Page 50 of 275 FirstFirst ... 40484950515260100150 ... LastLast
Results 491 to 500 of 2742

Thread: 911S/911L Cars for Sale

  1. #491
    Quote Originally Posted by Richardnew View Post
    About a month ago everyone thought the Pano article was insane. Now those prices seem low. Keep in mind that over the past several years the Monterey prices have held. They became the going price for the year. We'll see if that happens again.

    Richard Newton
    Remember: a high tide floats all boats.
    -Marco
    SReg. #778 OGrp: #8 RGrp: #---
    TLG Auto: Website
    Searching for engine #907495 and gearbox 902/1 #229687

  2. #492
    Quote Originally Posted by Louie View Post
    WOW...thats almost $220...must of been a darn near perfect car. Thanks for posting Marco...

    Must've been this bullet that drove the sale...

    ■Offered with Porsche Certificate of Authenticity and Tools
    Peter Kane

    '72 911S Targa
    Message Board Co-Moderator - Early 911S Registry #100

  3. #493
    ............. Soterik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Seattle WA
    Posts
    3,516
    Hmmm.....

    Sold at $85,000
    http://www.mecum.com/auctions/lot_de...9&entryRow=543

    Sold at $95,000
    http://www.mecum.com/auctions/lot_de...3&entryRow=543

    Not sold at $32,000
    http://www.mecum.com/auctions/lot_de...9&entryRow=543

    Sold at $95,000
    http://www.mecum.com/auctions/lot_de...2&entryRow=543

    Sold at $91,000
    http://www.mecum.com/auctions/lot_de...7&entryRow=543

    Tide came in a bit here, sold at $85,000 (I passed on this car at $53,000 two months ago).
    http://www.mecum.com/auctions/lot_de...5&entryRow=543

    So, looks like a mixed bag to me based on Mecum imho. Note that a lot of the Porsche 356 numbers at Mecum weren't spectacular as well.

    In regards to the Pano article, the top end of the market has validated the top numbers for the S(private sales were already there), but the "good driver" numbers on the S (in general), and the T and E numbers appear to be unsupported from what I can see in the market.

    Any results from the other auctions to make the case of a high tide?

    e

  4. #494
    Senior Member curtisaa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Pasadena, CA
    Posts
    1,574
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr9146 View Post
    Remember: a high tide floats all boats.
    ...or something like that !
    [FONT="Lucida Sans Unicode"]
    Curt Autenrieth
    S Registry # 152

    Porsches:
    1.6L 2.7L
    1.8L 3.0L
    2.0L 3.2L
    2.2L 3.4L h20 cooled
    2.4L 3.6L air & h20 cooled
    3.8L

  5. #495
    Senior Member Peanut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    2,085
    Quote Originally Posted by Soterik View Post
    Hmmm.....

    Sold at $85,000
    http://www.mecum.com/auctions/lot_de...9&entryRow=543

    Sold at $95,000
    http://www.mecum.com/auctions/lot_de...3&entryRow=543

    Not sold at $32,000
    http://www.mecum.com/auctions/lot_de...9&entryRow=543

    Sold at $95,000
    http://www.mecum.com/auctions/lot_de...2&entryRow=543

    Sold at $91,000
    http://www.mecum.com/auctions/lot_de...7&entryRow=543

    Tide came in a bit here, sold at $85,000 (I passed on this car at $53,000 two months ago).
    http://www.mecum.com/auctions/lot_de...5&entryRow=543

    So, looks like a mixed bag to me based on Mecum imho. Note that a lot of the Porsche 356 numbers at Mecum weren't spectacular as well.

    In regards to the Pano article, the top end of the market has validated the top numbers for the S(private sales were already there), but the "good driver" numbers on the S (in general), and the T and E numbers appear to be unsupported from what I can see in the market.

    Any results from the other auctions to make the case of a high tide?

    e
    Unless a deal was worked with the auction company, doesn't the buyer pay an additional 10% above the selling price? IF that is the case, then the cheapest car was 93.5k. Doesn't that support the "driver numbers" listed in Pano? I leave it to the experts here, but I was curious to know this as I watched Mecum.

    Also - I saw that RM was listing a 1970 S that I had discussed with the seller about 1-2 months ago. It was somewhere around high $70s / close to $80k. Silver 1969 S. I don't see the results from their auction, but was curious if someone knew?
    1968 911S
    1986 Carrera
    2006 Carrera S

    1973 BMW 3.0CS - Frances (gone but not forgotten)

  6. #496
    Senior Member Peanut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    2,085
    Yeah - sorry I saw in another thread here on the registry that it was at Russo & Steele. My bad. I saw that the car I am thinking of sold for $55k. Ouch to the seller, as I believe he/she spent nearly $80k for the car pretty recently.

    http://www.russoandsteele.com/collec...sche-911/28021
    1968 911S
    1986 Carrera
    2006 Carrera S

    1973 BMW 3.0CS - Frances (gone but not forgotten)

  7. #497
    IMO, Mecum and Russo & Steele are not the best venues for collector quality European sports cars.

  8. #498
    Longhoods forever! silverc4s's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Somewhere in Texas
    Posts
    439
    So the early 911S is finally a six figure car? Looks that way from here.
    Bill Conway, Early S Registry member #254
    1970 S, 2.2L Silvermetallic Coupe
    1973 T, 3.2L Black Carrera Targa
    1969 T, 2.4L Silvermetallic Targa

  9. #499
    Early S Reg #1395 LongRanger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    California High Desert
    Posts
    14,304
    Quote Originally Posted by nickb4 View Post
    . . . That one was the '70S Euro Craigslist Idaho find discussed here:
    http://www.early911sregistry.org/for...ighlight=idaho
    Uhhhh . . . no

    The 'Idaho' car . . .

    http://www.early911sregistry.org/for...ighlight=idaho

    . . . VIN = 9110300151


    Russo & Steeles's car . . .

    http://www.russoandsteele.com/collec...sche-911/28021

    . . . VIN = 9110300343

    .........

    We Can Be Heroes

  10. #500
    Early S Reg #1395 LongRanger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    California High Desert
    Posts
    14,304
    Quote Originally Posted by geshaghi View Post
    . . . IMO, Mecum and Russo & Steele are not the best venues for collector quality European sports cars . . .
    Bingo

    Ask yourself . . . . 'where would/did I buy my car? . . .'

    .........

    We Can Be Heroes

Similar Threads

  1. 911T Cars for Sale
    By Soterik in forum For Sale/Wanted: Early 911 Cars, 1965 - 1973
    Replies: 2766
    Last Post: 03-13-2024, 10:43 PM
  2. Any good cars for sale?
    By Msnowdon in forum General Info
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 03-01-2015, 02:02 AM
  3. Cars for sale postings
    By SyarMotorsport in forum General Info
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-26-2007, 09:44 PM
  4. Cars for Sale on the Internet
    By CanuckRS in forum For Sale/Wanted: Early 911 Cars, 1965 - 1973
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-28-2007, 06:42 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.