Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Throwout fork hitting pressure plate

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Central Florida
    Posts
    90

    Throwout fork hitting pressure plate

    I'm nearing the end of the restoration of my '71T. The engine is installed and running, but I have an issue with the clutch release. According to the factory manual, the throwout fork must move 15mm to release the clutch. I can only get 7-8mm before the fork hits the pressure plate. I've tried adjusting the pedal freeplay, the pedal stop and the cable length.

    New clutch disk; new throwout bearing; new pivot ball, thick cone washer, spring and shim; original pressure plate; original flywheel, surfaced.

    It looks like the throwout fork needs to move forward (toward the front of the vehicle) to give it more room to release, but I don't see how that can be done.

    Any tips or suggestions are appreciated. Thank you.

    dho
    dho
    Central Florida
    Member # 1968

  2. #2
    Senior Member Scott A's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    South East USA
    Posts
    1,017
    With no cable on it.
    Then you can see how far it goes from stop to stop.
    And you can use a long screwdriver or crowbar to lever the fork…to see how much travel you have.

    See if you get your full travel.

    That should give you some clues as to where it is hanging up.

    Name:  IMG_6034.jpg
Views: 374
Size:  62.2 KB
    Last edited by Scott A; 06-13-2024 at 08:10 AM.

    Current long term ownership: 63 Cab, 71 911, 74 914

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Central Florida
    Posts
    90
    Update: I spent time this afternoon under the car and talking with Scott A, who had good suggestions. As best I can tell, everything is mounted as depicted in the diagram Scott posted above. It appears that the pivot point of the fork (where the bolt goes through) needs to move toward the bell housing, so that the arm will have enough room to move toward the rear, to release the clutch, without hitting the pressure plate. However, I don't see how to accomplish this with the existing hardware. (I'm using JimmyT's pivot bolt, which I assume has the same dimensions as the stock bolt.)
    I appreciate any thoughts or suggestions!

    dho
    dho
    Central Florida
    Member # 1968

  4. #4
    You need to shim the pivot bolt. Usually a valve cover washer will work.
    Early S Registry member #90
    R Gruppe member #138
    Fort Worth Tx.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Central Florida
    Posts
    90
    Ed, where would the shim (washer) go? If I put it between the bolt and the bell housing, won't that move the fork towards the engine (to the rear) and make the problem worse? It appears that the fork needs to move toward the bellhousing, so that the fork arm has room to move rearward when the clutch pedal is pressed. Would a thinner cone washer accomplish this?

    Thank you for your thoughts and suggestions.

    dho
    dho
    Central Florida
    Member # 1968

  6. #6
    Senior Member Scott A's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    South East USA
    Posts
    1,017
    I also think the spacers need to be thinner.
    (In its current state, assuming things are right in there)

    It really must be that we both have pressure plates that are thicker than normal.
    And it causes us a need to modify the spacers to ‘thinner’.

    Current long term ownership: 63 Cab, 71 911, 74 914

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by dho View Post
    I'm using JimmyT's pivot bolt, which I assume has the same dimensions as the stock bolt.
    Given your issue, you should confirm that and not assume it.
    The original '70-'71 multi-piece pivot bolt and the factory replacement 1-piece pivot bolt have different dimensions.

    If Jimmy T produced his part as a direct replacement for the original multi-piece part, then it doesn't use the thick conical washer that you're using
    He doesn't mention or offer the conical washer anywhere in his classified ad or his follow-up posts... https://www.early911sregistry.org/fo...911-116-772-11

    Jon B.
    Vista, CA

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Central Florida
    Posts
    90
    Jon, you are correct. (I know what you do when you “assume”.) Scott was gracious enough to come down this evening and we were able to: compare a stock pivot bolt with Jimmy’s bolt, and they are substantially the same; and, look inside the bell housing with his scope and confirm everything was installed correctly. At this point, the engine needs to come out to inspect and identify a solution. Because of my schedule, this will probably happen in mid July. I appreciate everyone’s suggestions and assistance, including Jimmy, who promptly responded to my emails; and particularly, Scott, who took the time to drive down from Gainesville this evening to help sort things out.
    dho
    dho
    Central Florida
    Member # 1968

  9. #9
    Senior Member Scott A's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    South East USA
    Posts
    1,017
    A couple things I thought about on the drive home.
    1. The more worn the fork points/bumps are, the closer your fork gets to the pressure plate.

    2. If the fork points are off the throw-out wings, like they slipped off, then the fork gets closer to the pressure plate.
    ( this seems most likely the cause) the distance between the forks can wear too big and the throw out wings can get out of place.

    3. Maybe , before you take out the engine, you buy a spare (new or used) fork. So you are ready to install if needed.

    Name:  Image_2024-06-14 18_29_34_569.jpg
Views: 307
Size:  62.1 KB

    Above: This image shows a lot, pizza slice spring plate, holding the throw out bearing, the ball-joint bolt & even some side of the fork’s tong. Shows bevel washer & tongue spring. I wish it showed if the bearing was slightly turned. And the flats, if out of place.

    Name:  IMG_6103.jpg
Views: 300
Size:  57.7 KB

    Above: the orange is the top of the fork, but is it the bump? Or did the bearing rotate away from the bump?

    4. You know how you have to rotate the throw-out bearing to separate the transmission.
    Then you have to rotate the bearing back 90, when you have it back together, are you 100 percent certain that you rotated the wings on the bearing back the 90 degrees?
    Last edited by Scott A; 06-15-2024 at 03:52 AM.

    Current long term ownership: 63 Cab, 71 911, 74 914

  10. #10
    Assuming all other factors correct, when a flywheel is machined the pressure plate moves away from the pivot. The shim moves the pivot back closer to the pressure plate plate.
    Early S Registry member #90
    R Gruppe member #138
    Fort Worth Tx.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.