Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Gray 356 Black bumpers

  1. #1

    Gray 356 Black bumpers

    I thought this could be on a separate thread, John's daily posting of photos should be for his posting of car photos. ( I think his postings have been become a "first look" for most of us).

    His recent photo of the gray 356 with the blackout trim and black tube bumpers has garnered a wide disapproval of some trim items.

    I think (notice-this is my opinion) the owner deserves a "A" for the quality of the changes.
    But, a D- for one item.

    Proportion.

    It's much like a very good looking lady with one over sized feature...like her nose... all of the components may be good - but the relationship is not very pleasing to my eye.
    Yup, proportion is off.

    Here is a quick study with a minor adjustment to the height of the top bars.

    You may not like the finish/color but a slightly different size is presented for your opinions.

    Improvement? Makes it worse? No difference?
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Bob
    Early S Reg #370

  2. #2
    I'd say it is better but I would rather see no top bar, or else no bumpers at all.

    Max_911S_fahrer, on Flickr
    1971 911S, 2.7RS spec MFI engine, suspension mods, lightened
    Early 911S Registry Member #425

  3. #3
    Senior Member Homemade 911's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    China Lake - Third Rock From The Sun
    Posts
    941
    I agree with Max...the bumper top bars just don't work. a Single bar approach would be ok on that shape...better (to my eye, anyway) to have no bumpers at all for that cleaner, outlaw look.
    Just an opinion...

    Cheers
    R/Thom

  4. #4
    Oil Cooled Heart Bullethead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    South Florida
    Posts
    1,571
    Well, like any hotrod, outlaw looks are subjective. In this case it's not proportions so much as a few details that spoil the whole. I like the shaved nose and don't mind the Cal-Look treatment, but consistency could make it work. I agree with everyone that the bumpers are fussy; a single bar would fit the look better (still needs rubber gromments), and headlight/taillight screws should be black. And the chromies don't fit Cal-Look... shoe it with some wide-5 magnesium Empi or TS's to finish it off.

    Still, it's laser straight in a muted color, and the owner/builder did what he wanted. Which is all that matters.
    Russ

    ESR # 1537

    '62 356S Notchback Hotrod
    '67 S Das Geburtstagsgeschenk
    '68 T Targa Sporto
    '70 914/6 GT

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Sonoma, CA
    Posts
    376
    There are things about this car which make me uneasy. However I suspect that is one of the necessary qualifications for an outlaw. I'm equally uneasy about dissing somebody's car who's only "crime" is that he took it to EASY on the 3rd weekend of the month where it was photographed by JZG as an example of a car which had a lot of attention from its' owner.

    This gray is a super color. I think it's too light to be Slate Gray and too dark to be "Battleship" Gray (We had a Battleship Gray 911 SC and it was fantastic with the early color and later shape). I too applaud the owner's desire to have an unique automobile.

    johnt

Similar Threads

  1. Stone Gray Example?
    By John912 in forum General Info
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 11-29-2015, 09:14 AM
  2. WTB: Blue or gray travel kit for MFI 911
    By rynoshark in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-12-2013, 09:57 AM
  3. Fs:gray seals
    By 71-911T in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-09-2011, 01:17 PM
  4. New Zealand Gray 1965
    By Bobs 67S in forum General Info
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-22-2006, 10:18 PM
  5. 73 Rubber Bumpers vs 72 Chrome Bumpers
    By MAPC in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 02-09-2005, 11:05 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.