Type 901/xx Engine Build #'s

Here is one (from Norway):
3281549
901/14
16052

Belived original in 11880255 July -68 911 Targa Normal

Thanks. More updates added today.

My 1969T engine:

901/16, 19615

Would this be an early or late 69' production motor?
I ask because i want to put 69S heads on it.

Hi Davep, actually I do not have any "convincing argument" apart a simple and innocent curiosity to see how many numbers you put together now from the list posted at the beginning...no worries I do understand the point if you prefere to keep it confidential.
Thanks,
mbracing61

Another one in Norway (can not remember if I have reported this before..?):
901/01
1846
901946

Hello,

one from Germany
901/02
6580
960683
Attachment 415713
Attachment 415714
Attachment 415715

Attachment 415830


Attachment 415831



And one from France.

6391639

Attachment 415935


Attachment 415936


And Germany, another 901/10.


6391105

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tcsracing1

My 1969T engine: 901/16, 19615 Would this be an early or late 69' production motor?

---

16200 was about the start of 1969 motors, and 26350 the last, so 19615 is about 1/3 of way through 1969 production.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mbracing61

Hi Davep, actually I do not have any "convincing argument" apart a simple and innocent curiosity to see how many numbers you put together now from the list posted at the beginning...no worries I do understand the point if you prefere to keep it confidential.

---

I keep adding to the first two posts, so they are up to date to the last edit date. Except for engines below 903581 & build 3481 because the build # can be calculated by subtracting 90100 from the serial #. I save valuable space in the post by not including one where all we know is the type, serial & build. I do add ones where additional information is known. Max post size is 10000 characters. But please inform me of all engines found so they can be added to my master list.

PS, I can say that the original list was much smaller than the contents of the first post. It more than doubled and so required the second post be used for the second half of the list. Also the first post got trimmed a little to keep it under the maximum post size.