Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17

Thread: Thoughts on 901 gear selection

  1. #11
    Here's the calculator I have been using.
    Attached Files Attached Files
    Kenik
    - 1969 911S
    - 1965/66 911
    - S Reg #760
    - RGruppe #389

  2. #12
    Senior Member aporschaguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Great White North
    Posts
    364
    Quote Originally Posted by kenikh View Post
    Here's the calculator I have been using.
    Fantastic thank you.
    "He has all the virtues I dislike and none of the vices I admire."

    1971 911e
    1978 911sc Targa (Sold)
    1973 911 RSR (Clone)

  3. #13
    Senior Member Neunelfer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Sandy, Utah
    Posts
    1,511
    I've yet to experience my A, F, M, S, Za but I'll let you all know when I do.

    Idea is to have a decent final gear that will hit the highway but not take the motor too far off the cams in case of one of our steep UT grades pops in front of me.

    The Za ia a 914-6 final and the motor is a sand cast 2.5
    Eric - Sandy, Utah
    71 911
    914-6/GT
    914-6/ORV
    87 944 Spec 1
    Porsche Truck
    62 Beetle
    80 VW “Caddy” Pickup
    72 R75/5 Toaster Tank
    PMB Performance
    We'll Make Your Calipers New Again
    Love Us On Facebook

  4. #14
    If you don;t want to spend money acquiring and building a new gear set right now, the stock gears you have of AFMSX is pretty good for a 2.2S. I ran my 2.2S in my 911 for years with the stock '69 tranny gears of AFMSZ. These gears work very well for a 2.2S (on group drives many people were surprised on how fast that set up was). Yours is even better with the X 5th. I'd say use the gears you have right now and see what you think.

    Of course if you don't mind spending a bit more money and want a REALLY fun box for that motor, go with the AFKQX. My 2.2S is now in my 914-6 with an AFKQX box wityh LSD and it is a LOT of run.
    Brooke
    1969 911 ST w/ 2.8SS
    1973 911 RS tribute with 3.3 turbo
    1970 914-6 w/ 2.2S (sold)
    1972 BMW M2 (sold)
    R Gruppe #338
    S Reg # 855

  5. #15
    I like AMFSX on twisty canyon roads with my 2.7RS spec engine in my 911S. For a 2.2S, I think something a little shorter would be good to let the motor rev and power around the tight curves.
    1971 911S, 2.7RS spec MFI engine, suspension mods, lightened
    Early 911S Registry Member #425

  6. #16
    I've been running A F J O S for a few years in my 2.0L S. I love it except I've been planning to install an X fifth. You could come over and test it out, but I have the stock box in right now.

    I'd put what you have in the car (doesn't take long) and see if you like it. I suspect you will. The gears will be great for the twisties and street driving, but probably a little short for PIR.
    Tom F.

    '67 911S Slate Gray
    '70 911T 2.8 hotrod (in progress)
    '92 964

    #736

  7. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Burford, ON, Canada
    Posts
    4,240
    I like the look of a V fifth with A F J O or A F J Q
    Porsche Historian, contact for Kardex & CoA-type Reports
    Addicted since 1975, ESR mbr# 2200 to 2024 03
    Researching Paint codes and Engine Build numbers

Similar Threads

  1. S/T, RSR Tire Selection...
    By markivan in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: 04-23-2022, 07:48 AM
  2. Tire selection ???
    By tull in forum General Info
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 01-06-2011, 12:43 PM
  3. Selection of MFI pumps FS
    By lisa_spyder in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-16-2007, 05:56 PM
  4. 215/60-15 Tire Selection
    By RTincher in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-20-2006, 06:46 AM
  5. 205/55/15 tire selection
    By Shuie in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 07-25-2004, 01:48 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.