shocks Help?

    Did you install the sleeve that goes over the top mounting stud and thru the rubber bushings?
    Early S Registry member #90
    R Gruppe member #138
    Fort Worth Tx.

  5. #15
    Are you referring to the dust cover? That would be an easy fix- just using a rubber bellows type.
    1971 911S, 2.7RS spec MFI engine, suspension mods, lightened
    Early 911S Registry Member #425

  6. #16
    Senior Member t6dpilot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Chicago area
    Posts
    2,279
    Dave, I recently spoke with an early 911 expert and he set me straight on this whole issue. Dummy me - all Blisteins are gas pressurized. Shoulda listened to ya' first time around. He has installed both Bilstein and Koni and with the gas pressurized Bilsteins, he always has to re-index the ride height. Honestly, I am not really so keen on doing that in the back as I can see this becoming a huge "mayaswells" project. That said, I do not prefer it, but may tackle it just the same - we'll see since I had planned on replacing the spring plate bushings also.

    Ed, yes I did install both bushings correct and the sleeve.

    I am going to send my original Konis out for rebuild and probably just put those back in. If I would have done my due diligence in the first place, I would have found out about the ride height change with the Bilsteins and would probably not have purchased them. Thanks for all the help guys - this board is invaluable to us that like to tackle these projects by ourselves.
    Scott H.
    1969 Coupe LtWt
    1973.5 911T

  7. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Las Cruces, New Mexico
    Posts
    686
    Quote Originally Posted by t6dpilot View Post
    Dave, I recently spoke with an early 911 expert and he set me straight on this whole issue. Dummy me - all Blisteins are gas pressurized. Shoulda listened to ya' first time around. He has installed both Bilstein and Koni and with the gas pressurized Bilsteins, he always has to re-index the ride height.
    Did he happen to mention how many degree's on the re-index? It would be good file info, I guess if your's sat 1" higher after install it wouldn' be too difficult to figure out.
    Early 911S member #166

    I have no problem with the theory that all men are created equal.
    But after that moment you are on your own and nobody owes you a damn thing.

  8. #18

    Tools

    I have a nice magnetic angle gauge if anybody wants to "borrow" it. Also have the Trailing Arm Tool for the spring plate.


    Tom
    Early S Registry #235
    rgruppe #111

Similar Threads

  1. FS: Rear Bilstein Shocks
    By greenrubbermatt in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-03-2014, 03:52 PM
  2. WTB: Original Bilstein rear shocks from 1970s
    By rynoshark in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-10-2013, 06:35 AM
  3. FS: Bilstein HD Rear Shocks
    By Mr9146 in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-11-2012, 06:28 PM
  4. FS: Bilstein Rear Shocks - New in Box
    By gruen911 in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-14-2010, 04:08 AM
  5. FS brand NEW Bilstein rear shocks (Sport)
    By 911scfanatic in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-16-2009, 06:19 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.