Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.
Originally Posted by uptheorg
This thread to me has gone from the sublime to the ridiculous -- what are we talking about? Nobody here seems to know. There is a lot of discussion about semantics and sarcasm, but nobody is learning anything about the cars in question, including the OP Bowzer. He has gotten a few opinions about the original two cars based on scant knowledge and all those opinions seem to agree that an "S" is a better car and rarer, too. Now he is mixing in a short wheelbase car with a long wheelbase car. And it doesn't seem that he has personally inspected any of them!?! He might as well be discussing whether he should buy a late model P-car or a first generation car as far as I am concerned. Sheeesh!
Reply With Quote