Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: '68 911S on Rennlist

  1. #1

    '68 911S on Rennlist

    Anyone see this. Sellling price $74.5K.
    Harold #334

  2. #2
    Senior Member tfmcmahon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Tucson,AZ
    Posts
    648
    Member:S Registry #864

  3. #3
    I usually refrain from commenting on "For Sale" cars but I started to download all the pics just in case I ever purchased an 68S . For $75K I would think one would get a more accurate restoration. For example - front bumper, door panels, engine bay and trunk color, decklid hinge color, all US or non-US matching turnsignals, nicely painted air filter housing, etc. Seems to me if you're going to ask that kind of money you would expect...better.
    All in all it's a nice car but with the above it tends to have the domino effect...if this is incorrect what else do I have to look for and then have re-done. Then again if I had $75K to spend then I guess I would have additional money to correct these things.
    _B
    Sent from a pay phone

    888888 eL, Oph'eL'ia

    Instagram: werk_crew
    www.werkcrew.com
    www.werkcrew.tumblr.com
    www.handofwinter.tumblr.com

  4. #4
    Defender of the Normal John Fusco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    1,926
    Anyone notice how GD beautiful these cars are ?!

    John

    Du must schwein haben

    901/05 #305701

    Bultaco Metralla 62 M8
    1968 BMW R69S

    Early911SReg #606

  5. #5
    Senior Member BBausser's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Sutalle, Ga.
    Posts
    913
    Front Air Dam is wrong as well as the side Deco and the instrument rims are black not chrome and then the matter of the 68 year which was not imported to the US so then the Euro stuff is missing
    Currently:
    67 3.6 Rocket "Silver"
    62 T6 Outlaw Coupe "ole Yellow"
    65 F100 Custom Cab Flairside Shortbed

    Gone but not forgotten in last 2 years:
    67S Concours King
    67 912 Vintage Racer
    68 912 Flipper
    83 911SC
    93 Mo30 968

    too many cars before that

    Early S Registry # 787
    R Gruppe # 551

    "its better to wear out then rust out"

  6. #6
    Senior Member gulf908's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    1,166
    if you're going to ask that kind of money you would expect...better...

    Bob,

    For this sort of money,you should expect something toward a 300 point PCA show car.
    Unless the pics are sending my eyes funny,Polo red should be a bit darker,yes?
    The colour seems to be either Guards red or tangerine or a mix of the two.

    Cheers,
    Dennis.
    1970 914-6 - materialised from the 'Lotto' garage into reality
    1971 2.2 911 S - now back in the UK - sob!
    1975 Carrera Targa (ROW) - missed.
    One of us is fast becoming a valuable antique.
    S Registry member 536
    Australian TYP 901 Register Member 44

  7. #7
    Senior Member tfmcmahon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Tucson,AZ
    Posts
    648

    Reality check

    Could it be that someone in Houston has read the comments here? The car is now on e-bay.The color issue would be an expensive issue to get right,if in fact it`s off.Still looks very nice and even better $20,000 cheaper! TFM
    Member:S Registry #864

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Wilywilly
    Front Air Dam is wrong as well as the side Deco and the instrument rims are black not chrome and then the matter of the 68 year which was not imported to the US so then the Euro stuff is missing
    Bill why do you think the front air dam is wrong?

    Also, as far as I've seen, instrument rims in a 68 should be black, and the side deco also looks right to me (why do you think it's wrong Bill?) as for the Euro stuff, it has the wrong front turn signals, but I can't see anything else Euro missing, do point it out for me please.

    It does have the wrong front spoiler (it should have fog lights) and the wrong steering wheel.

    BTW the price seems to have been dropped to $56K.
    Henry
    1965 356 SC
    1968 911S
    1971 914-6
    1979 930

  9. #9
    B-b-buy Bushwood?!?!
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Topanga Canyon, CA
    Posts
    738
    '84 Guards Red + '72 Front Air Dam does not = $56,000.
    Sandy Isaac
    '69 911E
    #543

  10. #10
    Also, wrong steering wheel butterfly, no fender reflectors (it's a 68 only thing), and the engine compartment has been sprayed the body color, instead of the correct black. I must say that the car looks to be pretty thoroughly restored - maybe too restored. Everything just looks a little too knew and aftermarket for my tastebuds. I don't know if I would get the feeling that I am buying a 68 911S when everything looks "too new".
    As for the front spoiler, I am generally against it on the SWB's, but having wound my 67 911 up to 135mph + on the Autobahn a few times, things start to feel a little shifty - especially in a headwind. I would probably bolt on the original front bumper for show, and mount the the spoiler for go...

Similar Threads

  1. FS: @rennlist.com - 1969 911S Track Car - 119300819 - $30k
    By beh911 in forum For Sale/Wanted: Early 911 Cars, 1965 - 1973
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-29-2013, 04:57 AM
  2. Saw this ad on rennlist
    By serie1926 in forum For Sale/Wanted: Early 911 Cars, 1965 - 1973
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-08-2012, 08:30 AM
  3. FS: '93 964 C2 on Rennlist
    By popowitz in forum For Sale/Wanted: Other Porsche Cars and Parts
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-24-2010, 07:38 AM
  4. 71T F/S on Rennlist
    By scargo69s in forum For Sale/Wanted: Early 911 Cars, 1965 - 1973
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-23-2007, 11:02 AM
  5. '73E w/48K mi. on Rennlist
    By cosley in forum For Sale/Wanted: Early 911 Cars, 1965 - 1973
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-20-2005, 04:54 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.