Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Restoring a 'previously restored' car

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    3

    Restoring a 'previously restored' car

    In response to a question I posted on this thread>> http://www.early911sregistry.org/for...=1#post1009326

    Is it easier to restore an untouched car or to rectify the restoration already done by previous owner?? See the car in question in thread linked to above. Alot of work done but alot of that will probably need to be redone or reworked at least.

    Mechanically the engine and gearbox and brakes have been worked on and rebuilt with receipts to prove - is this alone not worth something even if you have to do a full body respray and refettle of metalwork, interrior etc??

  2. #2
    Serial old car rescuer Arne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Eugene, OR
    Posts
    1,959
    No question, stick with the unrestored, unmolested car. If the "restoration" work isn't good enough as is, redoing it is worse than going from scratch. Especially since you don't know what corners were cut to get where it is.
    - Arne
    Current - 2018 718 Cayman, Rhodium Silver, PDK

    Sold - 1972 911T coupe, Silver Metallic; 1984 911 Carrera coupe, Chiffon white; 1973 914 2.0, Saturn Yellow; 1984 944, Silver Metallic

  3. #3
    Early S Reg #1395 LongRanger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    California High Desert
    Posts
    14,361

    Restoreds vs Nots

    Dunno 'bout 'easier.' The number of variables, here, boggles

    FWiW . . .

    . . . I like the Nots because they at least give me a chance to see what the cars were really like --- before all the creativity/personalization/reproduction/name-your-nonsense starts



    Thinking about the Gmünd Coupe that Road Scholars restored + sold to Peter Porsche. The Guy they bought it from had stripped the paint . . .

    . . . with a band-sander, was it? . . .


    . . . had to re-panel the whole car, just-about





    Must be nice to have money




    .....

    .........

    We Can Be Heroes

  4. #4
    Senior Member moito's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    AUSTRIA (tu felix)
    Posts
    6,714
    restoring a "restored " car usually is a PITA

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Darien, CT
    Posts
    297
    All I have to say is "never again". Our 69S was "restored" if that is what you want to call it. Amazing what hides under a nice coat of paint. Don't think it went 50 miles in said "restored" condition before another complete strip to metal to do it correctly. I would take a somewhat rusty all original to a badly restored car any day of the week. Live and learn.
    69 911S #1379
    65 356 SC #130757

  6. #6
    Early S Reg #1395 LongRanger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    California High Desert
    Posts
    14,361
    Quote Originally Posted by Scott72 View Post
    . . . All I have to say is "never again". Our 69S was "restored" if that is what you want to call it. Amazing what hides under a nice coat of paint. Don't think it went 50 miles in said "restored" condition before another complete strip to metal to do it correctly. I would take a somewhat rusty all original to a badly restored car any day of the week. Live and learn . . .
    And speaking of restorations . . .
    http://www.early911sregistry.org/for...l=1#post509309

    . . . time for an update . . . maybe? . . .




    ............

    .........

    We Can Be Heroes

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Corvallis, OR
    Posts
    2,563
    I've gone through all the photos of that car and you'll have to start from scratch on that one. Bare metal and go from there.
    72S, 72T now ST

  8. #8
    Senior Member StephenAcworth's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Chelsea, Québec
    Posts
    3,201
    In these 50 year old cars there are a lot of hidden ‘extras’ that you only discover if you take them back to bare metal... most people do the cosmetic stuff and the easy stuff and hope the hidden stuff doesn’t reveal itself during their ownership!
    Ask me how I know... my 1966 coupe was in pretty good shape overall and most people advised me to just drive it... but I wanted to do right by the car and so decided to go to bare metal (the car had been resprayed in the 1970s - so not original any more)... lots of pinhole rust in lots of places... and some ingenious welding to ‘support’ the front suspension pan ... all of which was horrible... and very unsafe... whilst I haven’t been able to drive the car for a couple of years, at least I know it will be solid when it comes back... and everything is done and documented by a reputable shop...
    1966 911 Coupe - Slate Grey - 304598 - still in restoration!

    Member #1616

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Darien, CT
    Posts
    297
    Eight years after being bought as “restored” this is were our car now stands.

    Rick - one of these days I’ll update the restoration thread. Just such a glacial pace it would bore everyone.
    Name:  B7DF8917-6870-45FA-B0CF-F737A4A182E5.jpg
Views: 265
Size:  91.3 KB
    69 911S #1379
    65 356 SC #130757

  10. #10
    Early S Reg #1395 LongRanger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    California High Desert
    Posts
    14,361
    Quote Originally Posted by Scott72 View Post
    . . . Eight years after being bought as “restored” . . . .one of these days I’ll update the restoration thread. Just such a glacial pace it would bore everyone . . .
    I hear ya, Scott, but nothing underlines what some of these projects take to complete like a thread like yours

    And I doubt that anyone 'll be bored . . .

    Besides --- threads like this are what inspired me



    . . . + only eight years, huh?




    Some 've taken longer . . .
    http://www.early911sregistry.org/for...-of-9112300023





    .........

    .........

    We Can Be Heroes

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.