Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Shortening LWB arms to SWB car

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Wilmington, DE
    Posts
    1,466

    Shortening LWB arms to SWB car

    Is there anyone set up to shorten LWB trailing arms to fit on a SWB car. I can take them to my metal guy but if someone already has a jig to make the adjustment, it might save a lot of work. Thanks
    A part isn't purchased until paid.

    The 9 Store LLC.

  2. #2
    I modified my SWB bearing hubs to use LWB banana arms after re-locating inner pickup points. Lots of work. I aligned rear wheels and then "Floated" the LWB banana arms to fit between SWB bearing housings and the inner pickup point.

    LWB banana arms will require cutting near the hub to allow the shortened banana to mate up with inner pivot. I suggest you make left & right jigs using SWB arms as masters. Be wary of lower shock mount location, if LWB shock location is fundamentally different from SWB location then you may have a shock tube clearance issue with the pocket in the cross member.
    Paul Abbott
    Early S Member #18
    Weber service specialist
    www.PerformanceOriented.com
    info@PerformanceOriented.com
    530.520.5816

  3. #3
    If you're going to all that trouble, best to use a set of aluminum arms from a '74+ car.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Wilmington, DE
    Posts
    1,466
    Quote Originally Posted by 1QuickS View Post
    I modified my SWB bearing hubs to use LWB banana arms after re-locating inner pickup points. Lots of work. I aligned rear wheels and then "Floated" the LWB banana arms to fit between SWB bearing housings and the inner pickup point.

    LWB banana arms will require cutting near the hub to allow the shortened banana to mate up with inner pivot. I suggest you make left & right jigs using SWB arms as masters. Be wary of lower shock mount location, if LWB shock location is fundamentally different from SWB location then you may have a shock tube clearance issue with the pocket in the cross member.
    Paul - Thanks for your input. Left and right jigs are going to be the starting point. I want the hub and caliper mounting of the lwb but the length of the swb. I'll keep an eye on the shock location. The chassis is bare and up on a rotisserie so pretty easy to test fit to make sure we are on the right track.

    ibmiked - I've seen aluminum trailing arms used on early lwb cars. It's not a big deal to make it work. I want to keep swb length trailing arms on my swb car so the amount of fab and welding to an aluminum trailing arm is more than I'm ready to take on.
    A part isn't purchased until paid.

    The 9 Store LLC.

  5. #5
    From a structural point of view: The connection of the banana tube on a SWB is MUCH more robust than for the LWB. When racing the RSRs, the hub to banana arm connection required reinforcement due to the extreme loading. LWB hubs allow larger calipers but most of braking force is at front so big calipers on a SWB are not so important. LWB bearings are easy to get compared to those in SWB hubs. Also, LWB hubs allow for larger CV joints.

    I like having SWB hubs on my car due to the original design of the bearings that support the hub spreads the loading nicely within the hub and due to the robust connection to the banana is possible as a result of the bearing separation within the hub. The LWB hubs provide extra length for the CV axles which needed as much length as possible to accommodate the permanent angularity of the axles due to increasing the wheelbase length by 2.25 inches. By selecting a duplex bearing set the CV axles could be longer but this led to a weak banana to hub connection. The original design is the cleanest design.
    Paul Abbott
    Early S Member #18
    Weber service specialist
    www.PerformanceOriented.com
    info@PerformanceOriented.com
    530.520.5816

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Wilmington, DE
    Posts
    1,466
    Quote Originally Posted by 1QuickS View Post
    From a structural point of view: The connection of the banana tube on a SWB is MUCH more robust than for the LWB. When racing the RSRs, the hub to banana arm connection required reinforcement due to the extreme loading. LWB hubs allow larger calipers but most of braking force is at front so big calipers on a SWB are not so important. LWB bearings are easy to get compared to those in SWB hubs. Also, LWB hubs allow for larger CV joints.

    I like having SWB hubs on my car due to the original design of the bearings that support the hub spreads the loading nicely within the hub and due to the robust connection to the banana is possible as a result of the bearing separation within the hub. The LWB hubs provide extra length for the CV axles which needed as much length as possible to accommodate the permanent angularity of the axles due to increasing the wheelbase length by 2.25 inches. By selecting a duplex bearing set the CV axles could be longer but this led to a weak banana to hub connection. The original design is the cleanest design.
    The car is getting a 3.2 so using the later cv's is a bonus.
    A part isn't purchased until paid.

    The 9 Store LLC.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.