show me your all original cars

[LongRanger]

VIN = 9111200404
Eng# = 6210606
Trans# = (not available)

. . . as advertised on eBay . . .

http://www.early911sregistry.org/for...uot-have-a-71E

. . . 1971 Porsche 911E Coupe with 100% factory-original Conda Green paint. One documented owner, 48K original miles, 100% factory-original interior in superb condition. All numbers match per Porsche's Certificate of Authenticity (COA). No rust anywhere, never wrecked or even scratched. Every panel, every jam, and every spec of the undercarriage is 100% factory original. Registrations going back to 1971, a fully-documented one-owner car. Purchased new in California by a nuclear physicist who lived in the wine country surrounding Lawrence Livermore laboratory in the East San Francisco Bay Area. He and his wife (also a nuclear physicist) retired from physics and became vintners (I will include a case of their wine). They planned to upgrade their wine-making facilities and decided to sell their prized 911E, along with a 1956 Porsche 356A Speedster which we also purchased. This 911E is a true "survivor" Porsche in every since of the word. Everything is completely original, in and out. The door panels were never even taken off. When you look in the corners of this car is when you begin to appreciate its authenticity . . .

(Not mine)

[LongRanger]

. . . . . . . . .

[LongRanger]

. . . . . . . .

[JH0524]

The blue plate is not from 1971; should be a six character plate (3 numerals, 3 letters).

So, why was a newer plate issued? Out of state for more than a year? Went on 'unregistered' status and they did not retain the original plate? Would be interested to know the whole history.

[LongRanger]

. . . The blue plate is not from 1971 . . .

Also . . .

. . . Purchased new in California by a nuclear physicist who lived in the wine country surrounding Lawrence Livermore laboratory in the East San Francisco Bay Area . . .

. . . L.A.'s nowhere near Lawrence-Livermore . . .

[Jens]

Nothing says meticulously maintained original like freshly painted heat exchangers. And that original muffler doesn't even look like it's been farted through let alone driven for 48,000 thousand miles.

[Jens]

I'm sorry, there has obviously been some freshening up of things, and it sure does look like a nice car.

[LongRanger]

Seller advertised this as 'mostly original' paint, so . . .

. . . I'll just stick to these under-shots


VIN = 9111300152
Eng# = 6310232
Trans# = 7111091

http://www.early911sregistry.org/for...hlight=peaches

(Not mine)

[LongRanger]

. . . Canadian . . .

. . . a 1971T in fabulous, original condition with what seems like original 46,000miles on the clock. It was advertised here on the board for some time and I only realised which car it was when I contacted a friend in Canada who had sent me pictures of this time warp a couple of years earlier . . .

. . . It wasn't that expensive and came with some nice NOS parts to get the shockers and exhaust back into shape . . .

. . . The few people whio have seen it out here are quite amazed as none of us has seen too many cars in this original, unrestored condition given that its 35years old . . .

. . . I have started cleaning the 35 years of road gime off the underneath to find pristine original black paint virtually unmarked. Many hours and lots of brushes later this car could easily be concours material without hardly a dollar to spend . . .

http://www.early911sregistry.org/for...own-Under-quot

. . . . . . . . . . .

[Alex Webster]

My father's 1973 2.4E.

Delivered new to a doctor Tasmania (that small island at the bottom of mainland Australia).

We are the third owner and it has only travelled 28,000 miles from new.

Nice options including sunroof and single sports seat. Car is like new other than some minor paint stone chips etc.

We have owned it for about 8-10 years now. Just an amazing car to drive. Excuse the crappy mat on the drivers side!