Bitterness does not fade with age
Road & Track Guest Column
Bitterness does not fade with age
Road & Track Guest Column
Wow. Bitter for sure...
1968 911S
1986 Carrera
2006 Carrera S
1973 BMW 3.0CS - Frances (gone but not forgotten)
I read that too.
Darn near the entire issue was "Porsche" related.
Tom
Early S Registry #235
rgruppe #111
I thought it was well written. Porsches aren't flawless and the last five parapgraphs were very positive and it sounded like he's come around.
"Last fall, my son John and I were in the paddock at Lime Rock when we spotted a 911 Turbo S. John doesn't carry the Porsche baggage that I do, and he found the car stunning. To my surprise, I soon agreed with him".
That sounds like a ringing endorsement to me.
David
1972 911T Targa
1993 964 RSA #14
Early S Registry #1799
PAID MEMBER 2016-17
I see this differently...Sam is right (somewhat) His disdain of his own Porsche experience has some valid facts ,
The early 917s were bad until the long tail and his admitted inability to accept and deal with the 911s handling traits while others won!
That is racing, coming to terms with the equipment, track and your own ability
My 2 cents.......
Ron
1973.5 911T
1974 BMW R90/6 (Tupelo Honey)
1986 Carrera, Plan "B"
1987 BMW K100RS Motorsport
2004 BMW X3 6 speed manual
911s and their derivatives are horrible cars to drive .... when not setup correctly. I’m wondering how the other drivers would describe their non-winning car's handling?
These cars, when setup correctly and driven by someone who understands the advantages of rear engine configurations, are masterful and hard to beat: Hard braking means the vehicle center of gravity moves to just in front of center of the four wheels, traction during acceleration is aided by engine/trans mass over driven wheels.
The 901/911, designed in 1963, was a very versatile and heavily developed platform, a consistent winner across manifold competitive events, spanning decades. Where are/were the other cars today that Mr. Posey raced against, today?
Sam Posey is respected in many circles. His personal experiences with Porsches are not universal experiences; otherwise the 901/911 platforms would have been discontinued/abandoned years (decades) ago.
Last edited by Haasman; 05-04-2013 at 08:15 PM.
Haasman
Registry #2489
R Gruppe #722
65 911 #302580
70 914-6 #9140431874
73 911s #9113300709
Wow, and I used to really enjoy Sam's writing...
Mike de Jong | '71 911T/E 2.4 Tangerine | '74 911S 3.2 Ice Green
Mr. Posey (to me, at least) appears to suffer from preppy social-pecking-order baggage resulting from Hutschke von Hanstein's snub at Daytona in '66.
Probably just my own class-conscious glasses, but back in the day I saw him as a rich kid not quite out of a school blazer, with a rich Mommy buying him rides -- never as a professional. Posey's reminiscence conveniently forgets that one of his best-ever Can-Am finishes was at Laguna in '72 when Mommy rented him Vasek Polak's 3 year-old beater Porsche 917PA.
Get over it, dude!
The main problem I have with the article is he plays the gratuitous 'Nazi card'and describes the rear-engine design as "stupid". It's far from stupid. Different? Yes. And I'll let the 911 and 917 race records stand for themselves. I wonder if Sam has been hanging around with Bobby Unser lately
![]()
irregardless of his point of view, it was still fun to read it . . .
Jim
__________________________________________________ ___________
Early S Registry #2359
1970 Porsche 911 Rally 2.4
2018 Porsche Macan GTS