I'm looking to buy an S after selling my T. Can someone tell me their driving impressions of a 69 2.0 vs 70/71 2.2 vs 72/73 2.4 cars.
Scott
I'm looking to buy an S after selling my T. Can someone tell me their driving impressions of a 69 2.0 vs 70/71 2.2 vs 72/73 2.4 cars.
Scott
i think since these are nearly 40 yr old cars you will want to buy the best speciman you can find, an apples to apples comparison in the real world of condition and price will be tough. if it were possible to have equal quality cars to choose from everyone will have their own opinion as to the best model yr based on their driving preference. best of luck with the search just buy the best you can afford and find.
Early 911S Registry #750
1970 911E - The Good Stuff
2001 Toyota Landcruiser
To me the chrecteristics of the S's are not that much different. Overall most people tend to like to 2.2 the best, still short (66 mm) stroke and high compression Vs. the 70.4 mm stroke and lower compression of the 2.4's. Some people tend to believe the 915 is a much better gearbox than the 901 but my experience is a well set up 901 shifts very nicely, but they are a weaker box. You can't wrong with any of them if you ask me.
Phil
Just a couple of things to consider (from my VAST experience)...
- SWB cars are more tail-happy than LWB cars (and to some that is a good thing)
- The 2.2 ltr cars have a very high compression ratio, typically requiring an octane boost over premium gas whereas the 2.4 will run on regular all day with its lower compression ratio
Peter Kane
'72 911S Targa
Message Board Co-Moderator - Early 911S Registry #100
Nothing sounds quite like a 2.0 S at full wail... To each their own.
Stefan Josef Koch
RGruppe #194/SRegistry #1063
1969 Porsche 911E, Light Ivory (38 years and counting)
2015 Porsche Cayman S
2012 BMW R1200GS, 1973 BMW R75/5
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools." -E. Hemingway
i know this doesn't answer your question but...i agree with boxster on this.
i have only owned my modified T since November but one thing i have determined for certain: When (not if) i buy another longhood i will be shopping for the best condition and color/model will be the absolute least of my concerns.
Erik
Early S # 1107
All my german equipment is either busted or sold...sigh....in the market for a decent non-sunroof tub!!!!!!! Help me get back to autocrossing!!!
Condition,condition,condition...
In particular the chassis. Mechanical issues can always be resolved, albeit expensive at times, but the chassis is the foundation. The percentage of straight, unrusted chassis to all the rest is small.
All things being equal I really like the 2.2S. If someone had a bored out 2.2 to 2.5S that would be alright with me as well.![]()
Bobby
71' Olive 2.2E Targa / Early S #491
I've always considered the glass to be half full...that is until I reached middle age and realized that it is actually half empty.
For another opinion, go to http://www.early911s.com/ and click "Year Ratings"
Ed Cave
Atlanta, GA
Member No. 738
1958 Porsche 356A Sunroof Coupe
1998 Porsche Carrera S
2008 Porsche Carrera S (her dd)
2013 Audi A7 (my dd)
I will echo the theme here: the best early S is the best one you can find, any displacement, any color. I prefer the short crank of the 2.0 - 2.2, but the 2.4 is great in its own way. My opinion is that the ratings in the above link are CRAP, but the feedback is spot on.
Kenik
- 1969 911S
- 1965/66 911
- S Reg #760
- RGruppe #389
I kinda like 'em!Originally Posted by kenikh
![]()
Peter Kane
'72 911S Targa
Message Board Co-Moderator - Early 911S Registry #100