Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Results 41 to 43 of 43

Thread: 2.2E Mild Upgrade. Short stroke or long? Opinions Please!

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Vancouver, BC
    Keith, listen to Ed. He really knows his stuff. I've read a lot of his older posts and have taken a lot of what he said to heart.

    Marc C.

  2. #42
    912->911 conversion
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Calgary, Alberta, Canada
    Thanks Ed!

    And Marc - no fear - Ed's advice and tips here and in Panorama have been diligently heeded over the years

    Keith Adams
    Calgary, Alberta, Canada
    912 Registry | Early 911S Registry #906 | PCA member
    1969 Blutorange 912R - 912 to 911 conversion
    1969 Mercedes 280 SE Coupe - 6 cyl 5 speed

  3. #43
    Very interesting thread and the 2.7RS is a stunner. I’m currently having my second rebuild in a year on a stock #s matching 71T 2.2. The builder and I are likely going 2.2S Ps and Cs with Solex cams and replacing the zenith carbs with PMOs. Good times!
    James Hurst #1638
    R Gruppe #514
    911T rebuilt to 2.2S

Similar Threads

  1. Short stroke options
    By saintdave in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 11-15-2009, 06:28 AM
  2. Short or Long stroke
    By andrea70 in forum General Info
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 10-21-2009, 11:48 AM
  3. S/T 2.5 short stroke twin plugg
    By Zithlord in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 06-16-2009, 10:32 AM
  4. 2.2 T engine mild upgrade
    By zaza in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-10-2005, 03:50 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Message Board Disclaimer
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.