Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: manifolds question

  1. #1
    1973 911 # 58 Francois Duval's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Montreal , Canada
    Posts
    534

    manifolds question

    Hi, I had my 911 T manifolds machined yesterday to the S specs of 36mm to match my engine`s output.

    now the finish inside the manifold is kind of rough,,,,,,,,, not as smooth as it was before the machining.... do this have an impact on performance
    will this create turbulence on the air being sucked into the engine ?

    any experts out there ? thanks

    Francois

  2. #2
    My understanding is that you want a rough finish on the intake side to keep the fuel air mixture in a bit of turbulence and prevent the fuel from creating droplets.

    AM

  3. #3
    Hi,

    In case it helps, when we machine throttle stacks or manifolds the finish is as original. For example here are some mag MFI stacks finished machining today. These were enlarged to 50mm top to 42mm bottom tapered bore, not an easy task.





    HTH

    Alan

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Cape Vincent, NY
    Posts
    116
    The rough finish is perfect. It "shreds" the air, creating turbulence that keeps the fuel atomized well. Smooth finish is good for the combustion chamber and exhaust port.

    That is some nice machining on those tapers! that must have been a PITA job!
    1968 911S 30K miles
    2006 Saturn Ion DD
    1988 Beretta GT
    1981 5-Ton Chevy stake-bed

    Air goes in and out, blood goes round and round, any variation of this is a bad thing.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Posts
    827
    Salut Francois,

    I also heard that rough finish is fine on the intake to get good air/fuel mixture, but the combustion chamber and exhaust should be polished.

    Who machined them for you in Quebec ? Does he do porting on heads ?

    Thanks

    Jean-David (Candiac)

  6. #6
    1973 911 # 58 Francois Duval's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Montreal , Canada
    Posts
    534

    manifolds

    Thanks for all your input guys, its really appreciated. I take it that
    I will keep the rough finish and it should be fine.

    The company who did the machining is called DC Usinage here in Joliette.
    Its a small business that does many different tasks I heard.
    They kept the shop open for me late at night to do my job, it took them about 1.5 hour to do it. real nice job.

    FRancois

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 05-06-2012, 02:36 PM
  2. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-04-2011, 08:10 AM
  3. WTB: 67S manifolds
    By ajwans in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 05-16-2008, 08:45 AM
  4. Factory "TALL" manifolds vs PMO manifolds
    By RPMClassic in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-26-2008, 09:14 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.