Not mine, someone may be interested in this 68S on eBay...
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...m=300004727873Originally Posted by Seller
Not mine, someone may be interested in this 68S on eBay...
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...m=300004727873Originally Posted by Seller
I believe it should be quoted as saying " not one ounce of truth to the content of this sellers' description"
It's patently obvious this young gentleman knows not the error of his ways..
or his purchases for that matter..Quote" engine and transmission original to car ,matching numbers..
(matching numbers of unfamiliar parts!)
With an early 80's 3 liter and who knows what tranny ,the customization 80's
style is complete..
To bad probably was a great car at some time ,long ago ,it's in DC so if anyone wants a closer look (doubt it) its in the vicinity,thanks and with the
caveat if seller is a board member..he should know better!
But he quotes such marvellous figures of other cars:
Plus he concludes by saying he is a:Please bid with confidence as Keith Martin's Collectible Sports Car Market Guide indicates a low price of $22,000 and $28,000 for a high price of a stock 911 Targa. Since this is a highly modified custom Strosek I expect the bidding to go up to the high $30K to $40K range.
Here are a few documented Keith Martin's Sports Car Maket recent auction results on stock 911 Targa's from late 60's to early 70's.
February 2006 Page 92: 1965 911 Coupe 77K mile, condition 3 plus, Sold for $46,552.
February 2006 Keith Martin's Price Guide Page 122: low $22K high $28K, 1968 911 STarga, 2.0, 6 Cylinder
June 2006 Page 128: 1967 and 1968 911 S 2.0 Targa, 180 HP, Total Production 1160, Top Speed 141 mph, 0-60, 7.5 sec.
May 2006 Page 82: 1967 911 Coupe 68K mil, condition 3 minus, not sold for $28K.
June 2006 Page106:1973 911S 2.4 liter Targa, condition 3 minus, 79000 KM, sold for $30,762.
June 2006 Page 95: 1971 911S 2.2 liter Coupe, 43000 KM, condition 1 minus, sold for $68.050.
P.S. I am a very serious car collector and you can call Bob Brady at World Famous AMG RennTech, 561-845-7888 for my credentials.![]()
That car might have been born on the same day as mine. It has VIN 11880241 and my car is 11830241. Luckily my car doesn't have the Strosek body kit!
(Yawn...)
"Next..."
The VIN is for a T...
Peter Kane
'72 911S Targa
Message Board Co-Moderator - Early 911S Registry #100
Poor Professor Porsche must be turning over in his grave ...
![]()
Howard Lazarus
Early S Registry #357
RGruppe #181
1971 911S Conda Green, Factory Airport Gears
1972 Corsican Rose Love Fest
Talk about misrepresentation...Originally Posted by 72targa
My favorite quote:
Q: Wow...absolutley fantastic car, incredible condition! This car just drips of 'authenticity', meticulous preperation and the elusive historical provenance. Since your a serious collector, I must ask you: I am interested in competing in concours and want to know if I can win with this car...am I a lock for a win? Will the judges be blown away by this cars rarity and cosmetic condition? Thanks!!
Jul-10-06
A: I don't believe that you will win first place with this car, maybe a close second or third. If the judges are conservative 911 bone stock factory purists, then the judges would not be very impressed with the car. On the other hand, if the judges are not conservative, then they would rate this car very highly by its rarity and cosmetic condition. They would also be very impressed with the special custom STROSEK modifications which would probably win first or second in show because of its rarity. I believe that conservative judges will grade this car from a scale 1 to 6 (1 being the best), they would rate this car a 3. Non-conservative judges will rate it a 2 which would equate to an 8 on a scale 1 to 10 which is an excellent rating.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Michael
'56 T-1 356 bent window coupe...
68 911L Burgandy Red R Gruppe #388
72 911S Coupe, Sepia Brown
...so I had to egg him on with that question. Unfortunately, I was laughing to myself too much and made some pretty lousy spelling errors, including the dreaded use of “your” instead of “you’re”!
I am strangely curious if the guy is trying to scam somebody or is just flat-out clueless….