"He's Baaaack....."

[Soterik]

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-t...sition-11.html

This was the first page where "all the fun starts"....

[setho]

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-t...sition-11.html

This was the first page where "it started"....

Ah this thread rehash is great.

"Now you're living in your own private Idaho."

[37yrold911]

here kids, stare at this a while:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...-with-one-gif/

[Frank Beck]

Looks like we have some work to do if we expect to reach that 2 degree mark by 2020!

[setho]

I love this line:

"But when that pollution was cleared away, around the 1970s, a sharper warming trend began."

Maybe we need to pollute more to fight global warming!

[37yrold911]

I love this line:

"But when that pollution was cleared away, around the 1970s, a sharper warming trend began."

Maybe we need to pollute more to fight global warming!

that's true - particulates in the air will reduce warming effects, in general

to really counter GHG effects, you will need a nuclear winter tho

[Tdskip]

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-t...sition-11.html

This was the first page where "it started"....

Funny how you did not mention that you jumped into that thread and then made a known to be total false statement.

I might also point out that your personal attack on me in the Early S was so vicious...

What does chasing someone to a different board and then making a false personal attack say about you Eric?

I continue to believe that sort of personally directed - going so far as resorting to making stuff up - attack reflects poorly on people that make it as well as being the antithesis of what this forum wants to be known for.

[Tdskip]

I love this line:

"But when that pollution was cleared away, around the 1970s, a sharper warming trend began."

Exactly as the models forecast, rise in CO2 and other forces will continue to result in warming.

BTW - you are engaged in motivated reasoning again which is a psychological crutch used by those who are incapable of dealing with reality for what it is.

" motivated reasoning, where instead of evidence being evaluated critically, it is deliberately interpreted in such a way as to reaffirm a pre-existing belief, demanding impossibly stringent examination of unwelcome evidence while accepting uncritically even the flimsiest information that suits one's needs.

...A series of investigations published last year by Prof Stephan Lewandowsky and his colleagues – including one with the fantastic title, Nasa Faked the Moon Landing – Therefore, (Climate) Science Is a Hoax: An Anatomy of the Motivated Rejection of Science – found that while subjects subscribing to conspiracist thought tended to reject all scientific propositions they encountered, those with strong traits of conservatism or pronounced free-market world views only tended to reject scientific findings with regulatory implications....


https://www.theguardian.com/science/...ated-reasoning

[Tdskip]

Looks like we have some work to do if we expect to reach that 2 degree mark by 2020!

You have provided no data points or evidence. Because there is no science in your accusations and questions I reject your comments.

You are factually incorrect in any case Frank;

[/B]
March 2016 set a new record temperature for that time of year, according to NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies. The global temperature was 2.30 °F (1.28 °C) warmer than the average for March...

Citation: http://climate.nasa.gov/news/2432/

[Tdskip]

Ah this thread rehash is great.

"Now you're living in your own private Idaho."

Inadvertently funny - someone who has never posted actual science but denies the science makes accusation of others of "living in your own private Idaho".