Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 34

Thread: IROC Challenge Australia

  1. #21
    sure the cost of a SC may be cheap. but doing it up to specs will be $$$ just the same.

  2. #22
    My 2c worth: I fail to see the logic in creating yet another car single series spec (that can't be used/bought/sold anywhere else) when the FIA has an existing spec for 3.0RSR's. The FIA cars are used in several Euro series and, I think, some stateside too.
    Cheers, Ryan

    Founder and chief centre cap remover at : ZOLLHAUS / Design driven custom PORSCHE : https://zoll.haus

  3. #23
    Senior Member Fishcop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Port Macquarie, Australia
    Posts
    1,782
    Quote Originally Posted by obrut View Post
    My 2c worth: I fail to see the logic in creating yet another car single series spec (that can't be used/bought/sold anywhere else) when the FIA has an existing spec for 3.0RSR's. The FIA cars are used in several Euro series and, I think, some stateside too.
    Kill-joy
    John Forcier
    EarlyS #1987
    1968 911 Race Car "Grun Hilda"
    1969 S/T interpretation "Blau Healer"
    Restoration Saga

  4. #24
    Fishie,

    Don't get me wrong, I love the idea of an IROC clone series per se - I just think it should be done without creating yet another spec (that suits nothing else).

    If they went FIA people could buy compliant cars from o/seas (and sell them back when done). All the organisers would need to do is control the single colours. Controlling the camshafts and the gear ratios as per the draft regs (which are already controlled under FIA) won't do much to contain costs. A better cost measure would be limit tyres (e.g. one set for min'm 2 or 3 rounds).

    Its the same problem that a lot of the Aussie tarmac rally cars have - they don't really suit anything else so they just sit in people's sheds.
    Cheers, Ryan

    Founder and chief centre cap remover at : ZOLLHAUS / Design driven custom PORSCHE : https://zoll.haus

  5. #25
    Building and buying a 3.0 RSR FIA spec engine/car is $$$.

    Here is an IROC bodied SC in Sydney with a 188hp 3.0 (stock) with exhaust, weight taken out and good gears, LSD etc. It has run 1.50 around Sydney Motor sport Park.
    Something like this with 15's and slicks would be fun while keeping cost down..
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Matt Hart
    matthartcreative@instagram
    RHD 914
    1980 911SC (sold)
    69' T (sold)
    Early 911s reg # 994

  6. #26
    I agree it would - but the draft spec's look more like the TCM cars. Coilovers, twin plug 3.6, big brakes.
    Cheers, Ryan

    Founder and chief centre cap remover at : ZOLLHAUS / Design driven custom PORSCHE : https://zoll.haus

  7. #27
    In that case it will appeal to guys coming from GT3 Challenge and the like..
    Matt Hart
    matthartcreative@instagram
    RHD 914
    1980 911SC (sold)
    69' T (sold)
    Early 911s reg # 994

  8. #28
    Senior Member CamBiscuit's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Adelaide, Australia
    Posts
    1,447
    Thinking about Matts post above, and mulling it over for a few days I'd like to see the class pretty stock.

    Stock 3.0 engine with overbore
    Spec FG bumpers, bonnet, guards & tail.
    Plastic windows
    Interior free, FIA seats required.
    Gearbox ratios free with LSD
    Stock brakes with pads open
    Spec cage
    Spec torsions, shocks & sways

    Poor mans Porsche racing. Don't make it a money race and you'll attract a bigger field.

    Open to 2.7 to 3.0 vintage cars.
    Looking for engine # 6208151
    '74 RS 3.0 Replica
    '70 911E Bahia Red (SOLD)
    '71 911 S/T Replica 2.3 Twin plug BEAST (SOLD)
    Australian TYP 901 Register #78
    Early S Registry # 1076

  9. #29
    Senior Member Fishcop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Port Macquarie, Australia
    Posts
    1,782
    Quote Originally Posted by Cam Arnott View Post
    Thinking about Matts post above, and mulling it over for a few days I'd like to see the class pretty stock.

    Stock 3.0 engine with overbore
    Spec FG bumpers, bonnet, guards & tail.
    Plastic windows
    Interior free, FIA seats required.
    Gearbox ratios free with LSD
    Stock brakes with pads open
    Spec cage
    Spec torsions, shocks & sways

    Poor mans Porsche racing. Don't make it a money race and you'll attract a bigger field.

    Open to 2.7 to 3.0 vintage cars.
    Agree. There's enough G series cars floating about to make this viable and no more expensive than running Group S. But in a way I also agree with Captain Kill Joy that there is a 'real' IROC spec available, so why not do it properly? Big differences in cost though!

    Perhaps it'll be like HQ racing; a lot of fun for a while until the HQs run out
    John Forcier
    EarlyS #1987
    1968 911 Race Car "Grun Hilda"
    1969 S/T interpretation "Blau Healer"
    Restoration Saga

  10. #30
    For the record, I agree with the povo-spec theory too - but that is not what is being considered at present.
    Cheers, Ryan

    Founder and chief centre cap remover at : ZOLLHAUS / Design driven custom PORSCHE : https://zoll.haus

Similar Threads

  1. early car challenge for experts
    By hesaputz in forum General Info
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 12-06-2017, 01:36 AM
  2. A challenge? 1970S resto
    By timgt3 in forum Australia
    Replies: 44
    Last Post: 12-08-2012, 01:17 PM
  3. early car challenge for experts
    By hesaputz in forum For Sale/Wanted: Early 911 Cars, 1965 - 1973
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-07-2012, 01:58 PM
  4. CSRG Charity Challenge
    By John Z Goriup in forum Drives, Tours, Gatherings, Racing and Adventures
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-03-2011, 07:31 PM
  5. Cornpanzer - I Smell a Challenge!!!
    By JCR in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-23-2006, 07:28 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.