Type 901/xx Engine Build #'s

Hi Dave, here are some more from cars I have currently in my shop:

1967 911S 500458S 961808 901/02-8507
1968 911S 11801062 4081320 901/02-14960
1969 911S 119300891 6391275 901/10-21947
1968 911 11880194 3281145 901/14-14381
1968 911L 11855099 3281205 901/14-14636
1970 911E 1190210112 6200322 911/01-none
1972 911T/E 9112111340 6123165 011/01-none

Cheers, Henk.

Thanks Henk. That is a great help. I do have 961808 in my list, but with build 8607. Can you check that one again please.
Additional photos of 962170 case casting numbers. This is a great example of mixed revisions:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by davep

Thanks Henk. That is a great help. I do have 961808 in my list, but with build 8607. Can you check that one again please.
Additional photos of 962170 case casting numbers. This is a great example of mixed revisions:

---

Here are the pictures of that block Dave, must have been an error in your previous info on it?

Cheers, Henk.


Attachment 213155Attachment 213156Attachment 213157Attachment 213158

Thanks Henk, that is MOST helpful. Yes, it is easy to get errors in the data. Sometimes it is hard to read the numbers, but your photo is as clear as they get.
Of real interest is the R case casting numbers; the earliest use I have, and earlier by 700 builds than the split versions posted above. Can you also post photos of the case pairing #'s on the top, and the casting date codes on the pulley end of each half please.

build 1482 901/01 901582 looking for it's original home on Pelican:
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsc...iscovered.html
expect the original VIN was between 301400 and 301500

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by davep

Thanks Henk, that is MOST helpful. Yes, it is easy to get errors in the data. Sometimes it is hard to read the numbers, but your photo is as clear as they get.
Of real interest is the R case casting numbers; the earliest use I have, and earlier by 700 builds than the split versions posted above. Can you also post photos of the case pairing #'s on the top, and the casting date codes on the pulley end of each half please.

---

No problem Dave, I will make pictures when I get back in my shop on Monday, glad to be of help, you do awesome work!
As soon as the engines of the other numbers are out of the cars I can get the other info also.
In return I am asking a favor from you, this week I purchased a fairly early 1965 which I will restore, the COA was originated in 1994 and they didn't state a date of completion, when do you think this car was built/completed? The COA states (the car is matching numbers) Vin# 301802 and engine# 901909 with transmission# 101821

Thanks Henk.
Attachment 213241

Thanks Henk. The more engines that I can get fully documented with photos, the more clear the production picture becomes.
Regarding 301802, it is very difficult to provide an accurate completion date because they tended to be well out of sequence. However 301803, in the same paint, was completed July 20th, 1965. This was very near the end of 1965 MY production (to my way of thinking). I would guess that your car might be a bit earlier. Since you do have a COA, I don't see why PCNA would not assist with providing the date of completion and the Webasto serial #.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Carparc

In return I am asking a favor from you, this week I purchased a fairly early 1965 which I will restore, the COA was originated in 1994 and they didn't state a date of completion, when do you think this car was built/completed? The COA states (the car is matching numbers) Vin# 301802 and engine# 901909 with transmission# 101821

Thanks Henk.
Attachment 213241

---

That car was offered here a while ago (before you were active on this board)

http://www.early911sregistry.org/for...65-911-project

Richard

Here is # from an engine in Norway, 901/06 911278 7476
No info from the original car as the engine now sitz in a late 65 early 66 911.

Dave,

Here's one to add: 901/06 8204 with 911596 Anyone know what the little extra numbers mean" 7 27"? The rest look correct, i.e in sequence, etc. Thanks.

-Allen-