Page 13 of 23 FirstFirst ... 31112131415 ... LastLast
Results 121 to 130 of 230

Thread: Post your 914s, Whether Original or Modified (hot rods).

  1. #121
    Senior Member Neunelfer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Sandy, Utah
    Posts
    1,511
    Agree... It would have to be pretty serious for the rack to be the issue.

    Rick, let us know what type of struts you have.
    Eric - Sandy, Utah
    71 911
    914-6/GT
    914-6/ORV
    87 944 Spec 1
    Porsche Truck
    62 Beetle
    80 VW “Caddy” Pickup
    72 R75/5 Toaster Tank
    PMB Performance
    We'll Make Your Calipers New Again
    Love Us On Facebook

  2. #122
    Here's what my bought-back 914 looks like currently ... it's scheduled for pick-up soon and I should have it by the end of the month barring any unforseen obstacles.

    Still has the vintage 76 ball on the antenna, the lightweight hood badge, and "original" plates from when I first built it. I'm excited!!
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by Mr9146; 02-16-2013 at 12:05 PM. Reason: spelling
    -Marco
    SReg. #778 OGrp: #8 RGrp: #---
    TLG Auto: Website
    Searching for engine #907495 and gearbox 902/1 #229687

  3. #123
    While you said it was aligned, that twitchiness sounds like excessive rear toe out (the way you might set up an autocross car). Jon
    '61 356B Super 90 Cabriolet
    '67 911S Coupe
    '70 914/6 GT

  4. #124
    Senior Member t6dpilot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Chicago area
    Posts
    2,279
    That is really cool Marco. It looks great. What engine do you have slated for it?
    Scott H.
    1969 Coupe LtWt
    1973.5 911T

  5. #125
    Quote Originally Posted by t6dpilot View Post
    That is really cool Marco. It looks great. What engine do you have slated for it?
    Well, the 2.5L twin plug motor in my 911 was originally assembled for my previous 6, and the 911 is due for a restoration after this year's race season, so it's a good excuse to snatch out the motor and use it in the 914. That said, however, if I transplant the 2.5L I'm going to install MFI - the motor was built with MFI heads and cams, and the 914 was already set-up for an MFI motor so it'll be plug and play.

    I have no idea what I'll do to the 911 afterward, but the restoration will take a while so there's no rush to decide. We have enough parts laying around to build another carbureted 2.5L twin-plug, but I miss the big-bore stuff so I have been collecting parts for a 2.8, too. Who knows, maybe I'll just build the big motor and dump it into the 914...
    -Marco
    SReg. #778 OGrp: #8 RGrp: #---
    TLG Auto: Website
    Searching for engine #907495 and gearbox 902/1 #229687

  6. #126
    Quote Originally Posted by JKW View Post
    While you said it was aligned, that twitchiness sounds like excessive rear toe out (the way you might set up an autocross car). Jon
    Normally you would never use a toe out setting in the rear for auto-x. I run 1/16 toe in on the rear and about the same toe out up front for good turn in. I would re-check the alignment on this car.
    Last edited by Bobby Smith; 02-17-2013 at 05:12 AM.
    Bobby Smith
    member #299
    1973 914/4 2.8 ltr. (FTD winner 2008 Charlotte Parade) (sold)
    1973 911 "Orangello"
    1973 914/6 GT 3.2 "Crystal Blue Persuasion" (sold)
    2011 Boxster Spyder
    1973 911 E "E GO" Metallic Green

  7. #127
    Interesting , I wonder where he had it done , eastside ?? Fordahl ?? Trueline ?? Group 2? Les Schwab? He should have a sheet on the specs regardless..
    Jeff H.
    72 911
    914-6 GT

  8. #128
    Blessed be the lowered RickS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Worshington State
    Posts
    1,360
    The alignment was done by a reputable local Porsche shop which is highly experienced with 914s. They installed a complete Street/Track 1 Elephant suspension. The struts are Bilsteins all around and are 3 years old with about 2,000 miles on them. Everything though everything was set to factory specs, it felt twitchy. 2 degrees of toe in was place on the fronts to see if it would lesson the twitchyness to no avail.

    "nose dive into the corner?" Not in the least.

    "Is the steering rack have any issues?" None what so ever. All the components were checked with the new suspension install. All I know is that prior to the Elephant street/track 1, is did corner without the twitchiness. Thinking of disconnecting the front sway just to see if it makes any difference.
    Last edited by RickS; 02-18-2013 at 05:37 PM.
    71 914 3.0, 82 SC, ESR 376, RG 307

    "The problem with the world is, the ignorant are cock-sure and the intelligent are full of doubt." Bertram Russell

  9. #129
    Quote Originally Posted by RickS View Post
    The alignment was done by Bernie (European Autowerke) who is highly experienced and competent with 914s. He did the install on the Elephant suspension. The struts are Bilsteins all around and are 3 years old with about 2,000 miles on them. Everything was set to factory specs and that was when it felt so twitchy. We put 2 degrees of toe in on the fronts to see if it would lesson the twitchyness to no avail. Was thinking about taking it to either Fordahl or a specialty race shop on the eastside.

    "nose dive into the corner?" Not in the least.

    "Is the steering rack have any issues?" None what so ever. All the components were checked with the new suspension install. All I know is that prior to the Elephant street/track 1, is did corner without the twitchiness. Thinking of disconnecting the front sway just to see if it makes any difference.
    Sounds to me like the back is driving the front. Small steering inputs create the sensation the back wants to come swinging around really quickly, right? I doubt it's anything to do with the front bar as that would cause the car to push. I'd check the rear toe settings - sounds to me like there's too much toe out. I'd also look at your caster settings; I like my steering a bit heavy and set my car up with about 6* ... I believe the book calls for 5.
    -Marco
    SReg. #778 OGrp: #8 RGrp: #---
    TLG Auto: Website
    Searching for engine #907495 and gearbox 902/1 #229687

  10. #130
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr9146 View Post
    Sounds to me like the back is driving the front. Small steering inputs create the sensation the back wants to come swinging around really quickly, right? I doubt it's anything to do with the front bar as that would cause the car to push. I'd check the rear toe settings - sounds to me like there's too much toe out. I'd also look at your caster settings; I like my steering a bit heavy and set my car up with about 6* ... I believe the book calls for 5.
    I agree. I think 6 is about all you can get out of the caster setting on a stock 914 and too little caster would cause "twitchiness". I would dial in all the caster possible. I would also set the front and rear toe at 0 for a street car. 1-1 1/2 negative camber also works well on a street setup. That should get you right in the ballpark. If it stills feels odd, have others drive the car and see what they think.
    Bobby Smith
    member #299
    1973 914/4 2.8 ltr. (FTD winner 2008 Charlotte Parade) (sold)
    1973 911 "Orangello"
    1973 914/6 GT 3.2 "Crystal Blue Persuasion" (sold)
    2011 Boxster Spyder
    1973 911 E "E GO" Metallic Green

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-09-2013, 06:03 AM
  2. FS: Modified Original Leistritz Sport Muffler
    By YTNUKLR in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-08-2013, 09:13 PM
  3. Modified or O.E.?
    By Fritz A. Ficke in forum General Info
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 07-18-2011, 08:45 AM
  4. 4 post vs 2 post lift advice requested
    By caproader in forum General Info
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-20-2010, 10:56 AM
  5. Value of 1970 E that has been modified???
    By t6dpilot in forum General Info
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-13-2006, 10:47 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.