Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: 1971 Porsche 911 flywheel information needed

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    San Diego, California
    Posts
    26

    1971 Porsche 911 flywheel information needed

    I am restoring a 1971 Porsche 911e with my dad, when we took the flywheel off we had to put a 5ft bar on the wrench and put our full weight on it to get the bolts off. I dont think it should have been that hard to get the bolts off and was wondering if anyone knows the torque specifications for the bolts so we can put it back on correctly.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Phila Pa. area
    Posts
    1,260
    the spec book for a 1974 says 15 mkp
    Mike

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by mike curnow View Post
    the spec book for a 1974 says 15 mkp
    Correct for 1971 as well.
    15 mkp = 108 lbs-ft

    Jon B.
    Vista, CA

  4. #4
    Throw the bolts you removed in the garbage-- they are single use, "torque-to-yield' which means they permanently elongate when you torque them down. Look around the threads, do you see some pink chips? Those are the remains of red loctite which is frequently used on flywheel bolts as a precaution. Probably what happened is either 1) somebody put the bolts on with an impact wrench or 2) loctite was used or 3) both.

    With regard to the 12 point (XZN) tool you used to take the bolts off-- carefully file the end of the tool down to remove any rounding-over of the end. When you have a big torque episode like that the end often gets buggered. By filing it absolutely flat you can assure that you have excellent contact in the internal wrenching feature of the new bolts, so they don't strip at the high torque setting. When I do this (I have been doing it a lot lately) I actually take a hammer and tap the tool into the internal wrenching feature (gently) to make sure it is seated.

    I recommend the ARP flywheel bolts as these are high strength and are suitable for re-use. Follow their instructions to the letter. ARP 204-2802. They are also like $40 a set vs. $13 EACH for the factory Kamax bolts.

    http://arp-bolts.com/images/releases/pdfs/204-2802.pdf

    Good luck!
    1966 911 #304065 Irischgruen

  5. #5
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    San Diego, California
    Posts
    26
    Thank you for telling me this, however I looked at the threads and didn't see any pink on the the bolts or on the flywheel it self

  6. #6
    Sometimes things just get happy with one another and don't want to let go; it's not always an indication of stupidity or foul play from a previous repair. But, as stated above, replacing the bolts is important.
    -Marco
    SReg. #778 OGrp: #8 RGrp: #---
    TLG Auto: Website
    Searching for engine #907495 and gearbox 902/1 #229687

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by VaporiZe View Post
    ...we had to put a 5ft bar on the wrench and put our full weight on it to get the bolts off. I dont think it should have been that hard to get the bolts off...
    My elves always use a 5 foot bar to remove flywheel bolts...

    Yes, of course, replace those bolts as suggested. I didn't think you might consider re-using them.

    Jon B.

  8. #8
    Senior Member Fishcop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Port Macquarie, Australia
    Posts
    1,782
    Good to know there is an ARP alternative...

    I must have spent $600 or more over the years replacing these bolts. I wonder why they stuck with the 12 point design? Seems a perfect opportunity to change to a large hex head arrangement? I've always hated cranking hard on those fasteners!
    John Forcier
    EarlyS #1987
    1968 911 Race Car "Grun Hilda"
    1969 S/T interpretation "Blau Healer"
    Restoration Saga

  9. #9
    Member #226 R Gruppe Life Member #147
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    2,460
    I don't know about all of you, but I have seen a lot of metal transfer from flywheel to the crankshaft. Very common in high revving race engines. It is hard to say if flywheels were really loose. Somewhere down the line the bolt grading on factory bolts changed from 140 marking to branding letters. The aftermarket bolts grading went to 12.9. We use to torque the 140 graded bolts to 150 lbs on race engines and never had any issues. The 12.9 grade bolts heads would pop off at 120 lbs. I worry that the ARP bolts at 90lbs just aren't tight enough? Gordon

  10. #10
    The 70.4 mm stroke cranks were less rigid so the torsional vibrations got shifted down to 8,000 rpm. 66 mm cranks were more rigid so it was higher than what the valve springs and rods could take. The 9 bolt cranks got around the issue with the larger bolt circle diameter giving the clamping pressure more leverage.
    1971 911S, 2.7RS spec MFI engine, suspension mods, lightened
    Early 911S Registry Member #425

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 32
    Last Post: 04-23-2018, 06:58 AM
  2. Momo Steering Wheel Information Needed
    By Scooter 911 in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-12-2013, 11:23 PM
  3. 1967 911S flywheel identification help needed:
    By Silverbullit in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-01-2013, 02:05 PM
  4. 72T fuel distributor issue, information needed
    By Greg D. in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 08-05-2012, 11:09 AM
  5. Chasing Ghosts: Elva-Porsche Information Needed
    By Ghost Chaser in forum General Info
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-28-2010, 10:02 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.