Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20

Thread: 906 rocker arms...Value??

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Tehachapi California---93561
    Posts
    66

    906 rocker arms...Value??

    Competition Engineering (Lake Isabella, Calif) has finished the rebuilding of my early 1966 2.0. engine. During the rebuild, he came across the 906 rocker arms that were installed at the factory(?). The owner of Comp. Eng., Walt, suggested that back in the day they sort of grabbed any thing existing at the time to assemble the engine. Walt cleaned and polished the rockers, set them aside and installed a more suitable valve train.

    Do you have any insights to my question? Thanks ...Skeeters

    Name:  various 031.jpg
Views: 361
Size:  35.5 KBName:  various 037.jpg
Views: 359
Size:  36.2 KBName:  various 034.jpg
Views: 341
Size:  29.9 KBName:  various 038.jpg
Views: 338
Size:  37.2 KB
    Last edited by 1red66911; 10-11-2017 at 02:52 PM. Reason: adding pictures
    1966 Porsche 911
    1960 Chevrolet Corvair Monza 900
    2000 911 C2
    1979 Crossle F-35 F/F
    1969 Lynx Mk 2 F/V

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Scottsdale, AZ
    Posts
    9,752
    How about a photo?

  3. #3
    Hard to believe they were so short of parts that they grabbed rockers that required lash caps to set the clearance. Something the average dealer ship or shop back then wasn't likely to have. Be glad to take those nasty useless things off your hands,,,,so you don't clutter up your trash can
    Early S Registry member #90
    R Gruppe member #138
    Fort Worth Tx.

  4. #4
    Not to mention the shorter valves

  5. #5
    Good point !!
    Early S Registry member #90
    R Gruppe member #138
    Fort Worth Tx.

  6. #6
    Member #226 R Gruppe Life Member #147
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    2,409
    Ditto on short valves, about 2mm shorter valve stems.

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Scottsdale, AZ
    Posts
    9,752
    How about those photos?

  8. #8
    Early 911S Registry # 237 NeunElf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    San Dimas, CA
    Posts
    1,812
    Are the rocker arms you're talking about by any chance forged steel with bronze bushings?

    The earliest 911 engines used these. I don't know when rocker arms changed to castings without bushings but it's quite likely they were used early in the 1966 model year. Do you have an originally Solex-carbureted 901/01 engine?

    The only source I can find right now is the caption on a photo in Bruce Anderson's Porsche 911 Performance Handbook. It's page 77 in the second edition.

    According to Bruce's caption, the 906 (and most racing 911s) used a forged rocker arm without a bushing and adjusted valve clearance with a lash cap.
    Jim Alton
    Torrance, CA
    Early 911S Registry # 237

    1965 Porsche 911 coupe
    1958 Porsche 356A cabriolet

  9. #9
    906 Rockers never had bushes and the factory original had oil grooves machined into the lower half of the bore. They were used with a 'Motorsport' Rocker shaft which had a surface treatment to prevent galling and the heel and nose were hard chrome plated.

    This design of rocker was used right through at least until the 935 although the number of different thickness lash caps increased in the last few years.

    The Forged Steel Adjustable Rockers lasted until the 1967 MY when they were replaced by investment cast rocker without bushes. This lasted until 1969 when the cast rocker finally gained a Glyco steel backed bush and Rocker Shafts stopped suffering from serious adhesive wear.

    The change to Investment cast steel rockers took place all over Europe at around this time and was simply driven by cost. I believe Porsche also took advantage of the brittle nature of these casting to promote the idea that they made this change to save valve trains when engines lost their timing.

    I also believe that the reality is that the original Mercedes inspired tensioner was poor which was the cause of cam timing problems and the cheaper rocker was just a stroke of luck.

    Trying to control the impact strength of a cast steel is notoriously difficult and in 1967 virtually impossible and if you measure the force needed to break a cast rocker it is still significant.

    The 906 Rocker was being manufactured in the UK for a number of years but this supply has now dried up.

    They are available in Germany from Capricorn Motorsport at 600 Euros per rocker + Lash Caps. If the hard chrome is in good order the value of these rockers is quite high.

    We have just produced the first batch of forgings to also reproduce this rocker and we are also machining the lash caps to the original spec.

    The 906 Style Rocker has been specifically banned for Period F Appendix K Race Cars and due to this fact we have reproduced the original 1965/1966 Forged Rockers and have been supplying them for about 6 years now. and they are widely used in a number of race engines.

    With have increased the length of the heel so that this rocker runs comfortably on a 906 Cam.

    We have also been re-manufacturing the Surface Treated 'Motorsport' style Rocker shaft for several years.

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Tehachapi California---93561
    Posts
    66
    It is a Solex-carbureted 90101. Chassis #303636
    1966 Porsche 911
    1960 Chevrolet Corvair Monza 900
    2000 911 C2
    1979 Crossle F-35 F/F
    1969 Lynx Mk 2 F/V

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.