Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 38

Thread: David Pipers 917

  1. #21
    nemo me impune lacessit Kris Clewell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Minneapolis
    Posts
    2,045
    its not quite the same, but I drove bobs early 65 911 after our shoot for total911. I was scared out of my mind, but was careful and really appreciated the opportunity.
    -Kris Clewell

    Professional photojournalist

    red decklid club member #1

  2. #22
    Senior Member BURN-BROS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Camarillo, Ca.
    Posts
    153
    There is too little information in the article to pass judgement on Mark Hales in my eyes. 8200 rpm is not a missed shift....it's not even an overrev.

    There is another article that states there was a gearbox issue that caused the "problem". I suspect the issue(s) are rooted in poor maintenance or a lack of maintenance.

    Piper charged 3500 to drive his car. He bears no apparent liability when a lack or maintenance could very well have caused both the reason for going to 8200 as well as the damage when Hales went past the "magic" 7000 rpm.
    Aaron Burnham
    Burnham Performance
    1071 Avenida Acaso ste D.
    Camarillo, Ca. 93012
    805-240-6931

    _________________________

  3. #23
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    505
    Here is a link to a statement from Hales legal team: http://www.trackdriver.com/Response%...0v%20Hales.pdf
    1970 911S
    1963 Abarth Monomille
    1974 2002 Turbo

  4. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    505
    And here is a link to a fund to raise the money Mark Hales owes Piper: http://www.indiegogo.com/fixthe917
    1970 911S
    1963 Abarth Monomille
    1974 2002 Turbo

  5. #25
    Early S Reg #1395 LongRanger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    California High Desert
    Posts
    14,379
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr9146 View Post
    . . . not going to change my position, but I do believe Chris Harris hit the nail on the head when he said that the driver should give what he can and the owner should absorb the rest . . .

    . . . Since that day I've never borrowed any vehicle at a racetrack, but I learned a valuable lesson . .
    .
    Hmm

    I think it'll be a while before I see any of Mr Piper's cars come out, again . . . at speed

    .........

    We Can Be Heroes

  6. #26
    Senior Member BURN-BROS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Camarillo, Ca.
    Posts
    153
    From the statement;

     The failure by Mr Piper to keep any maintenance records whatsoever. Not surprised

     Mr Piper’s reliance on an invoice dated the 30th February, in which the issuer
    misspelt his own name.

     Mr Piper’s reliance on cash payments which could not be substantiated.
    There was no proof of payment whatsoever for any of the bills. WOW, judgment awarded without invoices of work done? Is this accurate?
    Aaron Burnham
    Burnham Performance
    1071 Avenida Acaso ste D.
    Camarillo, Ca. 93012
    805-240-6931

    _________________________

  7. #27
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Northern VA
    Posts
    575
    This whole thing smells fishy. I think the journalist might want to look at his lawyer for not requiring evidence and testimony. He is also stupid for not carrying at least some insurance.

    On the other hand, Piper seems like some sort of high-end slip and fall guy - cash payments, no records, etc. wouldn't even cut it in small claims court. Now the journalist is sending out a plea for $:

    Where is the evidence on

    Maintenance records?

    Past history; including, every past driver, and their over rev history?

    The factory "life spanned" parts -- rods, everything else. How many parts were over their life span? He is likely liable for depreciated rates not replacement cost?

    According to the factory, the 917s were rated to 8,500 RPM, this grenaded less than.

    Piper entered into a commercial enterprise, which implies at least SOME risk and liability

    He then profited from its sale?

    This guy didn't break this car. Rather, it broke when he was driving it.

  8. #28
    Senior Member Macroni's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Philadelphia PA
    Posts
    3,231
    Interesting..... thanks Yale. I feel for Mr Hales. It is a shame but in my opinion it appears he should have sued Octane magazine to invoke their coverage (deep pockets).
    86 Sport Purpose Carrera "O4"

  9. #29
    My understanding: Hales was not hired by Octane. He was a freelancer and sold the story to many magazines.
    Renn-Spot - Cars & parts For Sale - http://renn-spot.blogspot.com/
    1970 911"S" - Black (originally silver)
    1974 911"S" - Silver
    1973 911"T" - Bahia Red - Now Sold
    10 sec 67 VW
    Early "S" Registry #439

  10. #30
    nemo me impune lacessit Kris Clewell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Minneapolis
    Posts
    2,045
    Quote Originally Posted by Cornpanzer View Post
    My understanding: Hales was not hired by Octane. He was a freelancer and sold the story to many magazines.

    likely true. not many staff mag folks now. its mainly contributors and freelancers. cheaper that way for the magazines.
    -Kris Clewell

    Professional photojournalist

    red decklid club member #1

Similar Threads

  1. David Pipers 917
    By yale in forum General Info
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 01-24-2013, 02:57 PM
  2. J. David 935
    By CurtEgerer in forum Other Porsche Passions
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-15-2012, 01:31 AM
  3. David Loop's new '73 project car...
    By LKreg in forum General Info
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-02-2012, 05:42 PM
  4. David E. Davis has Died . . . .
    By LongRanger in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-06-2011, 05:35 AM
  5. The David Copson (special Order) Car
    By boxster03 in forum General Info
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 04-14-2006, 05:28 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.