The old battery question with a twist on testing
For the first time - ever - my 72 refused to crank... Found both Sonnenschein averaging 11.8 but even after a charge the voltage appears to be dropping too fast. (12.8-> 12.5 in a couple hours) while connected together. Separately one is 12.7 the other is 11.9 quickly...
I took them both out of the car to test them properly (and clean all the cables) and I see they are engraved with a date 11y old. Yikes. I recall being annoyed when I got them from Ft Lauderdale battery because they were already at least 3-4y old from memory but I guess 7y of service is fair !
I cannot get a proper CCA rating on the Sonnenchein A512 40A - anyone knows what it should be ?
They both tested as BAD on my solar tester despite OK voltage post charge (12.5 and 12.7 respectively) because I wasn't sure of what CCA to test against - one returned 206 CCA as AGMS (seems low) but 260 as Gel... So i guess I'm not even sure how to test those.. the, the bad one 6!!! Coincidentally I see sulfation coming from one of the plastic fill caps on that one.. So I guess I'm debating replacing one or both. One has for sure gone bad.
So quick Qs, 1)can anyone tell me if I'm testing those right ? AGMS setting (they are AGM as far as I know), I lower CCA to min (300) but it returns differnt 3 for GEL or AGMS. I thought they were AGM batteries, which is gel, the nomenclature may go over my head.
2) who has a the best deal or at least a decent deal on sonnenscheins, or in this day and age should I switch to something newer and better ? I like the stock setup but IMO the + terminal is too damn close to the top of the battery box for comfort and I see miata style batteries with side posts that appear a tad safer... Otherwise I hear Porsche has them now for $230 each, may do that..
thx !