Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: Steering column bearing

  1. #1

    Steering column bearing

    Is it possible to replace the steering column bearing without removing the whole steering assembly as per workshop manual? Seems a bit excessive, seems like it should be possible to remove the post extension without taking the whole thing off. Before I start on this I wondered if anyone has done this job before?
    '65 911 RHD 300882

  2. #2
    I did that in a 79 a few years back. It was a pita as I recall using a dremel to cut bearing to remove it. I think was still faster than removing the column but not much.

  3. #3
    Senior Member 30westrob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    SE Pennsylvania
    Posts
    169
    I used a body dent puller with slide hammer. A few of the balls came loose and I had to fish them out of places they should not be. Per post above, pita. Rob

  4. #4
    I've been trying to avoid this job for a while but the play and rattle over bumps is now too significant and is spoiling my enjoyment of the car
    '65 911 RHD 300882

  5. #5
    Does the symptom feel like the steering wheel has play in it at the upper section and is it the standard factory wood rim wheel? The reason I ask is that I've come across no end in SWB 911's. Usually they've had the steering wheel removed for whatever reason and the orientation of the spring and washer is the wrong way around which makes it feel like it has terrible play and rattles over road bumps. It fits the opposite way that you'd logically think. Have you got an early parts manual?

  6. #6
    WET '65-'69 911 Fig. 4-2a, Steering Wheel & Column
    Name:  _WET_'65-'69_911_Fig4-2a,Steering_Wheel-Column.jpg
Views: 465
Size:  181.4 KB

    Quote Originally Posted by Schläfer View Post
    Have you got an early parts manual?

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Carmel Valley
    Posts
    67
    Like to add thoughts here as well, agree with above post. I have a 71’ that had play as well, thought it was the bearing then read several threads related to improper installation of #49 and48. Sure the idiot (me) installed them incorrectly. Once corrected no play. One of the simplest jobs I have done on this car.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Southern Ca.
    Posts
    1,337
    My experience is that many times # 48 is missing . I have never seen a loose bearing .

  9. #9
    Very interesting and thank you for this insight. I will check the simple things first and report!
    '65 911 RHD 300882

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Richy View Post
    My experience is that many times # 48 is missing . I have never seen a loose bearing .
    I'd agree with this. It's always part number 48

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.