Ownership listing was always hit or miss. That depended on the distributor to fill in the data, and not all were diligent. More likely to be filled in if the car had warranty claims.
Printable View
Ownership listing was always hit or miss. That depended on the distributor to fill in the data, and not all were diligent. More likely to be filled in if the car had warranty claims.
Both picked up in Germany. One had its first check-up / service in Switzerland (amag).
Driven around Europe before being shipped back to California.Attachment 545506Attachment 545507
Attachment 545562
My carl looks kind of boring.
1968 911 T Targa Sportomatic
Attachment 589902
1967 911 normale
Interloper question for the braintrust here- I am visiting from the transaxle world, trying to understand the relationship between production numbers and VINs. I see that the earliest Kardex with an explicit Production number was in 1970. Does anyone have insight on the temporal assignment of production numbers and VINs relative to the start of assembly? Production numbers were stamped on bodies before paint, I'm less clear on when VINs were assigned (stamped, VIN tags riveted on/VIN stickers applied).
I'm looking at a dataset of production numbers and VINs and there's some non-linearity (numerically lower VINs with numerically higher production numbers and vice versa) and am looking for insight on factory production line workflow from the 1970s (and assuming there were not significant differences between 911 and transaxle production practices)
^^^^ sounds like a question for davep!
Here’s mine:
Here's mine (1969 911T coupe). Mostly consistent with the COA:
Attachment 592496
VIN = 119310463
Eng# = 6391686
Trans# = 7196786
Prod# = ?
https://www.early911sregistry.org/fo...=1#post1148660
............